We are 103,000+ car owners sharing real-world car information.

Join Us

Mitsubishi Lancer vs. Ford Expedition MPG

Chart is based on 90 fuel economy reports for the Mitsubishi Lancer and 140 fuel economy reports for the Ford Expedition.

Mitsubishi Lancer MPG

Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2014 21.2 MPG Highway Percentage 40 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2011 19.0 MPG Highway Percentage 75 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2011 20.6 MPG Highway Percentage 60 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2011 29.2 MPG Highway Percentage 65 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2011 26.4 MPG Highway Percentage 30 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2010 20.0 MPG Highway Percentage 40 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2010 21.3 MPG Highway Percentage 16 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2010 25.7 MPG Highway Percentage 33 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2010 31.4 MPG Highway Percentage 80 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2010 25.3 MPG Highway Percentage 59 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2010 27.7 MPG Highway Percentage 41 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2009 23.6 MPG Highway Percentage 55 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2009 25.8 MPG Highway Percentage 43 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2009 29.5 MPG Highway Percentage 45 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2009 27.8 MPG Highway Percentage 0 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2009 30.5 MPG Highway Percentage 75 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2008 21.0 MPG Highway Percentage 40 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2008 29.1 MPG Highway Percentage 56 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2008 25.4 MPG Highway Percentage 59 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2008 32.4 MPG Highway Percentage 80 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2006 21.7 MPG Highway Percentage 50 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2006 23.5 MPG Highway Percentage 63 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2006 25.5 MPG Highway Percentage 57 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2006 33.4 MPG Highway Percentage 80 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2005 21.0 MPG Highway Percentage 40 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2005 22.0 MPG Highway Percentage 95 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2005 22.1 MPG Highway Percentage 75 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2003 23.7 MPG Highway Percentage 88 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2003 27.0 MPG Highway Percentage 75 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2002 26.2 MPG Highway Percentage 37 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2002 28.4 MPG Highway Percentage 45 percent
Year Body/Powertrain flat, hilly, or mountainousLand driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot A/C use: none to heavyA/C constant stop and goTraf % many stops per mileCity % stop every mile or twoSub % fairly steady speedHwy % Hwy Spd MPG
2014 4dr Sedan turbocharged 291hp 2.0L I4
5-speed manual AWD
flat med none 0 0 60 40 65 21.2  
2011 4dr Sedan turbocharged 291hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual AWD
flat med hvy 15 0 10 75 70 19.0  
2011 4dr Sedan turbocharged 237hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual AWD
flat med none 30 5 5 60 75 20.6  
2011 4dr Sedan 148-horsepower 2.0L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD
flat med light 5 20 10 65 63 29.2  
2011 4dr Hatch 148-horsepower 2.0L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD
flat med light 25 20 25 30 75 26.4  
2010 4dr Sedan turbocharged 291hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual AWD
flat med none 5 15 40 40 75 20.0  
2010 4dr Sedan turbocharged 237hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual AWD
flat med light 19 16 49 16 110 21.3  
Looking for a warranty? Get a quote.
2010 4dr Sedan 168-horsepower 2.4L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD
flat med none 10 21 36 33 67 25.7  
2010 4dr Sedan 168-horsepower 2.4L I4
5-speed manual FWD
flat light none 10 10 0 80 100 31.4  
2010 4dr Hatch 168-horsepower 2.4L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD
flat med light 0 3 38 59 70 25.3  
2010 4dr Hatch 168-horsepower 2.4L I4
5-speed manual FWD
hills med none 6 12 41 41 120 27.7  
2009 4dr Sedan turbocharged 237hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual AWD
flat med light 6 6 34 55 70 23.6  
2009 4dr Sedan 168-horsepower 2.4L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD
flat lead none 14 21 22 43 76 25.8  
2009 4dr Sedan 168-horsepower 2.4L I4
5-speed manual FWD
flat med light 10 21 23 45 88 29.5  
2009 4dr Sedan 152-horsepower 2.0L I4
CVT FWD
flat light hvy 20 50 30 0 0 27.8  
2009 4dr Sedan 152-horsepower 2.0L I4
5-speed manual FWD
flat med light 7 17 1 75 103 30.5  
2008 4dr Sedan turbocharged 291hp 2.0L I4
5-speed manual AWD
flat med light 7 20 33 40 83 21.0  
2008 4dr Sedan 152-horsepower 2.0L I4
CVT FWD
hills med none 10 21 14 56 80 29.1  
2008 4dr Sedan 152-horsepower 2.0L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD
flat light none 7 24 10 59 86 25.4  
2008 4dr Sedan 152-horsepower 2.0L I4
5-speed manual FWD
flat light none 0 0 20 80 70 32.4  
2006 4dr Sedan turbocharged 286hp 2.0L I4
6-speed manual AWD
flat med none 19 8 23 50 74 21.7  
2006 4dr Sedan turbocharged 286hp 2.0L I4
5-speed manual AWD
flat light none 5 28 5 63 60 23.5  
2006 4dr Sedan 162-horsepower 2.4L I4
4-speed automatic FWD
flat med none 16 16 12 57 79 25.5  
2006 4dr Sedan 120-horsepower 2.0L I4
5-speed manual FWD
flat light hvy 0 20 0 80 70 33.4  
2005 4dr Sedan turbocharged 276hp 2.0L I4
6-speed manual AWD
flat light none 15 5 40 40 60 21.0  
2005 4dr Sedan turbocharged 276hp 2.0L I4
5-speed manual AWD
flat lead none 5 0 0 95 60 22.0  
2005 4dr Sedan 162-horsepower 2.4L I4
5-speed manual FWD
flat med light 5 10 10 75 100 22.1  
2003 4dr Sedan turbocharged 271hp 2.0L I4
5-speed manual AWD
flat med light 1 4 8 88 70 23.7  
2003 4dr Sedan 120-horsepower 2.0L I4
5-speed manual FWD
flat med light 0 25 0 75 65 27.0  
2002 4dr Sedan 120-horsepower 2.0L I4
5-speed manual FWD
flat light none 7 19 37 37 55 26.2  
2002 4dr Sedan 120-horsepower 2.0L I4
4-speed automatic FWD
flat light light 18 13 25 45 65 28.4  

Return to top

This page shows only averages. See all the Mitsubishi Lancer fuel economy data.

Ford Expedition MPG

Ford Expedition Ford Expedition 2018 20.6 MPG Highway Percentage 40 percent Ford Expedition Ford Expedition 2011 11.6 MPG Highway Percentage 30 percent Ford Expedition Ford Expedition 2010 16.3 MPG Highway Percentage 48 percent Ford Expedition Ford Expedition 2010 17.8 MPG Highway Percentage 71 percent Ford Expedition Ford Expedition 2010 16.5 MPG Highway Percentage 43 percent Ford Expedition Ford Expedition 2009 16.3 MPG Highway Percentage 58 percent Ford Expedition Ford Expedition 2008 13.9 MPG Highway Percentage 35 percent Ford Expedition Ford Expedition 2008 19.1 MPG Highway Percentage 90 percent Ford Expedition Ford Expedition 2008 16.9 MPG Highway Percentage 25 percent Ford Expedition Ford Expedition 2008 15.6 MPG Highway Percentage 56 percent Ford Expedition Ford Expedition 2007 15.2 MPG Highway Percentage 72 percent Ford Expedition Ford Expedition 2007 18.5 MPG Highway Percentage 70 percent Ford Expedition Ford Expedition 2007 16.6 MPG Highway Percentage 55 percent Ford Expedition Ford Expedition 2006 16.0 MPG Highway Percentage 50 percent Ford Expedition Ford Expedition 2006 15.5 MPG Highway Percentage 58 percent Ford Expedition Ford Expedition 2005 17.0 MPG Highway Percentage 68 percent Ford Expedition Ford Expedition 2004 15.1 MPG Highway Percentage 40 percent Ford Expedition Ford Expedition 2004 14.2 MPG Highway Percentage 43 percent Ford Expedition Ford Expedition 2003 15.5 MPG Highway Percentage 25 percent Ford Expedition Ford Expedition 2003 13.3 MPG Highway Percentage 39 percent Ford Expedition Ford Expedition 2003 15.3 MPG Highway Percentage 53 percent Ford Expedition Ford Expedition 2002 13.5 MPG Highway Percentage 20 percent Ford Expedition Ford Expedition 2002 13.9 MPG Highway Percentage 20 percent Ford Expedition Ford Expedition 2002 14.8 MPG Highway Percentage 40 percent Ford Expedition Ford Expedition 2001 12.9 MPG Highway Percentage 90 percent Ford Expedition Ford Expedition 2001 14.1 MPG Highway Percentage 50 percent Ford Expedition Ford Expedition 2001 11.5 MPG Highway Percentage 90 percent Ford Expedition Ford Expedition 2000 13.8 MPG Highway Percentage 63 percent
Year Body/Powertrain flat, hilly, or mountainousLand driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot A/C use: none to heavyA/C constant stop and goTraf % many stops per mileCity % stop every mile or twoSub % fairly steady speedHwy % Hwy Spd MPG
2018 4dr SUV turbocharged 400hp 3.5L V6
10-speed shiftable automatic 4WD w/low range
flat med light 0 0 60 40 75 20.6  
2011 4dr SUV, ext. 310-horsepower 5.4L V8
6-speed automatic 4WD w/low range
flat light light 1 67 2 30 64 11.6  
2010 4dr SUV, ext. 310-horsepower 5.4L V8
6-speed automatic RWD
flat light none 5 5 43 48 63 16.3  
2010 4dr SUV 310-horsepower 5.4L V8
6-speed automatic RWD
hills light hvy 5 10 14 71 65 17.8  
2010 4dr SUV 310-horsepower 5.4L V8
6-speed automatic 4WD w/low range
flat light light 3 23 30 43 68 16.5  
2009 4dr SUV 310-horsepower 5.4L V8
6-speed automatic 4WD w/low range
flat med light 5 8 30 58 95 16.3  
2008 4dr SUV, ext. 300-horsepower 5.4L V8
6-speed automatic RWD
flat light none 25 30 10 35 70 13.9  
Looking for a warranty? Get a quote.
2008 4dr SUV, ext. 300-horsepower 5.4L V8
6-speed automatic 4WD w/low range
hills light none 5 0 5 90 70 19.1  
2008 4dr SUV 300-horsepower 5.4L V8
6-speed automatic RWD
hills light light 6 14 55 25 68 16.9  
2008 4dr SUV 300-horsepower 5.4L V8
6-speed automatic 4WD w/low range
hills med none 3 17 25 56 73 15.6  
2007 4dr SUV, ext. 300-horsepower 5.4L V8
6-speed automatic 4WD w/low range
flat med none 5 5 18 72 65 15.2  
2007 4dr SUV 300-horsepower 5.4L V8
6-speed automatic RWD
flat light light 5 5 20 70 65 18.5  
2007 4dr SUV 300-horsepower 5.4L V8
6-speed automatic 4WD w/low range
hills med none 0 15 30 55 68 16.6  
2006 4dr SUV 300-horsepower 5.4L V8
4-speed automatic RWD
flat light hvy 10 0 40 50 70 16.0  
2006 4dr SUV 300-horsepower 5.4L V8
4-speed automatic 4WD w/low range
hills light light 8 14 21 58 68 15.5  
2005 4dr SUV 300-horsepower 5.4L V8
4-speed automatic 4WD w/low range
hills light none 1 17 14 68 71 17.0  
2004 4dr SUV 260-horsepower 5.4L V8
4-speed automatic RWD
flat light light 5 15 40 40 70 15.1  
2004 4dr SUV 260-horsepower 5.4L V8
4-speed automatic 4WD w/low range
hills light none 4 18 35 43 94 14.2  
2003 4dr SUV 260-horsepower 5.4L V8
4-speed automatic RWD
flat light light 23 23 29 25 70 15.5  
2003 4dr SUV 260-horsepower 5.4L V8
4-speed automatic 4WD w/low range
flat med light 20 18 24 39 85 13.3  
2003 4dr SUV 232-horsepower 4.6L V8
4-speed automatic RWD
flat med light 14 14 19 53 75 15.3  
2002 4dr SUV 260-horsepower 5.4L V8
4-speed automatic RWD
flat med none 2 28 50 20 70 13.5  
2002 4dr SUV 260-horsepower 5.4L V8
4-speed automatic 4WD w/low range
hills med none 10 50 20 20 60 13.9  
2002 4dr SUV 232-horsepower 4.6L V8
4-speed automatic 4WD w/low range
flat light light 15 5 40 40 65 14.8  
2001 4dr SUV 260-horsepower 5.4L V8
4-speed automatic RWD
flat light light 5 0 5 90 70 12.9  
2001 4dr SUV 260-horsepower 5.4L V8
4-speed automatic 4WD w/low range
flat light light 5 0 45 50 55 14.1  
2001 4dr SUV 232-horsepower 4.6L V8
4-speed automatic RWD
flat med light 0 0 10 90 70 11.5  
2000 4dr SUV 260-horsepower 5.4L V8
4-speed automatic RWD
flat light none 0 3 35 63 63 13.8  

Return to top

This page shows only averages. See all the Ford Expedition fuel economy data.

Mitsubishi Lancer vs. Ford Expedition MPG

Unlike other fuel economy surveys, TrueDelta's Real-World Gas Mileage Survey includes questions about how and where a car was driven. So you can get an idea of the Mitsubishi Lancer and Ford Expedition's where a car was driven. So you can get an idea of their real-world MPG based on how and where you drive a car.

See TrueDelta's information for all Sedans and Hatchbacks.
See TrueDelta's information for all Mitsubishi models and Ford models.

TrueDelta Reviews the Real Gas Mileage of the Mitsubishi Lancer

Mitsubishi Lancer Real Gas Mileage: Cons
YearComment
Mitsubishi did improve the powertrain's EPA ratings a few years ago. But they're still only 22 mpg city, 31 highway. Even the portly Dart GT manages 23/33 with a manual transmission. Credit a sixth ratio the Lancer lacks. In my suburban driving, the trip computer regularly reported averages in the high 20s. Other compacts have done better in the same driving, but not by as wide a margin as the EPA numbers would suggest. see full Mitsubishi Lancer review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Mitsubishi Lancer

Mitsubishi Lancer Real Gas Mileage: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2011 4dr Sedan 148-horsepower 2.0L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD
I am getting consistent 27-29 MPG on mid-west (flat) back county roads during my commute. I am getting 32 MPG on the highway. My driving style is moderately spirited. see full Mitsubishi Lancer review
2010 4dr Sedan 168-horsepower 2.4L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD
Uses regular gas and gets about 30 mpg. My Civic SI was getting about the same but used premium. see full Mitsubishi Lancer review
2009 4dr Sedan 168-horsepower 2.4L I4
5-speed manual FWD
Very good millage/power ratio see full Mitsubishi Lancer review
2008 4dr Sedan 152-horsepower 2.0L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD
The car gets average fuel economy in its class, coming in at about 22 mpg city, 30 mpg highway, but it is well above most cars. see full Mitsubishi Lancer review
Mitsubishi Lancer Real Gas Mileage: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2010 4dr Sedan 168-horsepower 2.4L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD
It's not as great as you'd expect from an econobox. If this is your biggest concern, this is not the car for you. see full Mitsubishi Lancer review
2009 4dr Sedan 168-horsepower 2.4L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD
17 mpg in 2.4 litter my altima that is 2.5 litter i get 23 same driving conditions hmm bigger engin better gas if it always worked out this way i would buy a bmw 335 xdrive see full Mitsubishi Lancer review
2008 4dr Sedan turbocharged 291hp 2.0L I4
5-speed manual AWD
22-24 avarage MPG see full Mitsubishi Lancer review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Ford Expedition

Ford Expedition Real Gas Mileage: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2008 4dr SUV 300-horsepower 5.4L V8
6-speed automatic 4WD w/low range
Amazing fuel ecomomy for size....17.5 mpg overall, have hit over 20 mpg on 5 tanks, high is 22 mpg. 6-speed auto had 2 overdrives. see full Ford Expedition review
Ford Expedition Real Gas Mileage: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2014 0 Seriously, what a pig. Not towing - mostly highway (over 400 miles worth) but some city driving as well - in 600 miles, we averaged 13.9 MPG. The car's computer appears reasonably accurate (as a rental, I do not know if it was really full when picked up but the second tank MPG was within 0.5 MPG of my calculation based on mileage). Yes, there were generally 6 passengers (4 adults, 2 kids) and the AC blowing (front and rear) to combate the Texas heat, but I was light with the thottle and it was quite flat. I am well aware no one will buy one of these based on gas mileage but this performance is just abysmal. Hopefully the next generation will improve. see full Ford Expedition review
2007 4dr SUV 300-horsepower 5.4L V8
6-speed automatic 4WD w/low range
It weights 3 tons, so fuel economy is not going to be great, but 13-14mpg in town and near 20mpg on the high way is achievable. see full Ford Expedition review
2005 4dr SUV 300-horsepower 5.4L V8
4-speed automatic RWD
13 in the city, 18 on the road, not bad but a diesel would be better see full Ford Expedition review
2004 4dr SUV 260-horsepower 5.4L V8
4-speed automatic 4WD w/low range
Vehicle is expensive to operate see full Ford Expedition review
2003 4dr SUV 232-horsepower 4.6L V8
4-speed automatic 4WD w/low range
10.7 mpg. Need to say more? see full Ford Expedition review
2000 4dr SUV 260-horsepower 5.4L V8
4-speed automatic RWD
The 5.4 L engine gulps fuel. Usually get 14 around town and best of 18 mph on highway if easy on the throttle. Probably all that can be expected of such a heavy vehicle with high wind resistance. see full Ford Expedition review