| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2013 Mitsubishi Outlander and 2011 Toyota RAV4 Specifications
| Model Year | 2013 | 2011 | |
| Model | Mitsubishi Outlander | Toyota RAV4 | |
| Engine | 3.0L V6 OHC-4v 172 kW@6250 291 Nm@3750 |
3.5L V6 DOHC-4v 201 kW@6200 334 Nm@4700 |
|
| Transmission | 6-speed shiftable automatic | 5-speed automatic | |
| Drivetrain | AWD | AWD | |
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,670 mm | 2,659 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,641 mm | 4,600 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,801 mm | 1,816 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,679 mm | 1,684 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,745 kg | 1,669 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 63 L | 60 L | 3 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,024 mm | 1,036 mm | 0 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,433 mm | 1,450 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,326 mm | 1,367 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,057 mm | 1,062 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 973 mm | 1,008 mm | 972 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,425 mm | 1,405 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,318 mm | 1,331 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 935 mm | 973 mm | -38 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 899 mm | 945 mm | -46 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,265 mm | 1,336 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 993 mm | 1,100 mm | 992 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 704 mm | 762 mm | -58 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,695 mm (over 3 rows) | 2,797 mm (over 3 rows) | 0 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 422 L | 348 L | 74 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 1,025 L | 1,053 L | 0 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 2,056 L | 2,067 L | 0 L |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander
| 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| There's a reason three-row crossovers tend to be much larger than this pair. The third-row seat in the Kia Sorento doesn't provide enough headroom for the average adult male. Both comfort and knee room are also in short supply. You might think that a seat couldn't get any tighter than the Sorento's third row. But, based on the official specs, the Outlander has nearly four inches less combined legroom--a huge difference. Even children won't fit in the Mitsubishi's third row unless you slide the second row forward much of the way. The 2014's third row seat is at least a conventional seat. Last year it was little more than a sling. In either vehicle the second row split bench is roomy and comfortable, with enough height off the floor to provide adults with good thigh support. But the rear passengers in the Outlander don't get air vents. Those in the Kia do. see full Mitsubishi Outlander review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander.
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2011 Toyota RAV4
| 2011 Toyota RAV4 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 4dr SUV 179-horsepower 2.5L I4 4-speed automatic FWD |
I'm about 6'3" and 220lbs so I get cramped on long trips. see full Toyota RAV4 review |
| 2012 | 4dr SUV 179-horsepower 2.5L I4 4-speed automatic FWD |
I'm about 6'3" and 220lbs so I get cramped on long trips. see full Toyota RAV4 review |
| 2011 | 4dr SUV 179-horsepower 2.5L I4 4-speed automatic AWD |
back seat is hard, not much leg room see full Toyota RAV4 review |
| 2010 | 4dr SUV 179-horsepower 2.5L I4 4-speed automatic AWD |
no lumbar support see full Toyota RAV4 review |
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Mitsubishi models.
