Nissan Rogue Nissan Rogue 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban 2016

We are 103,000+ car owners sharing real-world car information.

Join Us

Nissan Rogue (2009) vs. Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban (2016) Specs

How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2009 Nissan Rogue and 2016 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban specs.

2009 Nissan Rogue and 2016 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban Specifications

Model Year 2009 2016  
Model Nissan Rogue Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban  
Engine 2.5L I4
DOHC-4v
170 hp@6000
175 lb-ft@4400
5.3L V8
OHV-2v
355 hp@5600
383 lb-ft@4100
 
Transmission CVT 6-speed shiftable automatic  
Drivetrain FWD RWD  
Body 4dr SUV 4dr SUV  
      Difference
Wheelbase 105.9 in 116.0 in -10.1 in
Length 182.9 in 204.0 in -21.1 in
Width 70.9 in 80.5 in -9.6 in
Height 65.3 in 74.4 in -9.1 in
Curb Weight 3267 lb. 5466 lb. -2199 lb.
Fuel Capacity 15.9 gal. 26.0 gal. -10.1 gal.
Headroom, Row 1 40.4 in 42.8 in -2.4 in
Shoulder Room, Row 1 55.9 in 64.8 in -8.9 in
Hip Room, Row 1 53.1 in 60.8 in -7.7 in
Legroom, Row 1 42.5 in 45.3 in -2.8 in
Headroom, Row 2 38.3 in 38.7 in -0.4 in
Shoulder Room, Row 2 53.6 in 65.1 in -11.5 in
Hip Room, Row 2 51.2 in 60.3 in -9.1 in
Legroom, Row 2 35.3 in 39.0 in -3.7 in
Headroom, Row 3 0.0 in 38.1 in -38.1 in
Shoulder Room, Row 3 0.0 in 62.6 in -62.6 in
Hip Room, Row 3 0.0 in 49.3 in -49.3 in
Legroom, Row 3 0.0 in 24.8 in -24.8 in
Total Legroom 77.8 in (over 2 rows) 109.1 in (over 3 rows) -31.3 in
Cargo Volume, Minimum 28.9 ft3 15.3 ft3 13.6 ft3
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 28.9 51.6 ft3 -22.7
Cargo Volume, Maximum 57.9 ft3 94.7 ft3 -36.8 ft3

Return to top

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2009 Nissan Rogue

2009 Nissan Rogue Seat Room and Comfort: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2010 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4
CVT FWD
Not great, not awful. Compared to my previous BMW 535i, it's awful, but for the class of vehicle it's OK for shorter distances, which is mostly what I use it for. see full Nissan Rogue review
2010 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT AWD
holds my three young kids comfortably, like the flat foot room. I don't like the front seats, I find them too flat and I don't like that they dont tilt back like my TSX see full Nissan Rogue review
2010 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4
CVT AWD
Picked up one of my fat friends while on the test ride and had him ride in the back. Him and his wife were very comfortable. Lots of leg and foot room. see full Nissan Rogue review
2010 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4
CVT AWD
Lots of leg room and the drivers seat is very adjustable and comfortable. I have wide shoulders and the leather seats are very comfortable for me. see full Nissan Rogue review
2008 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4
CVT AWD
With leather, power seats allows for height adjustment to LOWER the seat. The non-power seats in the S (not SL) have no height adjustment and are far too high for an average male driver. Wide enough to fit an average 6 ft male. see full Nissan Rogue review
2008 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4
CVT AWD
Great for long trips and heated seats see full Nissan Rogue review
2009 Nissan Rogue Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2010 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4
CVT FWD
Roof pitch makes it seem more cramped. see full Nissan Rogue review
2010 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT AWD
Front seats too bench like and lacking in adjustments see full Nissan Rogue review
2009 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4
CVT AWD
uncomfortable for 6 ft 2 in driver see full Nissan Rogue review
2008 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4
CVT AWD
My previous vehicle, a Lancer had more legroom than this vehicle. see full Nissan Rogue review
 

TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban

2016 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban Seat Room and Comfort: Pros
YearComment
2015 Some (perhaps more than some) people are drawn to large SUVs because they like to feel like the king of the road when behind the wheel. Others need a lot of space while driving, or at least feel they do. Few vehicles have more front seat room than the new Tahoe. With an inch-and-a-half less shoulder room, the Ford's front-row dimensions aren't quite as generous, and its taller, shifter-festooned console is more intrusive. The front seats are comfortable in both. The Expedition's are a little wider and softer, and they're upholstered with especially rich hides in the King Ranch and Platinum (vs. the most recently tested and photographed Limited). Whether this is preferable is a matter of taste. see full Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban review
2016 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
YearComment
Both the Tahoe and Expedition have roomy, comfortable second-row seats, with a slight edge to the higher cushions in the Chevrolet. Bonus points to the Tahoe for automatic rear climate controls (they're manual in the Expedition). Move to the third-row seat, and you'll wonder why, despite redesigns for 2007 and 2015, General Motors has stubbornly refused to follow Ford's 2003 switch from a solid rear axle to an independent rear suspension. With a solid axle, the rear floor must be high to permit the rear differential to travel up and down when a wheel hits a bump. Consequently, the Tahoe's third row seat must be very thinly constructed and mounted very close to the floor. Even pre-teen children won't be comfortable in it. In sharp contrast, the Expedition's third-row seat is higher off the floor than its second-row seat, much less the ridiculously low third row in the Tahoe, and is--surprise--considerably more comfortable as a result. The Suburban's third-row seat is roomier than the Tahoe's but still far inferior to the Expedition's. see full Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban

None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban.

Be the first!

See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Nissan models.