Model Year | 2017 | 2012 | |
Model | Nissan Rogue | Honda Fit | |
Engine | 2.5L I4 DOHC-4v 170 hp@6000 175 lb-ft@4400 |
1.5L I4 OHC-4v 117 hp@6600 106 lb-ft@4800 |
|
Transmission | CVT | 5-speed automatic | |
Drivetrain | FWD | FWD | |
Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Hatch | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 106.5 in | 98.4 in | 8.1 in |
Length | 184.5 in | 161.6 in | 22.9 in |
Width | 72.4 in | 66.7 in | 5.7 in |
Height | 66.3 in | 60.0 in | 6.3 in |
Curb Weight | 3424 lb. | 2577 lb. | 847 lb. |
Fuel Capacity | 14.5 gal. | 10.6 gal. | 3.9 gal. |
Headroom, Row 1 | 41.6 in | 40.4 in | 1.2 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 56.6 in | 52.7 in | 3.9 in |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 54.0 in | 51.5 in | 2.5 in |
Legroom, Row 1 | 43.0 in | 41.3 in | 1.7 in |
Headroom, Row 2 | 38.5 in | 39.0 in | -0.5 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 55.9 in | 51.3 in | 4.6 in |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 52.1 in | 51.3 in | 0.8 in |
Legroom, Row 2 | 37.9 in | 34.5 in | 3.4 in |
Headroom, Row 3 | 34.6 in | 0.0 in | 34.6 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 49.3 in | 0.0 in | 49.3 in |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 42.0 in | 0.0 in | 42 in |
Legroom, Row 3 | 31.4 in | 0.0 in | 31.4 in |
Total Legroom | 112.3 in (over 3 rows) | 75.8 in (over 2 rows) | 36.5 in |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 9.4 ft3 | 20.6 ft3 | -11.2 ft3 |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 32.0 ft3 | 20.6 | 11.4 ft3 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 70.0 ft3 | 57.3 ft3 | 12.7 ft3 |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2017 Nissan Rogue.
2012 Honda Fit Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2013 | 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
The best in this category (when you take into consideration the size of the trunk). see full Honda Fit review |
2012 Honda Fit Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2013 | 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Seat bottoms are typical Japanese style short bottomed and not conducive to long duration drives. see full Honda Fit review |
2013 | 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
One more thing. Rear seat comfort was obviously not a big selling point, nor a necessary feature. But one piece of it was worse than it had to be: the rear seat headrests. The artful circular shape and limited adjustment made the rear seats even harder to use; the headrest would tend to jab passengers in their spine. A better solution which was more even with the seat back would really have helped here. see full Honda Fit review |