| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2011 Nissan Rogue and 2017 Mazda CX-3 Specifications
| Model Year | 2011 | 2017 | |
| Model | Nissan Rogue | Mazda CX-3 | |
| Engine | 2.5L I4 DOHC-4v 127 kW@6000 237 Nm@4400 |
2.0L I4 DOHC-4v 109 kW@6000 198 Nm@2800 |
|
| Transmission | CVT | 6-speed shiftable automatic | |
| Drivetrain | AWD | AWD | |
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,690 mm | 2,570 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,656 mm | 4,275 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,801 mm | 1,768 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,659 mm | 1,542 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,555 kg | 1,339 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 60 L | 48 L | 12 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,026 mm | 975 mm | -974 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,420 mm | 1,359 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,349 mm | 1,328 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,080 mm | 1,059 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 973 mm | 945 mm | 28 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,361 mm | 1,280 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,300 mm | 1,245 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 897 mm | 889 mm | 8 mm |
| Total Legroom | 1,976 mm (over 2 rows) | 1,948 mm (over 2 rows) | 0 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 818 L | 351 L | 467 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 1,640 L | 1,260 L | 0 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2011 Nissan Rogue
| 2011 Nissan Rogue Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4 CVT FWD |
I'm over 6' tall with long legs, and I have plenty of room. I can sit in the rear seat after I set the driver's seat at a comfortable position, as well. I wish the lower cushion height/angle could be adjusted, but still very comfortable. see full Nissan Rogue review |
| 2010 | 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4 6-speed shiftable CVT AWD |
holds my three young kids comfortably, like the flat foot room. I don't like the front seats, I find them too flat and I don't like that they dont tilt back like my TSX see full Nissan Rogue review |
| 2010 | 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4 CVT FWD |
Not great, not awful. Compared to my previous BMW 535i, it's awful, but for the class of vehicle it's OK for shorter distances, which is mostly what I use it for. see full Nissan Rogue review |
| 2010 | 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4 CVT AWD |
Picked up one of my fat friends while on the test ride and had him ride in the back. Him and his wife were very comfortable. Lots of leg and foot room. see full Nissan Rogue review |
| 2010 | 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4 CVT AWD |
Lots of leg room and the drivers seat is very adjustable and comfortable. I have wide shoulders and the leather seats are very comfortable for me. see full Nissan Rogue review |
| 2011 Nissan Rogue Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2010 | 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4 6-speed shiftable CVT AWD |
Front seats too bench like and lacking in adjustments see full Nissan Rogue review |
| 2010 | 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4 CVT FWD |
Roof pitch makes it seem more cramped. see full Nissan Rogue review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2017 Mazda CX-3
| 2017 Mazda CX-3 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2016 | The CX-3's driving position is very good, more car-like even than the HR-V's. The view forward is open. The view rearward, not so much, as the racy styling yields rear windows that are quite a bit smaller than the front ones. To help compensate, the outside mirrors are large plus blind sport warning is standard on the Touring and Grand Touring. The CX-3's driver seat is very comfortable and provides good lateral support in turns. The cloth center pocket is cushy without being mushy. Unlike in the HR-V and some others, the headrest does not jut uncomfortably far forward. But the lumbar bulge is not adjustable. As is, it fit my back well, but many people will wish for more of a bulge. The HR-V's also non-adjustable lumbar bulge was too pronounced for my taste. The JUKE's seats are comfortable, but for effective side bolsters (and then some) you must step up to the NISMO. Worth noting for those of you who get your coffee to go: the cup holders are located beneath the armrest (optional on the Sport, standard on the others). If you want to use them, then you can't use the armrest. see full Mazda CX-3 review | |
| 2017 Mazda CX-3 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| For people who have no interest in a manual transmission (the great majority), the Mazda CX-3's largest shortcoming is a rear seat that is tight even by small car standards. Sitting behind my 5-9 self, my knees pressed lightly against the front seat backs. I wasn't uncomfortable, but felt a little closed-in. A shame, as rear headroom is relatively plentiful and the rear seat is otherwise very comfortable. The HR-V provides about four inches more rear legroom, a big difference. According to their specs, the JUKE has three inches less rear legroom than the Mazda. In reality, though, I had perhaps an inch more rear knee room, but less rear headroom. The Nissan's rear seat might be slightly more adult-friendly than the Mazda's, but neither is a good choice if people taller than me will be sitting in both rows. see full Mazda CX-3 review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2017 Mazda CX-3
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2017 Mazda CX-3.
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Nissan models.
