MENU
1 0 3 4 3 4

We are 103,000+ car owners sharing real-world car information.

Join Us

Nissan Versa vs. Cadillac CTS Fuel Economy (g/100m)

Chart is based on 1004 fuel economy reports for the Nissan Versa and 133 fuel economy reports for the Cadillac CTS.

Nissan Versa g/100m

Nissan Versa Nissan Versa 2015 2.7 MPG Highway Percentage 81 percent Nissan Versa Nissan Versa 2013 3.0 MPG Highway Percentage 0 percent Nissan Versa Nissan Versa 2012 2.7 MPG Highway Percentage 44 percent Nissan Versa Nissan Versa 2012 3.1 MPG Highway Percentage 65 percent Nissan Versa Nissan Versa 2011 3.4 MPG Highway Percentage 50 percent Nissan Versa Nissan Versa 2011 2.6 MPG Highway Percentage 83 percent Nissan Versa Nissan Versa 2011 2.9 MPG Highway Percentage 65 percent Nissan Versa Nissan Versa 2010 3.8 MPG Highway Percentage 42 percent Nissan Versa Nissan Versa 2010 3.2 MPG Highway Percentage 63 percent Nissan Versa Nissan Versa 2010 3.3 MPG Highway Percentage 53 percent Nissan Versa Nissan Versa 2010 17.3 MPG Highway Percentage 52 percent Nissan Versa Nissan Versa 2010 3.7 MPG Highway Percentage 50 percent Nissan Versa Nissan Versa 2009 2.9 MPG Highway Percentage 53 percent Nissan Versa Nissan Versa 2009 3.6 MPG Highway Percentage 83 percent Nissan Versa Nissan Versa 2009 3.0 MPG Highway Percentage 74 percent Nissan Versa Nissan Versa 2009 3.4 MPG Highway Percentage 40 percent Nissan Versa Nissan Versa 2009 3.5 MPG Highway Percentage 48 percent Nissan Versa Nissan Versa 2009 14.9 MPG Highway Percentage 66 percent Nissan Versa Nissan Versa 2009 3.4 MPG Highway Percentage 55 percent Nissan Versa Nissan Versa 2008 3.8 MPG Highway Percentage 21 percent Nissan Versa Nissan Versa 2008 3.6 MPG Highway Percentage 80 percent Nissan Versa Nissan Versa 2008 12.6 MPG Highway Percentage 47 percent Nissan Versa Nissan Versa 2008 13.2 MPG Highway Percentage 37 percent Nissan Versa Nissan Versa 2008 4.0 MPG Highway Percentage 27 percent Nissan Versa Nissan Versa 2007 3.6 MPG Highway Percentage 35 percent Nissan Versa Nissan Versa 2007 3.4 MPG Highway Percentage 10 percent Nissan Versa Nissan Versa 2007 4.5 MPG Highway Percentage 43 percent Nissan Versa Nissan Versa 2007 4.4 MPG Highway Percentage 48 percent Nissan Versa Nissan Versa 2007 3.7 MPG Highway Percentage 49 percent Nissan Versa Nissan Versa 2007 7.2 MPG Highway Percentage 40 percent
Year Body/Powertrain flat, hilly, or mountainousLand driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot A/C use: none to heavyA/C constant stop and goTraf % many stops per mileCity % stop every mile or twoSub % fairly steady speedHwy % Hwy Spd g/100m
2015 4dr Sedan 109-horsepower 1.6L I4
5-speed manual FWD		 flat med light 0 4 15 81 56 2.7  
2013 4dr Sedan 109-horsepower 1.6L I4
5-speed manual FWD		 mtns med light 0 0 0 0 0 3.0  
2012 4dr Sedan 109-horsepower 1.6L I4
CVT FWD		 flat light light 23 13 20 44 63 2.7  
2012 4dr Hatch 122-horsepower 1.8L I4
6-speed manual FWD		 flat light light 3 16 16 65 63 3.1  
2011 4dr Hatch 122-horsepower 1.8L I4
CVT FWD		 hills v.lt none 0 5 45 50 65 3.4  
2011 4dr Hatch 122-horsepower 1.8L I4
6-speed manual FWD		 flat light none 0 2 15 83 69 2.6  
2011 4dr Hatch 122-horsepower 1.8L I4
4-speed automatic FWD		 flat med hvy 5 15 15 65 75 2.9  
Looking for a warranty? Get a quote.
2010 4dr Sedan 122-horsepower 1.8L I4
4-speed automatic FWD		 flat med light 4 11 43 42 60 3.8  
2010 4dr Sedan 107-horsepower 1.6L I4
5-speed manual FWD		 flat med hvy 20 11 6 63 71 3.2  
2010 4dr Hatch 122-horsepower 1.8L I4
CVT FWD		 hills med none 0 0 47 53 62 3.3  
2010 4dr Hatch 122-horsepower 1.8L I4
6-speed manual FWD		 flat med none 13 24 11 52 107 17.3  
2010 4dr Hatch 122-horsepower 1.8L I4
4-speed automatic FWD		 flat light light 0 30 20 50 68 3.7  
2009 4dr Sedan 122-horsepower 1.8L I4
6-speed manual FWD		 flat med light 13 18 18 53 68 2.9  
2009 4dr Sedan 122-horsepower 1.8L I4
4-speed automatic FWD		 flat med hvy 2 8 8 83 70 3.6  
2009 4dr Sedan 107-horsepower 1.6L I4
5-speed manual FWD		 flat light light 11 5 10 74 69 3.0  
2009 4dr Sedan 107-horsepower 1.6L I4
4-speed automatic FWD		 flat med light 0 30 30 40 60 3.4  
2009 4dr Hatch 122-horsepower 1.8L I4
CVT FWD		 flat v.lt none 1 30 22 48 61 3.5  
2009 4dr Hatch 122-horsepower 1.8L I4
6-speed manual FWD		 flat light none 27 6 2 66 95 14.9  
2009 4dr Hatch 122-horsepower 1.8L I4
4-speed automatic FWD		 flat light light 4 12 30 55 71 3.4  
2008 4dr Sedan 122-horsepower 1.8L I4
CVT FWD		 flat med none 0 5 74 21 60 3.8  
2008 4dr Sedan 122-horsepower 1.8L I4
4-speed automatic FWD		 flat med hvy 0 15 5 80 70 3.6  
2008 4dr Hatch 122-horsepower 1.8L I4
CVT FWD		 flat med none 14 16 23 47 98 12.6  
2008 4dr Hatch 122-horsepower 1.8L I4
6-speed manual FWD		 flat light light 13 29 21 37 89 13.2  
2008 4dr Hatch 122-horsepower 1.8L I4
4-speed automatic FWD		 flat med none 18 20 35 27 67 4.0  
2007 4dr Sedan 122-horsepower 1.8L I4
CVT FWD		 flat light light 22 22 22 35 70 3.6  
2007 4dr Sedan 122-horsepower 1.8L I4
6-speed manual FWD		 flat light light 7 8 75 10 75 3.4  
2007 4dr Sedan 122-horsepower 1.8L I4
4-speed automatic FWD		 flat light none 9 43 4 43 60 4.5  
2007 4dr Hatch 122-horsepower 1.8L I4
CVT FWD		 flat light light 14 17 21 48 68 4.4  
2007 4dr Hatch 122-horsepower 1.8L I4
6-speed manual FWD		 flat med light 9 27 15 49 68 3.7  
2007 4dr Hatch 122-horsepower 1.8L I4
4-speed automatic FWD		 flat med none 10 30 21 40 78 7.2  

Return to top

This page shows only averages. See all the Nissan Versa fuel economy data.

Cadillac CTS g/100m

Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2016 4.5 MPG Highway Percentage 40 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2011 21.1 MPG Highway Percentage 23 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2010 4.3 MPG Highway Percentage 93 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2010 6.5 MPG Highway Percentage 34 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2010 3.9 MPG Highway Percentage 100 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2009 6.7 MPG Highway Percentage 44 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2009 7.6 MPG Highway Percentage 55 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2009 4.5 MPG Highway Percentage 53 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2009 5.1 MPG Highway Percentage 37 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2008 5.2 MPG Highway Percentage 24 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2008 5.1 MPG Highway Percentage 31 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2008 4.5 MPG Highway Percentage 53 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2008 4.3 MPG Highway Percentage 74 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2008 5.2 MPG Highway Percentage 17 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2007 5.0 MPG Highway Percentage 78 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2007 5.1 MPG Highway Percentage 30 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2006 5.4 MPG Highway Percentage 35 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2006 4.8 MPG Highway Percentage 60 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2006 9.8 MPG Highway Percentage 72 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2006 32.9 MPG Highway Percentage 25 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2006 5.2 MPG Highway Percentage 23 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2005 5.0 MPG Highway Percentage 57 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2005 5.0 MPG Highway Percentage 48 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2005 6.0 MPG Highway Percentage 47 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2004 4.9 MPG Highway Percentage 70 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2004 4.7 MPG Highway Percentage 45 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2004 3.9 MPG Highway Percentage 80 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2003 12.3 MPG Highway Percentage 40 percent
Year Body/Powertrain flat, hilly, or mountainousLand driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot A/C use: none to heavyA/C constant stop and goTraf % many stops per mileCity % stop every mile or twoSub % fairly steady speedHwy % Hwy Spd g/100m
2016 4dr Sedan turbocharged 268hp 2.0L I4
8-speed shiftable automatic AWD		 flat med light 0 0 60 40 70 4.5  
2011 4dr Sedan 304-horsepower 3.6L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD		 flat med hvy 23 40 13 23 83 21.1  
2010 4dr Wagon 304-horsepower 3.6L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD		 hills light light 0 5 2 93 60 4.3  
2010 4dr Wagon 270-horsepower 3.0L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD		 flat v.lt none 0 64 3 34 70 6.5  
2010 4dr Sedan 304-horsepower 3.6L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic RWD		 flat light none 0 0 0 100 70 3.9  
2009 4dr Sedan supercharged 556hp 6.2L V8
6-speed shiftable automatic RWD		 hills lead light 10 8 39 44 62 6.7  
2009 4dr Sedan supercharged 556hp 6.2L V8
6-speed manual RWD		 hills lead light 5 5 35 55 65 7.6  
Looking for a warranty? Get a quote.
2009 4dr Sedan 304-horsepower 3.6L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic RWD		 hills med hvy 11 16 21 53 71 4.5  
2009 4dr Sedan 304-horsepower 3.6L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD		 flat med light 3 18 42 37 57 5.1  
2008 4dr Sedan 304-horsepower 3.6L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic RWD		 flat light light 10 32 34 24 72 5.2  
2008 4dr Sedan 304-horsepower 3.6L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD		 flat med none 4 23 42 31 70 5.1  
2008 4dr Sedan 304-horsepower 3.6L V6
6-speed manual RWD		 hills med light 8 25 15 53 75 4.5  
2008 4dr Sedan 263-horsepower 3.6L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic RWD		 flat light none 1 6 19 74 70 4.3  
2008 4dr Sedan 263-horsepower 3.6L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD		 hills med light 0 0 83 17 70 5.2  
2007 4dr Sedan 255-horsepower 3.6L V6
5-speed shiftable automatic RWD		 flat light light 4 9 9 78 71 5.0  
2007 4dr Sedan 210-horsepower 2.8L V6
5-speed shiftable automatic RWD		 mtns lead light 0 0 70 30 60 5.1  
2006 4dr Sedan 400-horsepower 6.0L V8
6-speed manual RWD		 flat med hvy 15 50 0 35 70 5.4  
2006 4dr Sedan 255-horsepower 3.6L V6
6-speed manual RWD		 flat lead light 25 10 5 60 85 4.8  
2006 4dr Sedan 255-horsepower 3.6L V6
5-speed shiftable automatic RWD		 flat med light 7 11 11 72 80 9.8  
2006 4dr Sedan 210-horsepower 2.8L V6
6-speed manual RWD		 flat light none 5 20 50 25 100 32.9  
2006 4dr Sedan 210-horsepower 2.8L V6
5-speed shiftable automatic RWD		 flat med light 7 20 50 23 67 5.2  
2005 4dr Sedan 400-horsepower 5.7L V8
6-speed manual RWD		 flat med light 7 13 24 57 69 5.0  
2005 4dr Sedan 255-horsepower 3.6L V6
6-speed manual RWD		 flat med none 2 15 35 48 60 5.0  
2005 4dr Sedan 255-horsepower 3.6L V6
5-speed automatic RWD		 flat med light 8 12 33 47 69 6.0  
2004 4dr Sedan 400-horsepower 5.7L V8
6-speed manual RWD		 flat med light 0 0 30 70 67 4.9  
2004 4dr Sedan 255-horsepower 3.6L V6
5-speed automatic RWD		 flat med none 7 25 24 45 66 4.7  
2004 4dr Sedan 220-horsepower 3.2L V6
5-speed manual RWD		 flat med light 10 10 0 80 70 3.9  
2003 4dr Sedan 220-horsepower 3.2L V6
5-speed automatic RWD		 flat med light 10 17 33 40 91 12.3  

Return to top

This page shows only averages. See all the Cadillac CTS fuel economy data.

Nissan Versa vs. Cadillac CTS Fuel Economy (g/100m)

Unlike other fuel economy surveys, TrueDelta's Real-World Gas Mileage Survey includes questions about how and where a car was driven. So you can get an idea of the Nissan Versa and Cadillac CTS's where a car was driven. So you can get an idea of their real-world g/100m based on how and where you drive a car.

See TrueDelta's information for all Hatchbacks and Sedans.
See TrueDelta's information for all Nissan models and Cadillac models.

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Nissan Versa

Nissan Versa Real Gas Mileage: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2014 0 Trip computer indicated 36 MPG in mixed urban and highway driving. Appears to be accurate based on how much gas I put in it at the end of the rental period. The urban driving also had idling time so was not fuel economy friendly. see full Nissan Versa review
2013 4dr Sedan 109-horsepower 1.6L I4
5-speed manual FWD		 I did a lot of start and stop driving this summer at a camp, constantly reving up the engine to slowly drive over terrible speed bumps in the road.  When I left Georgia, my average MPG was 31.3.  When I arrived back in CA, after going 63 MPH (give or take 2) the whole way, my average MPG was up to 32.7. see full Nissan Versa review
2012 4dr Sedan 109-horsepower 1.6L I4
CVT FWD		 Better than EPA estimates. Averaging 38 mpg combined - 42 mpg + on hwy. see full Nissan Versa review
2009 4dr Sedan 122-horsepower 1.8L I4
6-speed manual FWD		 34 mpg on long (3200 mile) road trip see full Nissan Versa review
2009 4dr Hatch 122-horsepower 1.8L I4
4-speed automatic FWD		 Great mileage for this car. I am consistently getting 34+ mpg on 80% highway driving. see full Nissan Versa review
2009 4dr Hatch 122-horsepower 1.8L I4
6-speed manual FWD		 Averaging 30-31 miles per gallon, mostly highway miles, lowest average was 29.12 mpg. At around 2.50 a gallon, it takes me less than $30 to fill up. Range gives for about 360 or so miles. see full Nissan Versa review
2009 4dr Hatch 122-horsepower 1.8L I4
4-speed automatic FWD		 I've never measured it, but the mileage seems to be very good. see full Nissan Versa review
2009 4dr Hatch 122-horsepower 1.8L I4
CVT FWD		 just got 44 miles per gallon on a trip with cruise control set at 65mph. I could not believe it.. This was all on flat terrain. see full Nissan Versa review
2008 4dr Hatch 122-horsepower 1.8L I4
6-speed manual FWD		 Good gas mileage, especially for the good amount of room in the front and back seats. Also,lots of cars with good mileage have poor safety ratings due to their lack of mass. The Versa has the best safety rating of the small cars, and sits up higher. see full Nissan Versa review
2008 4dr Hatch 122-horsepower 1.8L I4
6-speed manual FWD		 i loved that when i did my 1000KM Brisbane to Sydney trip i only had to fill up 1 and a half times see full Nissan Versa review
Nissan Versa Real Gas Mileage: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2008 4dr Hatch 122-horsepower 1.8L I4
CVT FWD		 Not as good as sticker read, 33 HWY is very hard to come by unless you drive every where 50 mph. see full Nissan Versa review
2008 4dr Hatch 122-horsepower 1.8L I4
6-speed manual FWD		 Anecdotally I have heard that the Versa gets significantly worse mileage than it is supposed to get (which is worse than the Fit to start with), whereas I get better mileage with my Fit than it is rated for. see full Nissan Versa review
2007 4dr Sedan 122-horsepower 1.8L I4
4-speed automatic FWD		 less than Fit see full Nissan Versa review
2007 4dr Sedan 122-horsepower 1.8L I4
CVT FWD		 poor economy for sacrifice of space, did not get promised fuel economy by 25% see full Nissan Versa review
2007 4dr Hatch 122-horsepower 1.8L I4
CVT FWD		 In a recent all highway drive over 200 miles each way I was lucky to 33 MPG (using imperial gallons) at 120 kilometres/hour. see full Nissan Versa review
2007 4dr Sedan 122-horsepower 1.8L I4
CVT FWD		 The EPA revised the fuel economy downward soon after I purchased the car, my fuel economy is very unimpressive despite careful, moderate driving habits. see full Nissan Versa review
 

TrueDelta Reviews the Real Gas Mileage of the Cadillac CTS

Cadillac CTS Real Gas Mileage: Cons
YearComment
With the 2011 528i, BMW pioneered the use of a turbocharged four-cylinder engine in a $60,000 midsize sedan on this side of the Atlantic. The point: fuel economy, specifically EPA ratings of 22 mpg city and 33 mpg highway even with all-wheel-drive (24/34 with RWD). Audi followed with an A6 2.0T good for 20/29 (25/33 with FWD) a year later. The new CTS takes the path blazed by the Germans, but much less effectively. Though the Cadillac weighs significantly less than the Audi or the BMW, its EPA ratings are lower, 19/28 (20/30 with RWD). The same is the case with the two 3.6-liter V6 engine options, even though unlike the turbo four they can be paired with an eight-speed (instead of a six-speed) automatic. The rear-drive-only Vsport barely evades the gas guzzler tax with ratings of 16/24. Even the 445-horsepower turbocharged 4.4-liter V8 in the BMW 550i does a bit better. In my real-world driving, the CTS's trip computer confirmed this shortcoming. Even considering that the outside temperature was near zero, post-warm-up averages that clustered around 18 were disappointing. Only by driving the car with a light foot could I nudge the suburban average over 20, and even then not much over. A 320-horsepower 3.0-liter 640i Grand Coupe tested a week earlier in similar conditions did at least one mpg better than the 272-horsepower, 2.0-liter Cadillac. And when I tested a 528i xDrive in slightly warmer temps it often managed 25 mpg (in an EcoPro Mode the Cadillac lacks). In one trip this BMW even touched 30. see full Cadillac CTS review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Cadillac CTS

Cadillac CTS Real Gas Mileage: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2008 4dr Sedan 304-horsepower 3.6L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic RWD		 fill for $50 on reg. today that is cheap see full Cadillac CTS review
2008 4dr Sedan 304-horsepower 3.6L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD		 23 cty & 26 hwy need i say more see full Cadillac CTS review
2008 4dr Sedan 304-horsepower 3.6L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic RWD		 Averaging 25.5 on the highway. see full Cadillac CTS review
2003 4dr Sedan 220-horsepower 3.2L V6
5-speed automatic RWD		 The fuel economy is better than expected, when driven in mixed city/highway driving. see full Cadillac CTS review
2003 4dr Sedan 220-horsepower 3.2L V6
5-speed automatic RWD		 I get 25 miles per gallon - mostly highway driving - which is reasonable for a car of this size and performance. see full Cadillac CTS review
2003 4dr Sedan 220-horsepower 3.2L V6
5-speed automatic RWD		 about 26 mpg is great....im use to driving a suv where im luckey to get 16mpg highway see full Cadillac CTS review
Cadillac CTS Real Gas Mileage: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2009 4dr Sedan supercharged 556hp 6.2L V8
6-speed shiftable automatic RWD		 14mpg is not great. However, the performance makes more than up for it. see full Cadillac CTS review
2008 4dr Sedan 304-horsepower 3.6L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD		 City mileage acceptable; Highway mileage could be better. see full Cadillac CTS review
2005 4dr Sedan 255-horsepower 3.6L V6
5-speed automatic RWD		 I get 20-21mpg on my commute which is about 70%hwy, and normally 25-27 with pure freeway driving, it just seems with technology today they could kick that up to 23-24 and 28-30 respectively. see full Cadillac CTS review
2004 4dr Sedan 255-horsepower 3.6L V6
5-speed automatic RWD		 Average at best. Yea it is a heavy car with all the safety eqipment. see full Cadillac CTS review