Nissan Versa (2007) vs. GMC Terrain (2018) Specs

vs.

◆

2007 Nissan Versa and 2018 GMC Terrain Specifications

Model Year	2007	2018
Model	Nissan Versa	GMC Terrain
Engine
Transmission
Drivetrain
Body	4dr Hatch	4dr SUV
			Difference
Wheelbase	102.4 in	107.3 in	-4.9 in
Length	169.1 in	182.3 in	-13.2 in
Width	66.7 in	72.4 in	-5.7 in
Height	60.4 in	65.4 in	-5 in
Curb Weight	2722 lb.	3449 lb.	-727 lb.
Fuel Capacity	13.2 gal.	14.9 gal.	-1.7 gal.
Headroom, Row 1	40.6 in	40.0 in	0.6 in
Shoulder Room, Row 1	53.5 in	57.2 in	-3.7 in
Hip Room, Row 1	48.8 in	54.4 in	-5.6 in
Legroom, Row 1	41.4 in	40.9 in	0.5 in
Headroom, Row 2	38.3 in	38.5 in	-0.2 in
Shoulder Room, Row 2	50.7 in	55.6 in	-4.9 in
Hip Room, Row 2	47.2 in	51.8 in	-4.6 in
Legroom, Row 2	38.0 in	39.7 in	-1.7 in
Total Legroom	79.4 in (over 2 rows)	80.6 in (over 2 rows)	-1.2 in
Cargo Volume, Minimum	17.8 ft³	29.6 ft³	-11.8 ft³
Cargo Volume, Maximum	50.4 ft³	63.3 ft³	-12.9 ft³

Return to top

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2007 Nissan Versa

2007 Nissan Versa Seat Room and Comfort: Pros
Year	Body/Powertrain	Comment
2008	4dr Hatch 122-horsepower 1.8L I4 4-speed automatic FWD	Rear seat is as large and comfortable as a traditional midsize sedan, with higher seating position. see full Nissan Versa review
2008	4dr Hatch 122-horsepower 1.8L I4 CVT FWD	There was a huge amount of rear seat leg room for a subcompact car. see full Nissan Versa review
2008	4dr Hatch 122-horsepower 1.8L I4 CVT FWD	Does not feel like a small car inside see full Nissan Versa review
2008	4dr Hatch 122-horsepower 1.8L I4 CVT FWD	Does not feel like a small car inside see full Nissan Versa review
2008	4dr Hatch 122-horsepower 1.8L I4 CVT FWD	I can comfertably drive this car for hours with no seat or room issues. I cant say the same for most cars in this class. see full Nissan Versa review
2008	4dr Hatch 122-horsepower 1.8L I4 CVT FWD	See above. see full Nissan Versa review
2008	4dr Hatch 122-horsepower 1.8L I4 CVT FWD	I can sit behind myself. Its rare for me to be able to do that in any car, let alone a compact one. see full Nissan Versa review
2008	4dr Sedan 122-horsepower 1.8L I4 CVT FWD	Nice to be in a smaller car but still have room for my longer frame . . . seats more comfortable than anticipated. see full Nissan Versa review
2008	4dr Hatch 122-horsepower 1.8L I4 6-speed manual FWD	large enough for actual adult to sit in see full Nissan Versa review
2008	4dr Hatch 122-horsepower 1.8L I4 6-speed manual FWD	I love how the Tiida/Versa has more rear leg room in it than the maxima does. a male of my build can sit in the back seat comfortably with the passenger seat pushed all the way back see full Nissan Versa review

2007 Nissan Versa Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
Year	Body/Powertrain	Comment
2007	4dr Hatch 122-horsepower 1.8L I4 4-speed automatic FWD	The seats on this were really not nice. Cheap is the word. Poor shaping, no lumbar support. They have really improved this in the new 2012 sedan, at least. It only took them 5 years. see full Nissan Versa review

TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2018 GMC Terrain

2018 GMC Terrain Seat Room and Comfort: Pros
Year	Comment
2018	The first-generation GMC Terrain took advantage of a long, 112.5-inch wheelbase to offer exceptional rear legroom--nearly 40 inches of it. On paper, the 2018 Terrain has only a half-inch less combined legroom despite a wheelbase shrink of 5.2 inches (to better align the vehicle with competitors and open up space for the downsized Acadia). In reality, rear legroom seems ample but no longer outstanding. The rear seats in the Honda CR-V and Toyota RAV4 are similarly roomy. But the Terrain does pull ahead when evaluating rear seat comfort. Its high-mounted rear seat cushion provides better leg support than others. The Compass's rear seat is lower and firmer. The Terrain's rear seat can even recline a little. Based on their specs, the Jeep is nearly as roomy inside as the GMC. Headroom, shoulder room, and combined legroom specs all differ by less than an inch. In reality, the Jeep's interior feels significantly narrower. And the Jeep Cherokee? All of its interior specs are also within an inch of the Terrain's, though often in the other direction. Why does Jeep offer two crossovers so close in size? This isn't clear. In terms of specs, they differ most in combined legroom and cargo volume. The Cherokee has 1.3 inches more of the former--good to have, but hardly justification for an additional model--and about ten percent LESS of the latter. How can the larger Jeep have less cargo volume? I suspect that the Compass was measured more creatively, and cannot actually hold as much cargo. Based on their specs--and I always take cargo volume specs with more than a little salt--the new Terrain can swallow a few more cubic feet of cargo than the Compass (63.3 vs. 59.8) but falls well short of the RAV4 (70.6 in hybrid form, 73.4 otherwise). A Honda CR-V can fit a couple more cubes than the RAV4. The GMC Terrain and the Jeeps compensate for not having the most spacious cargo areas with front passenger seats that fold forward. If your cargo is long but not wide, one of these is the way to go. Though closely related to the GMC, the Chevrolet Equinox does not offer this feature. see full GMC Terrain review

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2018 GMC Terrain

None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2018 GMC Terrain.

Be the first!

See TrueDelta's information for all Hatchbacks and Sedans.

See TrueDelta's information for all Nissan models.