Model Year | 2000 | 2012 | |
Model | Nissan Xterra | Acura MDX | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | |||
Difference | |||
Total Legroom | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in |
2000 Nissan Xterra Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2001 | 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 3.3L V6 4-speed automatic RWD |
the front seats often plenty of legroom see full Nissan Xterra review |
2001 | 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 3.3L V6 4-speed automatic RWD |
the backseat legroom is still great with teh drivers seat all the way back and with the stadium seating the rear passengers still have a great view ahead and not just the seat in front of them see full Nissan Xterra review |
2012 Acura MDX Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2012 | 4dr SUV 300-horsepower 3.7L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
The interior prioritizes appearance over actual utility; it's surprisingly cramped for such a large vehicle. For example, my Highlander is roughly the same size externally but seems downright cavernous on the inside in comparison. A rear passenger can fully stretch out in the Toyota. Not so in the Acura. see full Acura MDX review |