| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2014 Nissan 370Z and 2013 Acura MDX Specifications
| Model Year | 2014 | 2013 | |
| Model | Nissan 370Z | Acura MDX | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 2dr Hatch | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,550 mm | 2,751 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,247 mm | 4,867 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,849 mm | 1,994 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,318 mm | 1,732 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,466 kg | 2,064 kg | -1 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 72 L | 79 L | -7 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 970 mm | 996 mm | -26 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,382 mm | 1,565 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,387 mm | 1,499 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,090 mm | 1,046 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 0 mm | 980 mm | -980 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 0 mm | 1,562 mm | -1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 0 mm | 1,501 mm | -1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 0 mm | 983 mm | -983 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 953 mm | -953 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,450 mm | -1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,067 mm | -1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 739 mm | -739 mm |
| Total Legroom | 1,090 mm (over 1 row) | 2,769 mm (over 3 rows) | -1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 195 L | 425 L | -230 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 6.9 | 1,215 L | 5.9 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 6.9 | 2,364 L | 4.9 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Nissan 370Z
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2014 Nissan 370Z.
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Acura MDX
| 2013 Acura MDX Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| That's it for the significant advantages of the new Acura MDX. Most things it does well, but not significantly better than the generally good segment averages. It's quick, but not thrillingly so. The front seats are comfortable and supportive, and cushier than those in the Infiniti, but provide less lateral support than those in the smaller Acura RDX and are no match in comfort or support for those in a BMW X5, a Lexus RX, or the big buck Mercedes reviewed a few weeks ago. Ride quality, like the seats, is good but short of luxurious. With additional sound deadening and laminated front door glass, the 2014 MDX is quieter than the 2013, but this only brings it in line with the others. By the same token, there aren't many clear reasons to reject the 2014 MDX. The most obvious follows from its relatively compact size: though (as already mentioned) cargo volume is more than competitive, there's less room in the rearmost row than in the QX60. By sliding the second row up a couple of inches (it has a half-foot of travel), adults of middling size will fit back there. But with their butt low and knees high they won't be comfortable. The QX60 offers far more combined legroom based on the spec sheets, and a couple more inches in the real world. (The Acura's specs seem to under-represent reality for passengers even as they might over-represent it for cargo.) But the Infiniti's seats are flatter and less comfortable. The new Hyundai Santa Fe offers more legroom than the Infiniti, while Ford's large crossovers could be best of all for transporting up to seven adults--if still not as good as the typical minivan. see full Acura MDX review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Acura MDX
| 2013 Acura MDX Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 4dr SUV 300-horsepower 3.7L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
The interior prioritizes appearance over actual utility; it's surprisingly cramped for such a large vehicle. For example, my Highlander is roughly the same size externally but seems downright cavernous on the inside in comparison. A rear passenger can fully stretch out in the Toyota. Not so in the Acura. see full Acura MDX review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Hatchbacks and Convertibles.
See TrueDelta's information for all Nissan models.
