| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2010 Pontiac Vibe and 2016 Chevrolet Malibu Specifications
| Model Year | 2010 | 2016 | |
| Model | Pontiac Vibe | Chevrolet Malibu | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr Hatch | 4dr Sedan | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 102.4 in | 111.4 in | -9 in |
| Length | 171.1 in | 193.8 in | -22.7 in |
| Width | 69.5 in | 73.0 in | -3.5 in |
| Height | 61.0 in | 57.7 in | 3.3 in |
| Curb Weight | 2856 lb. | 3086 lb. | -230 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 13.0 gal. | 13.0 gal. | 0 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 40.5 in | 39.1 in | 1.4 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 53.3 in | 58.5 in | -5.2 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 52.3 in | 54.1 in | -1.8 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 41.6 in | 42.0 in | -0.4 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 39.4 in | 37.5 in | 1.9 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 52.6 in | 57.1 in | -4.5 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 43.7 in | 53.4 in | -9.7 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 36.2 in | 38.1 in | -1.9 in |
| Total Legroom | 77.8 in (over 2 rows) | 80.1 in (over 2 rows) | -2.3 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 20.1 ft3 | 15.8 ft3 | 4.3 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 49.4 ft3 | 15.8 ft3 | 33.6 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 Pontiac Vibe
| 2010 Pontiac Vibe Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2009 | 4dr Hatch 132-horsepower 1.8L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
There is no rear seat room or comfort unless you are a less than 5 ft tall child. see full Pontiac Vibe review |
| 2009 | 4dr Hatch 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
compared to my sons beamer i like the higher more cushioned feel.this car is higher in design than any ive seen.the gt leather seats sort of wrap around you-very comfotable see full Pontiac Vibe review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Chevrolet Malibu
| 2016 Chevrolet Malibu Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2016 | Chevrolet's designers styled the new Malibu's instrument panel to appear low and out of the way, such that the front seat feels especially roomy and the view forward seems more open than in most competitors, including the Kia (the instrument panel in which seems significantly higher and more imposing). In the tested car, which had every option except the panoramic sunroof, headroom was so abundant I could have worn a fedora. The Kia Optima might have as much front headroom when similarly without a sunroof. The official specs, which often don't reflect real world differences, suggest it should have even more than the Malibu. But you cannot get a highly equipped Optima without the sunroof, as it's part of a large package on the SX and standard on the SX Limited. Though the Malibu's windshield is relatively large, you won't find outward visibility among the reasons to buy one. The Chevrolet's front pillars remain on the thick side, its instrument panel is considerably deeper than the Kia's, and the view to the sides and rear also could be more open. In the Optima, the view to the sides is more open but that to the rear is not. I did find the Cherolet's front seats more form-fitting and comfortable than the Optima's. The Kia's quilted seats aren't as cushy as they appear. see full Chevrolet Malibu review | |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Chevrolet Malibu
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Chevrolet Malibu.
See TrueDelta's information for all Hatchbacks
See TrueDelta's information for all Pontiac models.
