Saab 9-3 (2010) vs. Volkswagen Golf / GTI (2017) Specs
How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2010 Saab 9-3 and 2017 Volkswagen Golf / GTI specs.
2010 Saab 9-3 and 2017 Volkswagen Golf / GTI Specifications
Model Year |
2010 |
2017 |
|
Model |
Saab 9-3 |
Volkswagen Golf / GTI |
|
Engine |
|
|
|
Transmission |
|
|
|
Drivetrain |
|
|
|
Body |
4dr Wagon |
4dr Wagon |
|
|
|
|
Difference |
Wheelbase |
2,675 mm |
2,629 mm |
0 mm |
Length |
4,653 mm |
4,562 mm |
0 mm |
Width |
1,763 mm |
1,798 mm |
0 mm |
Height |
1,539 mm |
1,481 mm |
0 mm |
Curb Weight |
1,506 kg |
1,389 kg |
0 kg |
Fuel Capacity |
62 L |
50 L |
12 L |
Headroom, Row 1 |
988 mm |
980 mm |
8 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 |
1,430 mm |
1,420 mm |
0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 |
1,074 mm |
1,046 mm |
0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 |
940 mm |
980 mm |
-40 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 |
1,400 mm |
1,369 mm |
0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 |
892 mm |
904 mm |
-12 mm |
Total Legroom |
1,966 mm (over 2 rows) |
1,951 mm (over 2 rows) |
0 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum |
841 L |
861 L |
-20 L |
Cargo Volume, Maximum |
2,047 L |
1,883 L |
1 L |
Return to top
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 Saab 9-3
2010 Saab 9-3 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons |
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2009 |
4dr Sedan turbocharged 210hp 2.0L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Limited knee room in front with rear facing car seat behind.
see full Saab 9-3 review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2017 Volkswagen Golf / GTI
2016 |
As I've noted before (when reviewing the e-Golf), the seventh-generation Golf's front seats are shaped and padded to provide nearly ideal comfort and support in daily driving. The CX-5's driver seat also fit me well, but not quite as well as the Volkswagen's.
Compared to other compact hatchbacks and its ancestors, the current Golf has a roomy rear seat. I can sit behind my 5-9 self with about five inches of air ahead of my knees. Unless unusually tall people populate both rows, the amount of space should be beyond adequate.
Compare the Golf SportWagen's rear seat to that in the CX-5, and a funny thing happens. On paper, the Mazda provides about 3.5 more inches of legroom. When sitting behind myself in both vehicles, though, I had about half as much space ahead of my knees in the CX-5. I've noticed in the past that VW measures rear legroom very conservatively, and apparently they continue to do so. The Golf's interior is roomier than the official specs suggest. Plus its rear seat passengers get air vents. The Mazda's do not.
This said, I'm not entirely comfortable in the Golf SportWagen's rear seat. To me it feels overly reclined. In neither the GSW nor the CX-5 is the degree of recline adjustable. It is in some compact crossovers.
see full Volkswagen Golf / GTI review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2017 Volkswagen Golf / GTI