Subaru Forester Subaru Forester 2014 Nissan *CL55 AMG Nissan *CL55 AMG 2006

We are 103,000+ car owners sharing real-world car information.

Join Us

Subaru Forester (2014) vs. Nissan *CL55 AMG (2006) Specs

How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2014 Subaru Forester and 2006 Nissan *CL55 AMG specs.

2014 Subaru Forester and 2006 Nissan *CL55 AMG Specifications

Model Year 2014 2006  
Model Subaru Forester Nissan *CL55 AMG  
Engine  
Transmission  
Drivetrain  
Body  
      Difference
Total Legroom 0 in (over 1 rows) 0 in (over 1 rows) 0 in

Return to top

TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Subaru Forester

2014 Subaru Forester Seat Room and Comfort: Pros
YearComment
2014 Beyond visibility, people buy crossovers to get more space for people and cargo. As in previous Subaru Foresters, the 2014's ceiling is cathedral-high. I could have worn a top hat inside. If you're very tall, and have been seeking a compact vehicle in which you'll easily fit, you've found one. If, on the other hand, you've been seeking expansive elbow room, the Honda CR-V has more of it. And legroom? A combined (first and second row) figure of 81 inches tops every other compact SUV, including the otherwise segment-leading Honda (79.6 inches) and Toyota RAV-4 (79.8 inches). The Chevrolet Equinox offers another tenth of an inch, but with a 188-inch length (vs. the Forester's 181) and 4,083-pound curb weight (vs. the Forester 2.5i's 3,366) it's not truly compact. Subaru has worked no such miracles with shoulder room. At 56.5 inches, the Forester's is typical of the compact crossover class. Add in a small driveline hump (absent in the Honda) and three adults won't happily share the rear seat for long. But how many car owners put three adult-sized people in the second row for long, anyway? Measurements don't tell the entire story. The Honda's rear seat cushion is too low to the floor to provide adults with thigh support, and its rear seatback can be reclined to only two nearly identical positions. In constrast, the Forester's passengers enjoy a comfortably high rear seat that reclines through a broader range. One negative for rear seat comfort: unlike the Ford Escape (but like nearly all other compact crossovers, including the CR-V), the Forester has no rear air vents. Thanks to the tall, square rear body, cargo space is also the best in the segment, though not by as large a margin as the rear seat. Up front, there are plenty of bins in which to stash your stuff. see full Subaru Forester review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Subaru Forester

2014 Subaru Forester Seat Room and Comfort: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2015 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L H4
CVT AWD
I'm 6'3" and often don't fit comfortable in vehicles. I found this had a very nice amount of front seat room. The center console tends to stay out of the way as well, some newer designs have the center stack moving into where my right knee would be. It's a very noticeable improvement over my previous 2009 Escape. I actually found the Forester more comfortable for me than the Outback. I was expecting the opposite. see full Subaru Forester review
2015 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L H4
CVT AWD
After looking at Explorer's, I was surprised how much more room the Forester had in the back seat. Granted it doesn't have a third row, but if you don't need a 3rd row, the Forester is hard to beat in this segment for rear seat room. We can put a forward facing child seat in the back, move the front seat up a about 2 inches from all the way back and there's still plenty of front passenger room and my 1.5 year old son can't kick the back of the seat. see full Subaru Forester review
2014 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L H4
CVT AWD
Excellent rear seat comfort and rear seats are 60/ 40 and easy to fold flat. rear seats also have recline function which is nice ... excellent leg room see full Subaru Forester review
2014 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L H4
CVT AWD
Huge rear seat for the car's size see full Subaru Forester review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2006 Nissan *CL55 AMG

2006 Nissan *CL55 AMG Seat Room and Comfort: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2007 4dr Hatch 122-horsepower 1.8L I4
6-speed manual FWD
Best in class, even better than the much larger Altima. see full Nissan *CL55 AMG review
2007 4dr Hatch 122-horsepower 1.8L I4
6-speed manual FWD
Memory foam in the seats enhances comfort, along with well-positioned head restraints and wide seating surfaces. see full Nissan *CL55 AMG review
2007 4dr Hatch 122-horsepower 1.8L I4
4-speed automatic FWD
Seating is not so low and cramped as most see full Nissan *CL55 AMG review
2007 4dr Hatch 122-horsepower 1.8L I4
CVT FWD
A lot of leg room and cup holders provided as well. see full Nissan *CL55 AMG review
2007 4dr Hatch 122-horsepower 1.8L I4
CVT FWD
The rear seat room was the first attraction to the car and we ended up comparing it to larger cars. Adults are perfectly comfortable in the rear of this car, more so than larger cars. see full Nissan *CL55 AMG review
2007 4dr Sedan 122-horsepower 1.8L I4
CVT FWD
Rear seat room is actually comfortable for people over 6 ft tall see full Nissan *CL55 AMG review
2007 4dr Hatch 122-horsepower 1.8L I4
4-speed automatic FWD
Comfortable & wide seating, almost as good as our newer 2008 CRV AWD, for both driver & passenger. Centre console area is small & could be better designed, especially cup holder & 12 volt power outlet. see full Nissan *CL55 AMG review
2007 4dr Hatch 122-horsepower 1.8L I4
4-speed automatic FWD
Excellent legrooms & headrests for 2 adult passengers, 3rd. person is fine for shorter trip as ours is mainly a solo driven commuter car most of the time. Seatback folds almost flat forward for larger packages (great for shopping at IKEA) see full Nissan *CL55 AMG review
2007 4dr Hatch 122-horsepower 1.8L I4
CVT FWD
Car feels much bigger than it is. see full Nissan *CL55 AMG review
2007 4dr Hatch 122-horsepower 1.8L I4
CVT FWD
Back seat leg room is exceptional for a small car. see full Nissan *CL55 AMG review
2006 Nissan *CL55 AMG Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2007 4dr Hatch 122-horsepower 1.8L I4
4-speed automatic FWD
The seats on this were really not nice. Cheap is the word. Poor shaping, no lumbar support. They have really improved this in the new 2012 sedan, at least. It only took them 5 years. see full Nissan *CL55 AMG review
 
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Subaru models.