

Page 2 of 2 | ||
Page 2 of 2 |
2004 Subaru Forester Pros and Cons Member4380 |
|
2010 Subaru Forester Pros and Cons A member in Illinois, United States |
|
2010 Subaru Forester Pros and Cons Member4282 Once warmed up the engine is smooth strong and relatively quiet at all speeds. |
|
2007 Subaru Forester Pros and Cons A member in Alabama, United States Underpowered wen loaded and attempting to negotiate highways. |
|
2007 Subaru Forester Pros and Cons Member826 |
|
Looking to trade in your vehicle? Get an estimate of how much it's worth.
| |
2010 Subaru Forester Pros and Cons Member3261 Subaru All Wheel Drive. |
|
2009 Subaru Forester Pros and Cons Member3882 Very quick for a small SUV, with no perceptible turbo lag at all. Leaves the Honda CR-V for dead |
|
2010 Subaru Forester Pros and Cons Member3243 best on the market : AWD is a marvel |
|
2003 Subaru Forester Pros and Cons Member3207 Very peppy for an SUV, feels like a small sports car. Stick like glue to the road witht he AWD system |
|
2002 Subaru Forester Pros and Cons Member3209 Reliable and bulletproof design |
|
2009 Subaru Forester Pros and Cons Member977 All wheel drive great in snow and off-road, high clearance, plenty of power with base engine for most situations. |
|
| |
2009 Subaru Forester Pros and Cons Member2592 Adequate, not terribly exciting. Gets the job done. |
|
2009 Subaru Forester Pros and Cons Member2692 Smooth running engine, satisfying gear level actuation, well spaced ratios, better fuel economy than previous Subarus owned, permanent all-wheel drive a must in snowy Quebec city, reliability (based on past experiece) |
|
2009 Subaru Forester Pros and Cons Member2366 Good responsive motor, lovely AT operating modes, including the ability to "lock" it into 2nd gear for slippery starts. |
|
2007 Subaru Forester Pros and Cons Member1704 Smooth, more than adequate power, good shift points on AT, decent mileage for AWD. |
|
2009 Subaru Forester Pros and Cons A member in Minnesota, United States solid, effective, reliable, efficient, solid without being harsh or overly noisy even when passing or towing |
|
2004 Subaru Forester Pros and Cons A member in Wisconsin, United States For a 4-cylinder motor, it has decent low-end torque. The turbo performance is eye-opening for this type of vehicle. |
|
2008 Subaru Forester Pros and Cons Member1446 Its performance feels responsive and zippy - it has lots of get-up and go for a 4-cylinder. |
|
2009 Subaru Forester Pros and Cons Member2063 Less lag than most turbos, sufficient power for freeway passing and on hills. |
|
2004 Subaru Forester Pros and Cons Member1711 overall good engine (rackety when cold), fair overall performance, good balance btwn performance and fuel economy. |
|
2003 Subaru Forester Pros and Cons SPG900NY 165hp non-turbo engine combined with the automatic transmission is very slow, and feels very sluggish. The automatic often hunts for gears, and when punching the throttle to get kickdown, transmission is slow to shift. Was the same when new. |
|
2004 Subaru Forester Pros and Cons Member714 Good performance at reasonable cost. AWD very useful in current climate |
|
2007 Subaru Forester Pros and Cons Member104 It has VERY strong acceleration in 2nd thru 4th gears (20-70mph). First gear runs out of rpm quickly. I can easily outrun many "sporty" cars and then pull off-road and not get stuck in mud or snow. |