Subaru Legacy (2016) vs. Ford Mustang (2003) Specs
How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2016 Subaru Legacy and 2003 Ford Mustang specs.
2016 Subaru Legacy and 2003 Ford Mustang Specifications
| Model Year |
2016 |
2003 |
|
| Model |
Subaru Legacy |
Ford Mustang |
|
| Engine |
|
|
|
| Transmission |
|
|
|
| Drivetrain |
|
|
|
| Body |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Difference |
| Total Legroom |
0 in (over 1 rows) |
0 in (over 1 rows) |
0 in |
Return to top
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Subaru Legacy
| 2015 |
Along with the Honda Accord, Hyundai Sonata, and Volkswagen Passat, the Subaru Legacy has one of the roomiest rear seats in the segment. Rear seat passengers have a couple inches less knee room in the Ford Fusion. The rear seats in the Chrysler and Buick are tighter still.
This said, especially with the optional sunroof rear seat headroom is somewhat limited. People taller than six feet might come into contact with the headliner.
The top trim level includes rear air vents.
see full Subaru Legacy review |
| 2016 Subaru Legacy Seat Room and Comfort: Cons |
| Year | Comment |
|
The front seats have an unusually high bulge just below my shoulder blades. This feels more odd than uncomfortable, at least to me. Partly depending on your height your experience might vary. These seats also provide very little lateral support, which admittedly isn't much of an issue given the limited grippiness of the tires.
I had no such qualms with the armrest on the door. It's wide and cushy.
In the front seats' favor, for 2015 Subaru has added fore-aft adjustability to the headrests, a rarity in recent moderately priced cars.
see full Subaru Legacy review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Subaru Legacy
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Subaru Legacy.
Be the first!
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2003 Ford Mustang
| 2003 |
2dr Convertible 190-horsepower 3.8L V6
4-speed automatic RWD |
The existence of a rear seat, comfortable or not, was a major factor.
see full Ford Mustang review |
| 2003 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons |
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2003 |
2dr Convertible 190-horsepower 3.8L V6
4-speed automatic RWD |
Front seats are not particularly comfortable but not so different from most cars I've driven. I've already bought seat cushions. I've put long days on a bicycle I ride regularly which is more comfortable than anything between a vintage VW Beetle and a modern Buick with the exception of a Renault 16. In fact most car makers would do well to go out and find a 1972 Renault 16 and take very, very careful note of the seats.
But seat comfort was secondary to other considerations such as water-tightness of the convertible. Not a deal-breaker.
see full Ford Mustang review |
See TrueDelta's information for all
Sedans and
Wagons.
See TrueDelta's information for all
Subaru models.
