We are 103,000+ car owners sharing real-world car information.

Join Us

Suzuki Forenza / Reno vs. Ford C-MAX Fuel Economy (L/100km)

Chart is based on 60 fuel economy reports for the Suzuki Forenza / Reno and 179 fuel economy reports for the Ford C-MAX.

Suzuki Forenza / Reno L/100km

Suzuki Forenza / Reno Suzuki Forenza / Reno 2008 9.5 MPG Highway Percentage 30 percent Suzuki Forenza / Reno Suzuki Forenza / Reno 2007 9.1 MPG Highway Percentage 30 percent Suzuki Forenza / Reno Suzuki Forenza / Reno 2006 11.0 MPG Highway Percentage 21 percent Suzuki Forenza / Reno Suzuki Forenza / Reno 2006 9.3 MPG Highway Percentage 44 percent Suzuki Forenza / Reno Suzuki Forenza / Reno 2005 10.3 MPG Highway Percentage 48 percent
Year Body/Powertrain flat, hilly, or mountainousLand driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot A/C use: none to heavyA/C constant stop and goTraf % many stops per mileCity % stop every mile or twoSub % fairly steady speedHwy % Hwy Spd L/100km
2008 4dr Hatch 127-horsepower 2.0L I4
4-speed automatic FWD
flat light none 20 20 30 30 65 9.5  
2007 4dr Hatch 127-horsepower 2.0L I4
5-speed manual FWD
flat med hvy 10 25 35 30 75 9.1  
2006 4dr Sedan 126-horsepower 2.0L I4
5-speed manual FWD
hills med light 15 63 2 21 64 11.0  
2006 4dr Sedan 126-horsepower 2.0L I4
4-speed automatic FWD
flat med light 8 23 25 44 74 9.3  
2005 4dr Hatch 126-horsepower 2.0L I4
4-speed automatic FWD
flat light none 10 19 24 48 100 10.3  

Return to top

Ford C-MAX L/100km

Ford C-MAX Ford C-MAX 2017 6.8 MPG Highway Percentage 47 percent Ford C-MAX Ford C-MAX 2015 5.4 MPG Highway Percentage 19 percent Ford C-MAX Ford C-MAX 2014 3.4 MPG Highway Percentage 50 percent Ford C-MAX Ford C-MAX 2013 3.7 MPG Highway Percentage 21 percent Ford C-MAX Ford C-MAX 2013 5.5 MPG Highway Percentage 46 percent
Year Body/Powertrain flat, hilly, or mountainousLand driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot A/C use: none to heavyA/C constant stop and goTraf % many stops per mileCity % stop every mile or twoSub % fairly steady speedHwy % Hwy Spd L/100km
2017 4dr Hatch 141-horsepower 2.0L I4 Hybrid
CVT FWD
flat light none 0 0 53 47 69 6.8  
2015 4dr Hatch 141-horsepower 2.0L I4 Hybrid
CVT FWD
flat light light 24 37 21 19 66 5.4  
2014 4dr Hatch 141-horsepower 2.0L I4 Plug-in Hybrid
CVT FWD
flat light none 0 20 30 50 65 3.4  
2013 4dr Hatch 141-horsepower 2.0L I4 Plug-in Hybrid
CVT FWD
flat light light 17 21 42 21 70 3.7  
2013 4dr Hatch 141-horsepower 2.0L I4 Hybrid
CVT FWD
flat light light 1 18 35 46 63 5.5  

Return to top

This page shows only averages. See all the Ford C-MAX fuel economy data.

Suzuki Forenza / Reno vs. Ford C-MAX Fuel Economy (L/100km)

Unlike other fuel economy surveys, TrueDelta's Real-World Gas Mileage Survey includes questions about how and where a car was driven. So you can get an idea of the Suzuki Forenza / Reno and Ford C-MAX's where a car was driven. So you can get an idea of their real-world L/100km based on how and where you drive a car.

See TrueDelta's information for all Sedans, Wagons, and Hatchbacks.
See TrueDelta's information for all Suzuki models and Ford models.

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Suzuki Forenza / Reno

Suzuki Forenza / Reno Real Gas Mileage: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2007 4dr Hatch 127-horsepower 2.0L I4
4-speed automatic FWD
In general for the size of the car and the way I drive, I feel like I get lower gas mileage, 20-23 MPG on average, than I expected, however, it is rated for 18-28 MPG. see full Suzuki Forenza / Reno review
2006 4dr Sedan 126-horsepower 2.0L I4
5-speed manual FWD
It can get up to 31 mpg on highway-only driving. On the mostly short, in-town driving i do, it gets a disappointing 22 mpg. see full Suzuki Forenza / Reno review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the 2001 Ford C-MAX

None of our members have yet commented on the real gas mileage of the 2001 Ford C-MAX.

Be the first!