| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2006 Toyota 4Runner and 2015 Ford Mustang Specifications
| Model Year | 2006 | 2015 | |
| Model | Toyota 4Runner | Ford Mustang | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 2dr Coupe | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,789 mm | 2,720 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,806 mm | 4,783 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,910 mm | 1,915 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,760 mm | 1,382 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,835 kg | 1,599 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 87 L | 61 L | 26 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,008 mm | 955 mm | -954 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,473 mm | 1,430 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,405 mm | 1,394 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,062 mm | 1,067 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 993 mm | 884 mm | 109 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,453 mm | 1,326 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,407 mm | 1,204 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 879 mm | 777 mm | 102 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 836 mm | 0 mm | 836 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,440 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,229 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 612 mm | 0 mm | 612 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,553 mm (over 3 rows) | 1,844 mm (over 2 rows) | 1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 340 L | 382 L | -42 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 1,036 L | 13.5 | -12.5 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 2,127 L | 13.5 | -11.5 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2006 Toyota 4Runner
| 2006 Toyota 4Runner Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2006 | 4dr SUV 236-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic 4WD w/low range |
Lots of room in the backs seat, and actually decent 3rd row seating for the kids. Kills the cargo area though. see full Toyota 4Runner review |
| 2005 | 4dr SUV 245-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic 4WD w/low range |
Plenty of room for 3 people. see full Toyota 4Runner review |
| 2006 Toyota 4Runner Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2007 | 4dr SUV 236-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic 4WD w/low range |
This is a vehicle designed for people 5 fett 11 inches and under - no two ways about it. If you are 5 feel 11 or over you will not enjoy this truck. see full Toyota 4Runner review |
| 2007 | 4dr SUV 236-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic 4WD w/low range |
The consequence of reducing overall height while maintaining trail worthy obstacle clearance is a relatively low to floor seating position more attune to sedans. Seats are comfortable though even for a big framed person. see full Toyota 4Runner review |
| 2007 | 4dr SUV 236-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic 4WD w/low range |
Seat position low to floor leaves you sitting with a knee high position. Seats itself are comfortable, but there is no space for your feet under the front seats. All floor surfaces are almost flat though considering it truck roots. see full Toyota 4Runner review |
| 2007 | 4dr SUV 236-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic 4WD w/low range |
Not a power seat. Cannot get it into an optimum adjustment. see full Toyota 4Runner review |
| 2007 | 4dr SUV 236-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic RWD |
No third row, cargo space small see full Toyota 4Runner review |
| 2006 | 4dr SUV 236-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic 4WD w/low range |
After a trip to TX from CO my back was hurting. see full Toyota 4Runner review |
| 2006 | 4dr SUV 236-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic RWD |
the front seat is too close to the floor. see full Toyota 4Runner review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Ford Mustang
| 2015 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| This "why not" should not come as a surprise. Neither the Mustang nor the Audi has much rear legroom. Plus in the Mustang my head was pressed against the rear window, and I'm only 5-9. The Mustang coupe's rear seat is viable only for people up to 5-6 or so in height. The Audi has a little more rear headroom. As does the Mustang convertible. If you will be putting people into the rear seat of the Mustang, you should turn off the "easy entry" feature. When it's activated, this feature automatically motors the seat backward when the engine is shut off, reducing rear legroom to near zero. I was nearly trapped when I turned the engine off while sitting in the back seat to take photos. If you want a V8-powered coupe with a roomy rear seat, get a Dodge Challenger. Both the Mustang and the RS 5 do a better job of transporting luggage than rear seat passengers. Both trunks have about as much capacity as that of the average compact sedan. see full Ford Mustang review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Ford Mustang
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Ford Mustang.
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Toyota models.
