Model Year | 2015 | 2006 | |
Model | Toyota 4Runner | Ford Mustang | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr SUV | 2dr Coupe | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 109.8 in | 107.1 in | 2.7 in |
Length | 190.2 in | 187.6 in | 2.6 in |
Width | 75.8 in | 73.9 in | 1.9 in |
Height | 71.5 in | 55.4 in | 16.1 in |
Curb Weight | 4400 lb. | 3373 lb. | 1027 lb. |
Fuel Capacity | 23.0 gal. | 16.0 gal. | 7 gal. |
Headroom, Row 1 | 39.3 in | 38.6 in | 0.7 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 57.8 in | 55.4 in | 2.4 in |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 56.5 in | 53.6 in | 2.9 in |
Legroom, Row 1 | 41.7 in | 42.7 in | -1 in |
Headroom, Row 2 | 38.6 in | 34.7 in | 3.9 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 57.8 in | 53.4 in | 4.4 in |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 55.7 in | 46.8 in | 8.9 in |
Legroom, Row 2 | 32.9 in | 30.3 in | 2.6 in |
Headroom, Row 3 | 34.3 in | 0.0 in | 34.3 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 57.7 in | 0.0 in | 57.7 in |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 43.3 in | 0.0 in | 43.3 in |
Legroom, Row 3 | 29.3 in | 0.0 in | 29.3 in |
Total Legroom | 103.9 in (over 3 rows) | 73 in (over 2 rows) | 30.9 in |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 9.0 ft3 | 13.1 ft3 | -4.1 ft3 |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 46.3 ft3 | 13.1 | 33.2 ft3 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 88.8 ft3 | 13.1 ft3 | 75.7 ft3 |
2015 Toyota 4Runner Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Comment | |
2014 | Both the Toyota and Jeep have roomy second-row seats that are high enough off the floor to provide thigh support for adults. Only the Toyota offers an optional third row seat, but it's too tight to be of much use. If you want a useful third row in this sort of vehicle, check out the Dodge Durango. The Durango is essentially an extended, less off-road-capable Grand Cherokee. Its third-row seat is about as comfortable as you'll find in this size SUV or crossover. see full Toyota 4Runner review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Toyota 4Runner.
2006 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2006 | 2dr Convertible 300-horsepower 4.6L V8 5-speed automatic RWD |
seat is comfortable can be adjusted to suit your choice of position all controls are within easy reach see full Ford Mustang review |
2005 | 2dr Convertible 210-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic RWD |
Driving position is very flexible, all the controls are within reach and easy to use. see full Ford Mustang review |
2005 | 2dr Coupe 210-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic RWD |
Plenty of leg room for tall people like me. see full Ford Mustang review |
2006 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2007 | 2dr Coupe 210-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed manual RWD |
While our present government may blow off the standards & principles of the Geneva Convention, I still find them worthy enough to abide. Mustang rear seats are in clear violation. see full Ford Mustang review |
2005 | 2dr Coupe 210-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed manual RWD |
The Mustang is a cool car, but nowhere near as comfortable see full Ford Mustang review |
2005 | 2dr Coupe 210-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed manual RWD |
Not much room in the back of a Mustang... see full Ford Mustang review |
2005 | 2dr Coupe 300-horsepower 4.6L V8 5-speed manual RWD |
Rear seat is small for adults. see full Ford Mustang review |
2005 | 2dr Convertible 300-horsepower 4.6L V8 5-speed automatic RWD |
Rear seat is for kids. see full Ford Mustang review |
2005 | 2dr Convertible 300-horsepower 4.6L V8 5-speed automatic RWD |
Rear seats in name only. No real passenger room see full Ford Mustang review |