| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2008 Toyota Camry and 2017 Toyota Prius Specifications
| Model Year | 2008 | 2017 | |
| Model | Toyota Camry | Toyota Prius | |
| Engine | 2.4L I4 Hybrid DOHC-4v 187 hp@6000 137 lb-ft@4000 |
1.8L I4 Hybrid DOHC-4v 95 hp@5200 105 lb-ft@3600 |
|
| Transmission | CVT | CVT | |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD | |
| Body | 4dr Sedan | 4dr Hatch | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 109.3 in | 106.3 in | 3 in |
| Length | 189.2 in | 178.7 in | 10.5 in |
| Width | 71.1 in | 69.3 in | 1.8 in |
| Height | 57.9 in | 58.1 in | -0.2 in |
| Curb Weight | 3680 lb. | 3075 lb. | 605 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 18.5 gal. | 11.3 gal. | 7.2 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 38.8 in | 39.4 in | -0.6 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 57.8 in | 55.0 in | 2.8 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 54.6 in | 53.4 in | 1.2 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 41.7 in | 43.2 in | -1.5 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 37.8 in | 37.4 in | 0.4 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 56.9 in | 53.0 in | 3.9 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 53.9 in | 51.9 in | 2 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 38.3 in | 33.4 in | 4.9 in |
| Total Legroom | 80 in (over 2 rows) | 76.6 in (over 2 rows) | 3.4 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 15.0 ft3 | 24.6 ft3 | -9.6 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 15.0 ft3 | 62.7 ft3 | -47.7 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2008 Toyota Camry
| 2008 Toyota Camry Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2009 | 4dr Sedan 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed automatic FWD |
excellent legroom see full Toyota Camry review |
| 2009 | 4dr Sedan 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed automatic FWD |
very comfortable on long and short trips see full Toyota Camry review |
| 2008 | 4dr Sedan 268-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
more comfortable than Accord and Nissan see full Toyota Camry review |
| 2007 | 4dr Sedan 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed automatic FWD |
Big and comfy. see full Toyota Camry review |
| 2007 | 4dr Sedan 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed automatic FWD |
Big and comfy. see full Toyota Camry review |
| 2007 | 4dr Sedan 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed automatic FWD |
Rear seat is large and lots of leg room. Nice feature is the center armrest, which many cars in this price range do not have. see full Toyota Camry review |
| 2007 | 4dr Sedan 187-horsepower 2.4L I4 Hybrid CVT FWD |
Very big seat area for a big person. Easy to get in and out of. see full Toyota Camry review |
| 2007 | 4dr Sedan 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed automatic FWD |
I have arthritis and it is great to have a seat that i can lower and slide way back. Not just great - it was important in the purchase decision. . see full Toyota Camry review |
| 2008 Toyota Camry Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2009 | 4dr Sedan 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed automatic FWD |
Just could not get comfortable. see full Toyota Camry review |
| 2008 | 4dr Sedan 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed automatic FWD |
Front seat comfort is another subjective measurement. Our experience driving our 06 and 08 Accords has been that we feel little discomfort or back pain during long trips. We did have more such problems with our 05 and 06 rentals, although not severe. see full Toyota Camry review |
| 2007 | 4dr Sedan 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed automatic FWD |
These seats seem to have been designed for someone 250 pounds. Wide, flat, and no proper support for your back. While this has a lumbar support for the driver, the poor seat design makes this uncomfortable for long trips. see full Toyota Camry review |
| 2007 | 4dr Sedan 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed automatic FWD |
It could not seat three adults, while the Ford could easily seat three large people, and give them limo-like legroom. see full Toyota Camry review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2017 Toyota Prius
| 2017 Toyota Prius Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2016 | For a compact hatchback, the new Toyota Prius feels very roomy inside. It helps that the tall, sloping console of the third-generation Prius has been replaced by one with a much less intrusive (if also less sporty) design. The deep instrument panel is scooped out on top, while the windshield is large and distant. The view forward from the driver seat is very open, but anyone who isn't a goldfish will find it unusual. It's like driving a spaceship, in two senses. Or a small minivan. The Ford C-MAX has a crossover-like driving position and the most comfortable seats. The front seats in the Prius are nicely shaped, but less firm. Those in the Volt could use more contour. I found the Civic's front seats somewhat uncomfortable. The Volt feels far tighter inside. Up front the windshield seems far smaller than that in the Prius. The back seat, while its cushion is comfortably positioned, threatens to induce claustrophobia. Both the Prius and the Volt have restricted visbility to the sides and especially to the rear. The view is much better from the driver seat in the C-MAX. see full Toyota Prius review | |
| 2017 Toyota Prius Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| Rear seat passengers in the Prius have far more knee room than those in the Volt, and feel far less closed in. Despite a low-mounted seat cushion, though, headroom is limited. Rear seat passengers in the C-MAX enjoy a much more comfortably positioned seat cushion, significantly more headroom, and better outward visibility. see full Toyota Prius review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2017 Toyota Prius
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2017 Toyota Prius.
See TrueDelta's information for all Sedans
See TrueDelta's information for all Toyota models.
