| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
Toyota Celica vs. Mazda CX-5 Powertrain and Chassis Reliability by Model Generation
Results are for year ending June 30, 2018. Only successfully completed repairs are currently included in the analysis. Routine maintenance, most wear items, recalls, and problems fixed with just a reflash or warning light reset are not included.
| Year and Model | % of Average Repair Frequency | |
 2017 - 2018 Mazda CX-5 |
Best
25%
Worst
|
See problems for this generation Share on Facebook |
 2016 Mazda CX-5 |
Best
11%
Worst
|
See problems for this generation Share on Facebook |
 2013 - 2015 Mazda CX-5 |
Best
32%
Worst
|
See problems for this generation Share on Facebook |
|
Looking for a warranty? Get a quote.
| ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Reliability And Durability of the Toyota Celica
| Toyota Celica Reliability And Durability: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2002 | 2dr Hatch 140-horsepower 1.8L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
First major unscheduled repair was at 148000 miles. full 2002 Toyota Celica review |
| 2001 | 2dr Hatch 180-horsepower 1.8L I4 6-speed manual FWD |
Typical Toyota reliability - excellent full 2001 Toyota Celica review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Reliability And Durability of the Toyota Celica
| Toyota Celica Reliability And Durability: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2002 | 2dr Hatch 140-horsepower 1.8L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
First major unscheduled repair was at 148000 miles. full 2002 Toyota Celica review |
| 2001 | 2dr Hatch 180-horsepower 1.8L I4 6-speed manual FWD |
Typical Toyota reliability - excellent full 2001 Toyota Celica review |
