| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
Toyota Celica vs. Volvo XC70 Reliability by Model Generation
Results are for year ending June 30, 2018. Only successfully completed repairs are currently included in the analysis. Routine maintenance, most wear items, recalls, and problems fixed with just a reflash or warning light reset are not included.
| Year and Model | % of Average Repair Frequency | |
 2008 - 2016 Volvo XC70 |
Best
148%
Worst
|
See problems for this generation Share on Facebook |
 2003 - 2007 Volvo XC70 |
Best
126%
Worst
|
See problems for this generation Share on Facebook |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Reliability And Durability of the Toyota Celica
| Toyota Celica Reliability And Durability: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2002 | 2dr Hatch 140-horsepower 1.8L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
First major unscheduled repair was at 148000 miles. full 2002 Toyota Celica review |
| 2001 | 2dr Hatch 180-horsepower 1.8L I4 6-speed manual FWD |
Typical Toyota reliability - excellent full 2001 Toyota Celica review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Reliability And Durability of the Toyota Celica
| Toyota Celica Reliability And Durability: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2002 | 2dr Hatch 140-horsepower 1.8L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
First major unscheduled repair was at 148000 miles. full 2002 Toyota Celica review |
| 2001 | 2dr Hatch 180-horsepower 1.8L I4 6-speed manual FWD |
Typical Toyota reliability - excellent full 2001 Toyota Celica review |
