| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
Toyota Celica vs. Volvo XC90 Powertrain and Chassis Reliability by Model Generation
Results are for year ending June 30, 2018. Only successfully completed repairs are currently included in the analysis. Routine maintenance, most wear items, recalls, and problems fixed with just a reflash or warning light reset are not included.
| Year and Model | % of Average Repair Frequency | |
 2016 - 2018 Volvo XC90 |
Best
376%
Worst
|
See problems for this generation Share on Facebook |
 2003 - 2014 Volvo XC90 |
Best
152%
Worst
|
See problems for this generation Share on Facebook |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Reliability And Durability of the Toyota Celica
| Toyota Celica Reliability And Durability: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2002 | 2dr Hatch 140-horsepower 1.8L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
First major unscheduled repair was at 148000 miles. full 2002 Toyota Celica review |
| 2001 | 2dr Hatch 180-horsepower 1.8L I4 6-speed manual FWD |
Typical Toyota reliability - excellent full 2001 Toyota Celica review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Reliability And Durability of the Toyota Celica
| Toyota Celica Reliability And Durability: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2002 | 2dr Hatch 140-horsepower 1.8L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
First major unscheduled repair was at 148000 miles. full 2002 Toyota Celica review |
| 2001 | 2dr Hatch 180-horsepower 1.8L I4 6-speed manual FWD |
Typical Toyota reliability - excellent full 2001 Toyota Celica review |
