| Model Year | 2005 | 2016 | |
| Model | Toyota Highlander | Lexus RX | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | |||
| Difference | |||
| Total Legroom | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in |
| 2005 Toyota Highlander Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2006 | 4dr SUV 215-horsepower 3.3L V6 5-speed automatic AWD |
Ease of entry and exit and the spacious leg room. see full Toyota Highlander review |
| 2004 | 4dr SUV 230-horsepower 3.3L V6 5-speed automatic FWD |
There is enough legroom and the width fits us correctly and allows us to comfortably put our elbows on the armrests. Some cars are TOO wide and the armrests are too far away from your body. see full Toyota Highlander review |
| 2016 Lexus RX Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| The Lexus RX has the roomiest back seat of the three, the Lincoln MKX the tightest. Very tall people will prefer the RX's. At 5-9, I'm not tall, and found the other two back seats much more comfortable, with higher, better shaped cushions providing better thigh support and seat backs that were not overly reclined. The RX's rear seat back felt overly reclined to me even in its most upright position. Since it adjusts, why didn't Lexus engineer it to adjust over a wider range? see full Lexus RX review | ||
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Lexus RX.