| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2016 Toyota Prius and 2006 Toyota Camry Specifications
| Model Year | 2016 | 2006 | |
| Model | Toyota Prius | Toyota Camry | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr Hatch | 4dr Sedan | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,700 mm | 2,720 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,539 mm | 4,806 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,760 mm | 1,796 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,476 mm | 1,491 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,395 kg | 1,410 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 43 L | 70 L | -27 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,001 mm | 996 mm | -995 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,397 mm | 1,461 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,356 mm | 1,382 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,097 mm | 1,057 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 950 mm | 975 mm | -25 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,346 mm | 1,440 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,318 mm | 1,374 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 848 mm | 960 mm | -112 mm |
| Total Legroom | 1,946 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,017 mm (over 2 rows) | -1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 697 L | 473 L | 224 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 1,775 L | 16.7 | -15.7 L |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Toyota Prius
| 2016 Toyota Prius Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2016 | For a compact hatchback, the new Toyota Prius feels very roomy inside. It helps that the tall, sloping console of the third-generation Prius has been replaced by one with a much less intrusive (if also less sporty) design. The deep instrument panel is scooped out on top, while the windshield is large and distant. The view forward from the driver seat is very open, but anyone who isn't a goldfish will find it unusual. It's like driving a spaceship, in two senses. Or a small minivan. The Ford C-MAX has a crossover-like driving position and the most comfortable seats. The front seats in the Prius are nicely shaped, but less firm. Those in the Volt could use more contour. I found the Civic's front seats somewhat uncomfortable. The Volt feels far tighter inside. Up front the windshield seems far smaller than that in the Prius. The back seat, while its cushion is comfortably positioned, threatens to induce claustrophobia. Both the Prius and the Volt have restricted visbility to the sides and especially to the rear. The view is much better from the driver seat in the C-MAX. see full Toyota Prius review | |
| 2016 Toyota Prius Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| Rear seat passengers in the Prius have far more knee room than those in the Volt, and feel far less closed in. Despite a low-mounted seat cushion, though, headroom is limited. Rear seat passengers in the C-MAX enjoy a much more comfortably positioned seat cushion, significantly more headroom, and better outward visibility. see full Toyota Prius review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Toyota Prius
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Toyota Prius.
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2006 Toyota Camry
| 2006 Toyota Camry Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2007 | 4dr Sedan 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed automatic FWD |
I have arthritis and it is great to have a seat that i can lower and slide way back. Not just great - it was important in the purchase decision. . see full Toyota Camry review |
| 2007 | 4dr Sedan 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed automatic FWD |
Rear seat is large and lots of leg room. Nice feature is the center armrest, which many cars in this price range do not have. see full Toyota Camry review |
| 2007 | 4dr Sedan 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed automatic FWD |
Big and comfy. see full Toyota Camry review |
| 2007 | 4dr Sedan 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed automatic FWD |
Big and comfy. see full Toyota Camry review |
| 2007 | 4dr Sedan 187-horsepower 2.4L I4 Hybrid CVT FWD |
Very big seat area for a big person. Easy to get in and out of. see full Toyota Camry review |
| 2005 | 4dr Sedan 157-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed automatic FWD |
The wings are not angled up too steeply for my wide, creaky hips. I still need a two-inch foam insert to see properly and compensate for the lack of OEM padding in the seat, though. see full Toyota Camry review |
| 2006 Toyota Camry Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2007 | 4dr Sedan 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed automatic FWD |
These seats seem to have been designed for someone 250 pounds. Wide, flat, and no proper support for your back. While this has a lumbar support for the driver, the poor seat design makes this uncomfortable for long trips. see full Toyota Camry review |
| 2007 | 4dr Sedan 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed automatic FWD |
It could not seat three adults, while the Ford could easily seat three large people, and give them limo-like legroom. see full Toyota Camry review |
| 2006 | 4dr Sedan 190-horsepower 3.0L V6 5-speed automatic FWD |
ok, but not as roomy as the azera see full Toyota Camry review |
| 2006 | 4dr Sedan 190-horsepower 3.0L V6 5-speed automatic FWD |
knees touching the back of the front seat (after i adjusted the front seat to how i would sit) see full Toyota Camry review |
| 2005 | 4dr Sedan 157-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed automatic FWD |
Hand parking brake uncomfortable to right leg on long trips. see full Toyota Camry review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Hatchbacks
See TrueDelta's information for all Toyota models.
