| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2010 Toyota RAV4 and 2013 Honda Fit Specifications
| Model Year | 2010 | 2013 | |
| Model | Toyota RAV4 | Honda Fit | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Hatch | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,659 mm | 2,499 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,600 mm | 4,105 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,816 mm | 1,694 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,684 mm | 1,524 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,524 kg | 1,132 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 60 L | 40 L | 20 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,036 mm | 1,026 mm | 0 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,450 mm | 1,339 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,367 mm | 1,308 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,062 mm | 1,049 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 1,008 mm | 991 mm | -990 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,405 mm | 1,303 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,331 mm | 1,303 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 973 mm | 876 mm | 97 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 945 mm | 0 mm | 945 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,336 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,100 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 762 mm | 0 mm | 762 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,797 mm (over 3 rows) | 1,925 mm (over 2 rows) | 1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 348 L | 583 L | -235 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 1,053 L | 20.6 | -19.6 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 2,067 L | 1,623 L | 1 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 Toyota RAV4
| 2010 Toyota RAV4 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2009 | 4dr SUV 269-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed automatic AWD |
Easy access for us older folk and plenty of room once we get there. see full Toyota RAV4 review |
| 2010 Toyota RAV4 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr SUV 179-horsepower 2.5L I4 4-speed automatic AWD |
back seat is hard, not much leg room see full Toyota RAV4 review |
| 2010 | 4dr SUV 179-horsepower 2.5L I4 4-speed automatic AWD |
no lumbar support see full Toyota RAV4 review |
| 2009 | 4dr SUV 269-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed automatic FWD |
Harder seats than in the Murano, and now in a good way. The Murano has power lumbar support, letting you melt in the seat as much as you wish. Better lateral support in the Murano as well. see full Toyota RAV4 review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Honda Fit
| 2013 Honda Fit Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
The best in this category (when you take into consideration the size of the trunk). see full Honda Fit review |
| 2013 Honda Fit Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Seat bottoms are typical Japanese style short bottomed and not conducive to long duration drives. see full Honda Fit review |
| 2013 | 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
One more thing. Rear seat comfort was obviously not a big selling point, nor a necessary feature. But one piece of it was worse than it had to be: the rear seat headrests. The artful circular shape and limited adjustment made the rear seats even harder to use; the headrest would tend to jab passengers in their spine. A better solution which was more even with the seat back would really have helped here. see full Honda Fit review |
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Toyota models.
