Model Year | 2010 | 2011 | |
Model | Toyota RAV4 | Jeep Wrangler | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr SUV | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,659 mm | 2,946 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 4,600 mm | 4,684 mm | 0 mm |
Width | 1,816 mm | 1,877 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,684 mm | 1,836 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,524 kg | 1,896 kg | 0 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 60 L | 82 L | -22 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 1,036 mm | 1,049 mm | 0 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,450 mm | 1,417 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,367 mm | 1,412 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,062 mm | 1,041 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 1,008 mm | 1,024 mm | 0 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,405 mm | 1,443 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,331 mm | 1,440 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 973 mm | 945 mm | 28 mm |
Headroom, Row 3 | 945 mm | 0 mm | 945 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,336 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,100 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
Legroom, Row 3 | 762 mm | 0 mm | 762 mm |
Total Legroom | 2,797 mm (over 3 rows) | 1,986 mm (over 2 rows) | 1 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 348 L | 1,314 L | 347 L |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 1,053 L | 46.4 | -45.4 L |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 2,067 L | 2,322 L | 0 L |
2010 Toyota RAV4 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2009 | 4dr SUV 269-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed automatic AWD |
Easy access for us older folk and plenty of room once we get there. see full Toyota RAV4 review |
2010 Toyota RAV4 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2011 | 4dr SUV 179-horsepower 2.5L I4 4-speed automatic AWD |
back seat is hard, not much leg room see full Toyota RAV4 review |
2010 | 4dr SUV 179-horsepower 2.5L I4 4-speed automatic AWD |
no lumbar support see full Toyota RAV4 review |
2009 | 4dr SUV 269-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed automatic FWD |
Harder seats than in the Murano, and now in a good way. The Murano has power lumbar support, letting you melt in the seat as much as you wish. Better lateral support in the Murano as well. see full Toyota RAV4 review |
2011 Jeep Wrangler Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2012 | 2dr SUV 285-horsepower 3.6L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range |
Even tho there are rear seats, I would never ride in back, too small back there. see full Jeep Wrangler review |
2011 | 4dr SUV 202-horsepower 3.8L V6 4-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range |
It has the ability to go back and forth but not tilt the base seat. Firm but not being able to adjust the angle (like electric 10 way) makes a difference for tall and full frame people. I will be looking to adjust angle asap. see full Jeep Wrangler review |