| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2010 Toyota RAV4 and 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Specifications
| Model Year | 2010 | 2013 | |
| Model | Toyota RAV4 | Land Rover Range Rover Evoque | |
| Engine | 3.5L V6 DOHC-4v 269 hp@6200 246 lb-ft@4700 |
turbocharged 2.0L I4 DOHC-4v 240 hp@5500 251 lb-ft@1750 |
|
| Transmission | 5-speed automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic | |
| Drivetrain | AWD | AWD | |
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 104.7 in | 104.8 in | -0.1 in |
| Length | 181.1 in | 171.5 in | 9.6 in |
| Width | 71.5 in | 77.4 in | -5.9 in |
| Height | 66.3 in | 64.4 in | 1.9 in |
| Curb Weight | 3680 lb. | 3680 lb. | 0 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 15.9 gal. | 18.5 gal. | -2.6 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 40.8 in | 40.3 in | 0.5 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 57.1 in | 56.6 in | 0.5 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 53.8 in | 0.0 in | 53.8 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 41.8 in | 43.1 in | -1.3 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 39.7 in | 39.7 in | 0 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 55.3 in | 55.4 in | -0.1 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 52.4 in | 0.0 in | 52.4 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 38.3 in | 35.7 in | 2.6 in |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 37.2 in | 0.0 in | 37.2 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 52.6 in | 0.0 in | 52.6 in |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 43.3 in | 0.0 in | 43.3 in |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 30.0 in | 0.0 in | 30 in |
| Total Legroom | 110.1 in (over 3 rows) | 78.8 in (over 2 rows) | 31.3 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 12.3 ft3 | 20.3 ft3 | -8 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 37.2 ft3 | 20.3 | 16.9 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 73.0 ft3 | 51.0 ft3 | 22 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 Toyota RAV4
| 2010 Toyota RAV4 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2009 | 4dr SUV 269-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed automatic AWD |
Easy access for us older folk and plenty of room once we get there. see full Toyota RAV4 review |
| 2010 Toyota RAV4 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr SUV 179-horsepower 2.5L I4 4-speed automatic AWD |
back seat is hard, not much leg room see full Toyota RAV4 review |
| 2010 | 4dr SUV 179-horsepower 2.5L I4 4-speed automatic AWD |
no lumbar support see full Toyota RAV4 review |
| 2009 | 4dr SUV 269-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed automatic FWD |
Harder seats than in the Murano, and now in a good way. The Murano has power lumbar support, letting you melt in the seat as much as you wish. Better lateral support in the Murano as well. see full Toyota RAV4 review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
| 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| When I first drove an Evoque, I found its front seats cushier and more comfortable than those in the X1. But that was for a short test drive. With more seat time later, the seat felt overly firm beneath my bum and the left seat cushion bolster pressed uncomfortably into my thigh. We're all shaped differently, and we sit differently as well, so your impressions may vary. As with any car, try to get as much seat time as you can before buying--few things are harder than seat comfort to evaluate during a test drive. see full Land Rover Range Rover Evoque review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
| 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 4dr SUV turbocharged 240hp 2.0L I4 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Astonishingly, the rear seats in this small SUV seat two six footers (and another, smaller middle passenger) very comfortably. see full Land Rover Range Rover Evoque review |
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Toyota models.
