| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2009 Toyota RAV4 and 2015 Lincoln MKC Specifications
| Model Year | 2009 | 2015 | |
| Model | Toyota RAV4 | Lincoln MKC | |
| Engine | 3.5L V6 DOHC-4v 201 kW@6200 334 Nm@4700 |
turbocharged 2.3L I4 DOHC-4v 213 kW@5500 414 Nm@2750 |
|
| Transmission | 5-speed automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic | |
| Drivetrain | AWD | AWD | |
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,659 mm | 2,690 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,600 mm | 4,552 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,816 mm | 1,864 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,684 mm | 1,656 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,669 kg | 1,809 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 60 L | 59 L | 1 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,036 mm | 1,006 mm | 0 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,450 mm | 1,422 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,367 mm | 1,382 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,062 mm | 1,036 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 1,008 mm | 983 mm | -982 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,405 mm | 1,405 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,331 mm | 1,341 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 973 mm | 935 mm | 38 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 945 mm | 0 mm | 945 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,336 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,100 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 762 mm | 0 mm | 762 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,797 mm (over 3 rows) | 1,971 mm (over 2 rows) | 1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 348 L | 714 L | -366 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 1,053 L | 25.2 | -24.2 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 2,067 L | 1,504 L | 1 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2009 Toyota RAV4
| 2009 Toyota RAV4 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2009 | 4dr SUV 269-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed automatic AWD |
Easy access for us older folk and plenty of room once we get there. see full Toyota RAV4 review |
| 2008 | 4dr SUV 269-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed automatic AWD |
lots of leg room. very comfortable for 2 people see full Toyota RAV4 review |
| 2009 Toyota RAV4 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2010 | 4dr SUV 179-horsepower 2.5L I4 4-speed automatic AWD |
no lumbar support see full Toyota RAV4 review |
| 2009 | 4dr SUV 269-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed automatic FWD |
Harder seats than in the Murano, and now in a good way. The Murano has power lumbar support, letting you melt in the seat as much as you wish. Better lateral support in the Murano as well. see full Toyota RAV4 review |
| 2008 | 4dr SUV 269-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed automatic AWD |
Seat is power but doesnt go back far enough for me 6ft.bottom seat coushion litte short. see full Toyota RAV4 review |
| 2008 | 4dr SUV 269-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed automatic AWD |
Tight fit for tall people in front - length and width. No worse than Forester, but not any better. 2nd row is _very_ spacious, and slides forward/backward. see full Toyota RAV4 review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Lincoln MKC
| 2015 Lincoln MKC Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2015 | Seat comfort can be highly subjective, partly because human bodies come in many different shapes and sizes. This said, the MKC's driver seat fit me like a glove from the moment I first sat down. The seat bottom is cushier than most, including those in the Acura and Audi, while the seatback is very well contoured. You'll find more lateral support in the Acura, but the Lincoln's seats offer as much as owners are likely to need in a compact crossover. The view forward from this seat is better than in the Ford Escape, as the MKC's windshield doesn't seem as steeply raked and doesn't have oddly curved, fishbowl-effect lower corners. Also, the top of the Lincoln's instrument panel better disguises its considerable depth. The instrument panels in the Acura and in German competitors require no such artful disguising, as they aren't nearly as deep. To the rear, the MKC's windows are at least as small as the Escape's, and smaller than the Acura's and the Audi's. Luckily the side mirrors are large and blind spot warning is an option. see full Lincoln MKC review | |
| 2015 Lincoln MKC Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| Unfortunately, the Lincoln MKC's key weakness is at least as apparent as any of its strengths once one moves beyond the official specs--likely cheated, per Ford's recent practice--and actually sits in its rear seat. The Escape is tighter than most back there, and the MKC is tighter still. Sitting behind my 5-9 self, my knees come within a couple inches of the front seatbacks. Put a tall driver up front, and I wouldn't fit in back. Nearly all competitors have roomier rear seats. You'll find far more shoulder room and rear knee room in the RDX. Perhaps Lincoln should have stretched the MKC's wheelbase a few inches to expand the rear seat. As is, it's about four inches shorter than the RDX, Q5, and Volvo XC60. A roofline an inch lower than the Escape's might improve the exterior's proportions, but it cuts into interior space. see full Lincoln MKC review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Lincoln MKC
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Lincoln MKC.
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Toyota models.
