| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2010 Toyota RAV4 and 2018 Mazda CX-5 Specifications
| Model Year | 2010 | 2018 | |
| Model | Toyota RAV4 | Mazda CX-5 | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,659 mm | 2,697 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,600 mm | 4,549 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,816 mm | 1,842 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,684 mm | 1,659 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,524 kg | 1,616 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 60 L | 56 L | 4 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,036 mm | 1,008 mm | 0 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,450 mm | 1,450 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,367 mm | 1,402 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,062 mm | 1,041 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 1,008 mm | 991 mm | -990 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,405 mm | 1,392 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,331 mm | 1,405 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 973 mm | 1,006 mm | 972 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 945 mm | 0 mm | 945 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,336 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,100 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 762 mm | 0 mm | 762 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,797 mm (over 3 rows) | 2,047 mm (over 2 rows) | 0 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 348 L | 875 L | -527 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 1,053 L | 30.9 | -29.9 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 2,067 L | 1,688 L | 1 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 Toyota RAV4
| 2010 Toyota RAV4 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2009 | 4dr SUV 269-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed automatic AWD |
Easy access for us older folk and plenty of room once we get there. see full Toyota RAV4 review |
| 2010 Toyota RAV4 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr SUV 179-horsepower 2.5L I4 4-speed automatic AWD |
back seat is hard, not much leg room see full Toyota RAV4 review |
| 2010 | 4dr SUV 179-horsepower 2.5L I4 4-speed automatic AWD |
no lumbar support see full Toyota RAV4 review |
| 2009 | 4dr SUV 269-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed automatic FWD |
Harder seats than in the Murano, and now in a good way. The Murano has power lumbar support, letting you melt in the seat as much as you wish. Better lateral support in the Murano as well. see full Toyota RAV4 review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2018 Mazda CX-5
| 2018 Mazda CX-5 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| According to the official specs, the Mazda CX-5 offers about a half-inch more rear legroom than the RDX. In reality, though, the Acura has an extra inch or so. While neither is cramped, you'll find significantly more rear seat legroom in a Honda CR-V, Subaru Forester, or Toyota RAV4. If you'll be putting three people in back, the Acura does have the advantage of two additional inches of shoulder room. The RDX's additional width might not be good for handling agility, but it is very good for a rear center passenger. see full Mazda CX-5 review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2018 Mazda CX-5
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2018 Mazda CX-5.
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Toyota models.
