Model Year | 2011 | 2013 | |
Model | Toyota RAV4 | Mitsubishi Outlander | |
Engine | 3.5L V6 DOHC-4v 201 kW@6200 334 Nm@4700 |
3.0L V6 OHC-4v 172 kW@6250 291 Nm@3750 |
|
Transmission | 5-speed automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic | |
Drivetrain | AWD | AWD | |
Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr SUV | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,659 mm | 2,670 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 4,600 mm | 4,641 mm | 0 mm |
Width | 1,816 mm | 1,801 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,684 mm | 1,679 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,669 kg | 1,745 kg | 0 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 60 L | 63 L | -3 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 1,036 mm | 1,024 mm | 0 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,450 mm | 1,433 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,367 mm | 1,326 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,062 mm | 1,057 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 1,008 mm | 973 mm | -972 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,405 mm | 1,425 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,331 mm | 1,318 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 973 mm | 935 mm | 38 mm |
Headroom, Row 3 | 945 mm | 899 mm | 46 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,336 mm | 1,265 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,100 mm | 993 mm | -992 mm |
Legroom, Row 3 | 762 mm | 704 mm | 58 mm |
Total Legroom | 2,797 mm (over 3 rows) | 2,695 mm (over 3 rows) | 0 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 348 L | 422 L | -74 L |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 1,053 L | 1,025 L | 0 L |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 2,067 L | 2,056 L | 0 L |
2011 Toyota RAV4 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2012 | 4dr SUV 179-horsepower 2.5L I4 4-speed automatic FWD |
I'm about 6'3" and 220lbs so I get cramped on long trips. see full Toyota RAV4 review |
2012 | 4dr SUV 179-horsepower 2.5L I4 4-speed automatic FWD |
I'm about 6'3" and 220lbs so I get cramped on long trips. see full Toyota RAV4 review |
2011 | 4dr SUV 179-horsepower 2.5L I4 4-speed automatic AWD |
back seat is hard, not much leg room see full Toyota RAV4 review |
2010 | 4dr SUV 179-horsepower 2.5L I4 4-speed automatic AWD |
no lumbar support see full Toyota RAV4 review |
2013 Mitsubishi Outlander Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
There's a reason three-row crossovers tend to be much larger than this pair. The third-row seat in the Kia Sorento doesn't provide enough headroom for the average adult male. Both comfort and knee room are also in short supply. You might think that a seat couldn't get any tighter than the Sorento's third row. But, based on the official specs, the Outlander has nearly four inches less combined legroom--a huge difference. Even children won't fit in the Mitsubishi's third row unless you slide the second row forward much of the way. The 2014's third row seat is at least a conventional seat. Last year it was little more than a sling. In either vehicle the second row split bench is roomy and comfortable, with enough height off the floor to provide adults with good thigh support. But the rear passengers in the Outlander don't get air vents. Those in the Kia do. see full Mitsubishi Outlander review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander.