Model Year | 2010 | 2012 | |
Model | Toyota RAV4 | Tesla Model S | |
Engine | 3.5L V6 DOHC-4v 269 hp@6200 246 lb-ft@4700 |
Electric 362 hp 325 lb-ft |
|
Transmission | 5-speed automatic | 1-speed automatic | |
Drivetrain | FWD | RWD | |
Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Hatch | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 104.7 in | 116.5 in | -11.8 in |
Length | 181.1 in | 196.0 in | -14.9 in |
Width | 71.5 in | 77.3 in | -5.8 in |
Height | 66.3 in | 56.5 in | 9.8 in |
Curb Weight | 3560 lb. | 4647 lb. | -1087 lb. |
Fuel Capacity | 15.9 gal. | 0.0 gal. | 15.9 gal. |
Headroom, Row 1 | 40.8 in | 38.8 in | 2 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 57.1 in | 57.7 in | -0.6 in |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 53.8 in | 55.0 in | -1.2 in |
Legroom, Row 1 | 41.8 in | 42.7 in | -0.9 in |
Headroom, Row 2 | 39.7 in | 35.3 in | 4.4 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 55.3 in | 55.0 in | 0.3 in |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 52.4 in | 54.7 in | -2.3 in |
Legroom, Row 2 | 38.3 in | 35.4 in | 2.9 in |
Headroom, Row 3 | 37.2 in | 0.0 in | 37.2 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 52.6 in | 0.0 in | 52.6 in |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 43.3 in | 0.0 in | 43.3 in |
Legroom, Row 3 | 30.0 in | 0.0 in | 30 in |
Total Legroom | 110.1 in (over 3 rows) | 78.1 in (over 2 rows) | 32 in |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 12.3 ft3 | 31.6 ft3 | -19.3 ft3 |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 37.2 ft3 | 31.6 | 5.6 ft3 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 73.0 ft3 | 63.4 ft3 | 9.6 ft3 |
2010 Toyota RAV4 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2009 | 4dr SUV 269-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed automatic AWD |
Easy access for us older folk and plenty of room once we get there. see full Toyota RAV4 review |
2010 Toyota RAV4 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2011 | 4dr SUV 179-horsepower 2.5L I4 4-speed automatic AWD |
back seat is hard, not much leg room see full Toyota RAV4 review |
2010 | 4dr SUV 179-horsepower 2.5L I4 4-speed automatic AWD |
no lumbar support see full Toyota RAV4 review |
2009 | 4dr SUV 269-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed automatic FWD |
Harder seats than in the Murano, and now in a good way. The Murano has power lumbar support, letting you melt in the seat as much as you wish. Better lateral support in the Murano as well. see full Toyota RAV4 review |
2012 Tesla Model S Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
The front seats in the Tesla Model S are reasonably comfortable, but don't look or feel especially luxurious and provide little lateral support in turns. At least in the Performance model the side bolsters should be larger and/or adjustable. The seats in the A7 similarly need more aggressive bolsters. The seats in the S7 have them. see full Tesla Model S review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2012 Tesla Model S.