Model Year | 2009 | 2016 | |
Model | Toyota Sienna | Ford Mustang | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr Minivan, ext. | 2dr Coupe | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 3,030 mm | 2,720 mm | 1 mm |
Length | 5,080 mm | 4,783 mm | 1 mm |
Width | 1,966 mm | 1,915 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,750 mm | 1,382 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,895 kg | 1,599 kg | 0 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 76 L | 61 L | 15 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 1,067 mm | 955 mm | -954 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,621 mm | 1,430 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,483 mm | 1,394 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,090 mm | 1,067 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 1,021 mm | 884 mm | -883 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,648 mm | 1,326 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,715 mm | 1,204 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 1,006 mm | 777 mm | -776 mm |
Headroom, Row 3 | 968 mm | 0 mm | 968 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,552 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,316 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
Legroom, Row 3 | 1,003 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
Total Legroom | 3,099 mm (over 3 rows) | 1,844 mm (over 2 rows) | 2 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 1,235 L | 382 L | -381 L |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 2,676 L | 13.5 | -11.5 L |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 4,216 L | 13.5 | -9.5 L |
2009 Toyota Sienna Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2010 | 4dr Minivan, ext. 266-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed automatic FWD |
The Sienna LE that I have has full power driver seat which proves to bereally goodfor my back pain. see full Toyota Sienna review |
2008 | 4dr Minivan, ext. 266-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed automatic AWD |
Room for all the kids, friends, and cargo see full Toyota Sienna review |
2008 | 4dr Minivan, ext. 266-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed automatic AWD |
With three children having ample rear seat space was very important to us. With the tri zone air system makes it comfortable for them as well. see full Toyota Sienna review |
2008 | 4dr Minivan, ext. 266-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed automatic FWD |
plenty of space and comfortable seats see full Toyota Sienna review |
2009 Toyota Sienna Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2008 | 4dr Minivan, ext. 266-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed automatic FWD |
The passenger side does not have 8 way power seat controls. see full Toyota Sienna review |
2016 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
This "why not" should not come as a surprise. Neither the Mustang nor the Audi has much rear legroom. Plus in the Mustang my head was pressed against the rear window, and I'm only 5-9. The Mustang coupe's rear seat is viable only for people up to 5-6 or so in height. The Audi has a little more rear headroom. As does the Mustang convertible. If you will be putting people into the rear seat of the Mustang, you should turn off the "easy entry" feature. When it's activated, this feature automatically motors the seat backward when the engine is shut off, reducing rear legroom to near zero. I was nearly trapped when I turned the engine off while sitting in the back seat to take photos. If you want a V8-powered coupe with a roomy rear seat, get a Dodge Challenger. Both the Mustang and the RS 5 do a better job of transporting luggage than rear seat passengers. Both trunks have about as much capacity as that of the average compact sedan. see full Ford Mustang review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Ford Mustang.