| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2011 Volkswagen Jetta SportWagen and 2016 Ford Mustang Specifications
| Model Year | 2011 | 2016 | |
| Model | Volkswagen Jetta SportWagen | Ford Mustang | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr Wagon | 2dr Convertible | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 101.5 in | 107.1 in | -5.6 in |
| Length | 179.3 in | 188.3 in | -9 in |
| Width | 70.1 in | 75.4 in | -5.3 in |
| Height | 59.2 in | 54.9 in | 4.3 in |
| Curb Weight | 3228 lb. | 3644 lb. | -416 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 14.5 gal. | 16.0 gal. | -1.5 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 38.4 in | 37.6 in | 0.8 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 54.8 in | 56.3 in | -1.5 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 0.0 in | 54.9 in | -54.9 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 41.1 in | 42.0 in | -0.9 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 38.1 in | 35.7 in | 2.4 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 53.1 in | 44.7 in | 8.4 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 0.0 in | 43.7 in | -43.7 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 35.5 in | 30.8 in | 4.7 in |
| Total Legroom | 76.6 in (over 2 rows) | 72.8 in (over 2 rows) | 3.8 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 32.8 ft3 | 11.4 ft3 | 21.4 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 66.9 ft3 | 11.4 ft3 | 55.5 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2011 Volkswagen Jetta SportWagen
| 2011 Volkswagen Jetta SportWagen Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr Wagon 170-horsepower 2.5L I5 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
I am a tall guy with big feet, so my vehicle choices are greatly restricted. The Jetta Sportwagen (Golf Wagon here in Canada) is very comfortable on long drives. see full Volkswagen Jetta SportWagen review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Ford Mustang
| 2016 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| This "why not" should not come as a surprise. Neither the Mustang nor the Audi has much rear legroom. Plus in the Mustang my head was pressed against the rear window, and I'm only 5-9. The Mustang coupe's rear seat is viable only for people up to 5-6 or so in height. The Audi has a little more rear headroom. As does the Mustang convertible. If you will be putting people into the rear seat of the Mustang, you should turn off the "easy entry" feature. When it's activated, this feature automatically motors the seat backward when the engine is shut off, reducing rear legroom to near zero. I was nearly trapped when I turned the engine off while sitting in the back seat to take photos. If you want a V8-powered coupe with a roomy rear seat, get a Dodge Challenger. Both the Mustang and the RS 5 do a better job of transporting luggage than rear seat passengers. Both trunks have about as much capacity as that of the average compact sedan. see full Ford Mustang review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Ford Mustang
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Ford Mustang.
See TrueDelta's information for all Wagons
See TrueDelta's information for all Volkswagen models.
