| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2010 smart fortwo and 2006 Ford Mustang Specifications
| Model Year | 2010 | 2006 | |
| Model | smart fortwo | Ford Mustang | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 2dr Convertible | 2dr Convertible | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 73.5 in | 107.1 in | -33.6 in |
| Length | 106.1 in | 187.6 in | -81.5 in |
| Width | 61.4 in | 73.9 in | -12.5 in |
| Height | 60.7 in | 55.7 in | 5 in |
| Curb Weight | 1852 lb. | 3476 lb. | -1624 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 8.7 gal. | 16.0 gal. | -7.3 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 39.7 in | 38.8 in | 0.9 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 48.0 in | 55.4 in | -7.4 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 45.4 in | 53.6 in | -8.2 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 41.2 in | 42.7 in | -1.5 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 0.0 in | 36.3 in | -36.3 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 0.0 in | 45.0 in | -45 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 0.0 in | 45.2 in | -45.2 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 0.0 in | 30.3 in | -30.3 in |
| Total Legroom | 41.2 in (over 1 rows) | 73 in (over 2 rows) | -31.8 in |
| Cargo Volume | 7.8 ft3 | 9.7 ft3 | -1.9 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 smart fortwo
| 2010 smart fortwo Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2009 | 2dr Convertible 70-horsepower 1.0L I3 5-speed automated manual RWD |
Roomy, sits high see full smart fortwo review |
| 2009 | 2dr Hatch 70-horsepower 1.0L I3 5-speed automated manual RWD |
comfortable driving position. see full smart fortwo review |
| 2009 | 2dr Hatch 70-horsepower 1.0L I3 5-speed automated manual RWD |
firm and supportive as needed, minimal seat fatigue on long drives see full smart fortwo review |
| 2010 smart fortwo Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2009 | 2dr Convertible 70-horsepower 1.0L I3 5-speed automated manual RWD |
There is no rear seat. Fortwo mean for 2 people. No surprises. see full smart fortwo review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2006 Ford Mustang
| 2006 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2006 | 2dr Convertible 300-horsepower 4.6L V8 5-speed automatic RWD |
seat is comfortable can be adjusted to suit your choice of position all controls are within easy reach see full Ford Mustang review |
| 2005 | 2dr Convertible 210-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic RWD |
Driving position is very flexible, all the controls are within reach and easy to use. see full Ford Mustang review |
| 2005 | 2dr Coupe 210-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic RWD |
Plenty of leg room for tall people like me. see full Ford Mustang review |
| 2006 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2007 | 2dr Coupe 210-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed manual RWD |
While our present government may blow off the standards & principles of the Geneva Convention, I still find them worthy enough to abide. Mustang rear seats are in clear violation. see full Ford Mustang review |
| 2005 | 2dr Coupe 210-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed manual RWD |
The Mustang is a cool car, but nowhere near as comfortable see full Ford Mustang review |
| 2005 | 2dr Coupe 210-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed manual RWD |
Not much room in the back of a Mustang... see full Ford Mustang review |
| 2005 | 2dr Coupe 300-horsepower 4.6L V8 5-speed manual RWD |
Rear seat is small for adults. see full Ford Mustang review |
| 2005 | 2dr Convertible 300-horsepower 4.6L V8 5-speed automatic RWD |
Rear seat is for kids. see full Ford Mustang review |
| 2005 | 2dr Convertible 300-horsepower 4.6L V8 5-speed automatic RWD |
Rear seats in name only. No real passenger room see full Ford Mustang review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Hatchbacks and Convertibles.
See TrueDelta's information for all smart models.
