Model Year | 2010 | 2016 | |
Model | smart fortwo | Ford Mustang | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 2dr Convertible | 2dr Convertible | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 73.5 in | 107.1 in | -33.6 in |
Length | 106.1 in | 188.3 in | -82.2 in |
Width | 61.4 in | 75.4 in | -14 in |
Height | 60.7 in | 54.9 in | 5.8 in |
Curb Weight | 1852 lb. | 3644 lb. | -1792 lb. |
Fuel Capacity | 8.7 gal. | 16.0 gal. | -7.3 gal. |
Headroom, Row 1 | 39.7 in | 37.6 in | 2.1 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 48.0 in | 56.3 in | -8.3 in |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 45.4 in | 54.9 in | -9.5 in |
Legroom, Row 1 | 41.2 in | 42.0 in | -0.8 in |
Headroom, Row 2 | 0.0 in | 35.7 in | -35.7 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 0.0 in | 44.7 in | -44.7 in |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 0.0 in | 43.7 in | -43.7 in |
Legroom, Row 2 | 0.0 in | 30.8 in | -30.8 in |
Total Legroom | 41.2 in (over 1 rows) | 72.8 in (over 2 rows) | -31.6 in |
Cargo Volume | 7.8 ft3 | 11.4 ft3 | -3.6 ft3 |
2010 smart fortwo Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2009 | 2dr Convertible 70-horsepower 1.0L I3 5-speed automated manual RWD |
Roomy, sits high see full smart fortwo review |
2009 | 2dr Hatch 70-horsepower 1.0L I3 5-speed automated manual RWD |
comfortable driving position. see full smart fortwo review |
2009 | 2dr Hatch 70-horsepower 1.0L I3 5-speed automated manual RWD |
firm and supportive as needed, minimal seat fatigue on long drives see full smart fortwo review |
2010 smart fortwo Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2009 | 2dr Convertible 70-horsepower 1.0L I3 5-speed automated manual RWD |
There is no rear seat. Fortwo mean for 2 people. No surprises. see full smart fortwo review |
2016 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
This "why not" should not come as a surprise. Neither the Mustang nor the Audi has much rear legroom. Plus in the Mustang my head was pressed against the rear window, and I'm only 5-9. The Mustang coupe's rear seat is viable only for people up to 5-6 or so in height. The Audi has a little more rear headroom. As does the Mustang convertible. If you will be putting people into the rear seat of the Mustang, you should turn off the "easy entry" feature. When it's activated, this feature automatically motors the seat backward when the engine is shut off, reducing rear legroom to near zero. I was nearly trapped when I turned the engine off while sitting in the back seat to take photos. If you want a V8-powered coupe with a roomy rear seat, get a Dodge Challenger. Both the Mustang and the RS 5 do a better job of transporting luggage than rear seat passengers. Both trunks have about as much capacity as that of the average compact sedan. see full Ford Mustang review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Ford Mustang.