| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
Sign in or join TrueDelta to post your own "whys" and "why nots."
Chevrolet Impala Driving Position & Visibility Pros and Cons
| Page 1 of 1 | ||
| Page 1 of 1 | ||
|
2014 Kia Cadenza Review Official TrueDelta review by Michael Karesh The Cadenza and Azera might be related, but you'd never guess this from sitting inside them. The Hyundai's windshield is much more steeply raked. Its instrument panel is deeper and seems much taller. Compared to those in any of the other cars, but especially compared to the Azera's, the Cadenza's... Comparison vehicle: 2014 Chevrolet Impala |
|
2005 Chevrolet Impala / Monte Carlo Pros and Cons Member5292 The driving position was OK, but the visibility was poor. The roof was so low and the trunk lid so high it was hard to see backing. The low roof required small side windows that cut visibility. The car had some large blind spots. |
1 comment
|
2004 Chevrolet Impala / Monte Carlo Pros and Cons A member in Pennsylvania, United States |
|
2007 Chevrolet Impala / Monte Carlo Pros and Cons Member3851 A-pillars are way too thick. Constantly missing cars in them. |
|
2002 Chevrolet Impala / Monte Carlo Pros and Cons A member in Maryland, United States |
|
Looking to trade in your vehicle? Get an estimate of how much it's worth.
| |
|
2008 Chevrolet Impala Pros and Cons Member2185 Easy to get in and out, good lumbar support, easy to see out of car. |
See TrueDelta's information for all Sedans
See TrueDelta's information for all Chevrolet models.
