Page 1 of 1 | ||
Page 1 of 1 |
1 comment |
2016 Chevrolet Camaro SS Review Official TrueDelta review by Michael Karesh Another fairly obvious "why not to buy," for either car: fuel economy. The tested Camaro scored 16 mpg city and 25 mpg highway in the EPA's tests, slightly better than the Mustang's 15/25. The automatic has an even taller top gear and when paired with it the V8... Comparison vehicle: 2015 Ford Mustang |
4 comments |
2015 Ford Mustang GT vs. 2015 Audi RS 5 Official TrueDelta review by Michael Karesh The performance of these cars is not without an obvious tradeoff. In EPA tests, the Mustang GT manages only 15 mpg city, but 25 mpg highway, with the manual transmission. With the optional six-speed automatic, the car can go a mile farther per gallon in the city. The Audi rates... Comparison vehicle: 2015 Audi A5 / S5 / RS5 |
1 comment |
A Flawed Love 2013 Ford Mustang Pros and Cons Member5493 19.6 MPG under tame driving (read: shifting at 2200rpms), 10.2 under agressive driving. |
2005 Ford Mustang Pros and Cons Member5423 Mustang is smaller but much thirstier... |
|
4 comments |
2012 Ford Mustang Pros and Cons st1100boy I was hoping for a bit better than the 24 I'm getting in commuting duty. Car still has less than 2000 miles, so it may improve w/ summer blend gas and a more broken in engine. If I could get 26 I'd be much happier, but I'm not... |
Looking to trade in your vehicle? Get an estimate of how much it's worth.
| |
2010 Ford Mustang Pros and Cons borowicz The 698 was a HP390, and got abou 9mph. I oped for the 6 because it has all the power I need and gets real world fuel economy equal to my Escapes. I consistantly get 23 plus in mixed driving |
|
2011 Ford Mustang Pros and Cons Member4718 V8, 412hp, 26mpg. Who thought those three things would ever go together. |
|
2011 Ford Mustang Pros and Cons Member4671 |
|
2006 Ford Mustang Pros and Cons Member3432 16 MPG on average |
|
2004 Ford Mustang Pros and Cons Member4314 |
|
2008 Ford Mustang Pros and Cons Member4082 For a V8, I still get great fuel economy. I average 21mpg with combined city & highway, about 75% city. Only long highway trips, I average 27mpg at 70mph. |
|
| |
2005 Ford Mustang Pros and Cons Member426 V8 while not terrible, it does use more fuel than similar sized vehicles with smaller engines. |
|
2010 Ford Mustang Pros and Cons Member3616 It flat out sucks. |
|
2009 Ford Mustang Pros and Cons Member3437 The GT/CS is surprisingly economical; GT500 is a profligate gas gobbler - but who really cares? |
|
2009 Ford Mustang Pros and Cons A member in Virginia, United States For a 4.6L V8 using 87 octane, 20 city and 28 hwy is not bad. |
|
2006 Ford Mustang Pros and Cons Member2641 |
|
2007 Ford Mustang Pros and Cons Member2905 Surprisingly, the V8 gets about 23-25 MPG highway driving IF you behave; better than my SUV. The Stang is my choice for my frequent 800+ miles trips once or twice per month. |
|
2005 Ford Mustang Pros and Cons A member in Ontario, Canada Not bad at all for a sports car with a big six cyl. |
|
2005 Ford Mustang Pros and Cons Member1072 If you drive it responsably, I easily get 22 mpg around town. At 65 mph I get 28 on the highway. |
|
2008 Ford Mustang Pros and Cons A member in California, United States 12 mpg city is poor, hi way mpg of 22 is not too bad |
|
2007 Ford Mustang Pros and Cons Member1175 I checked mileage carefully, hoping it was possible to get better than 18-20 m.p.g.- not likey in everyday driving. |
|
2002 Ford Mustang Pros and Cons Member2057 |
|
2008 Ford Mustang Pros and Cons Member1631 Premium fuel is expensive and mileage with a blown 5.4 is not stellar. I would not recommend this as a daily driver but it makes a hell of weekend and evening toy. |