Page 1 of 1 | ||
Page 1 of 1 |
2013 Volvo S60 T6 AWD - Excellent car, tremendous value. Very happy. 2013 Volvo S60 Pros and Cons mamyers I compared the 2013 Volvo S60 T6 AWD with BMW 3 series and Infiniti G-35 cars. The performance on the Volvo exceeded both handily. The pickup on this version of the S60 (not the R series) is spectacular - very good performance with high torque. |
|
My first and last volvo 2004 Volvo S60 Pros and Cons A member in Colorado, United States 300 horsepower, it is fun to dominate "race" car Hondas in a Volvo. it also get decent fuel economy about 24 |
|
Good looking car, but lower price betrays flaws 2012 Volvo S60 Pros and Cons Member5780 No complaints here. The car has an immense amount of torque, which makes it accelerate very well. Curiously, it is difficult not to accelerate quickly. Power is more than sufficient. The car has very good acceleration 0-60, 40-60, and 60-90. I've never felt a lack of power and... |
|
A Safe, Fun to Drive Car 2013 Volvo S60 Pros and Cons Member4020 I have a 250 HP turbo 5 cylinder 6 speed which performs flawlessly. There is slight turbolag from a dead stop. Acceleration from 35 up to 80 is fast and effortless. Driving bending roads is fun! |
|
2006 Volvo S60 Pros and Cons A member in Montana, United States This car has 300 hp and 295 ft lbs of torque. Bottom-end performance is strong and shifts are positive. The power inspires confidence in the driver. Fear to pass becomes a passing fear with this car. |
|
Looking to trade in your vehicle? Get an estimate of how much it's worth.
| |
2002 Volvo S60 Pros and Cons Member4648 Its smooth power delivery, with an adequate amount of torque. Engine is coupled to a responsive 5-speed automatic, which shifts seamlessly. |
|
2006 Volvo S60 Pros and Cons Member3582 lots of power on tap |
|
2005 Volvo S60 Pros and Cons A member in Alberta, Canada |
|
2004 Volvo S60 Pros and Cons A member in Virginia, United States fantastic performance, balance, acceleration, handling, except in snow |
|
2004 Volvo S60 Pros and Cons A member in Pennsylvania, United States S60R has a 5 cyl turbo charged engine producing 300 hp and 295 torque. Great performance for this size car, and in a very unassuming form - Volvo. AWD is fantastic after it breaks and is fixed, and the handling/suspension is adjustable and fun. |
|
2006 Volvo S60 Pros and Cons Member3384 for the 2.0T 180hp (rare in us) its a potent engine. with the auto-trany you get along just fine. with a chipmod 232hp is asome with this car, but with 1.40 euro the liter. stock will do here in europe. |
|
| |
2008 Volvo S60 Pros and Cons Member2712 |
|
2004 Volvo S60 Pros and Cons Member659 Responsive power with good gas mileage. |
|
2005 Volvo S60 Pros and Cons Member2430 |
|
2007 Volvo S60 Pros and Cons A member in Idaho, United States hot and rarely seen |
|
2003 Volvo S60 Pros and Cons Member1311 The turbo took quite a while to engage and for the power, I feel that a 4-cyl could have been used, which would have provided better fuel economy in the process. Also, I feel this car is hurt by the FWD platform. |
|
2004 Volvo S60 Pros and Cons A member in Texas, United States |
|
2004 Volvo S60 Pros and Cons A member in Virginia, United States 300 HP. Fast. Great handling and grip. High quality feel |
|
2004 Volvo S60 Pros and Cons A member in Wyoming, United States S60R was very good for 2004 MY luxury sedan. |
|
2006 Volvo S60 Pros and Cons Twowheelin Smooth power delivery with decent torque. |
|
2002 Volvo S60 Pros and Cons Member315 The T5 model has power to spare that is easily available with the manual transmission. More powerful than most cars of the same model year. Efficeny is more than adequate as well with the power on hand. Manual transmission is perfect. |