Mazda CX-5 vs. Jeep Patriot MPG

Chart is based on 156 fuel economy reports for the Mazda CX-5 and 275 fuel economy reports for the Jeep Patriot.

Mazda CX-5 MPG

Year	Body/Powertrain	flat, hilly, or mountainousLand	driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot	A/C use: none to heavyA/C	constant stop and goTraf %	many stops per mileCity %	stop every mile or twoSub %	fairly steady speedHwy %	Hwy Spd	MPG
2021	4dr SUV 162-horsepower 2.0L I4 6-speed manual FWD	hills	light	light	0	10	20	70	110	32.7
2019	4dr SUV 192-horsepower 2.5L I4 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD	flat	light	none	5	5	25	65	80	27.7
2016	4dr SUV 184-horsepower 2.5L I4 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD	flat	med	hvy	3	2	19	76	67	29.7
2016	4dr SUV 184-horsepower 2.5L I4 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD	flat	med	none	1	3	37	60	62	29.3
2016	4dr SUV 155-horsepower 2.0L I4 6-speed manual FWD	flat	light	none	1	10	33	56	79	35.7
2015	4dr SUV 184-horsepower 2.5L I4 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD	flat	light	light	2	15	17	65	70	25.7
2015	4dr SUV 184-horsepower 2.5L I4 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD	flat	med	light	6	6	55	33	66	25.9
Looking for a warranty? Get a quote.
2014.5	4dr SUV 184-horsepower 2.5L I4 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD	flat	light	none	0	50	0	50	110	31.5
2014	4dr SUV turbocharged 173hp 2.2L I4 Diesel 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD	hills	med	light	0	10	60	30	110	31.7
2014	4dr SUV 184-horsepower 2.5L I4 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD	flat	light	light	3	23	22	53	64	30.2
2014	4dr SUV 184-horsepower 2.5L I4 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD	hills	light	light	0	14	67	19	71	25.1
2014	4dr SUV 155-horsepower 2.0L I4 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD	hills	med	hvy	20	0	50	30	65	26.9
2013	4dr SUV 155-horsepower 2.0L I4 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD	flat	light	light	12	34	27	27	71	28.3
2013	4dr SUV 155-horsepower 2.0L I4 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD	flat	med	hvy	8	5	48	40	65	28.5
2013	4dr SUV 155-horsepower 2.0L I4 6-speed manual FWD	hills	med	none	2	5	5	88	60	35.3

Return to top

This page shows only averages. See all the Mazda CX-5 fuel economy data.

Jeep Patriot MPG

Year	Body/Powertrain	flat, hilly, or mountainousLand	driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot	A/C use: none to heavyA/C	constant stop and goTraf %	many stops per mileCity %	stop every mile or twoSub %	fairly steady speedHwy %	Hwy Spd	MPG
2014	4dr SUV 172-horsepower 2.4L I4 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD	flat	med	hvy	0	45	23	32	75	24.5
2013	4dr SUV 172-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed manual FWD	hills	med	light	12	20	10	58	72	29.5
2012	4dr SUV 172-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed manual AWD	hills	light	light	0	0	10	90	55	31.0
2011	4dr SUV 172-horsepower 2.4L I4 CVT AWD w/low range	flat	light	light	0	0	20	80	65	22.6
2011	4dr SUV 172-horsepower 2.4L I4 6-speed shiftable CVT FWD	flat	light	light	20	5	10	66	85	26.0
2011	4dr SUV 172-horsepower 2.4L I4 6-speed shiftable CVT AWD	flat	light	hvy	0	20	10	70	70	27.8
2011	4dr SUV 172-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed manual AWD	flat	light	light	0	50	10	40	65	24.0
Looking for a warranty? Get a quote.
2011	4dr SUV 158-horsepower 2.0L I4 6-speed shiftable CVT FWD	flat	med	light	0	40	0	60	70	24.2
2010	4dr SUV 172-horsepower 2.4L I4 6-speed shiftable CVT FWD	hills	light	none	17	19	10	54	120	23.8
2010	4dr SUV 172-horsepower 2.4L I4 6-speed shiftable CVT AWD	flat	light	none	10	40	0	50	100	24.8
2010	4dr SUV 172-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed manual FWD	flat	med	light	8	43	28	23	55	30.9
2009	4dr SUV 172-horsepower 2.4L I4 6-speed shiftable CVT FWD	flat	med	light	17	39	18	26	82	22.8
2009	4dr SUV 172-horsepower 2.4L I4 6-speed shiftable CVT AWD	hills	light	none	1	29	23	48	93	26.3
2009	4dr SUV 172-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed manual FWD	flat	light	none	1	20	43	36	78	29.4
2009	4dr SUV 172-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed manual AWD	hills	med	none	0	5	15	80	67	27.5
2009	4dr SUV 158-horsepower 2.0L I4 6-speed shiftable CVT FWD	flat	med	hvy	5	40	5	50	70	24.3
2008	4dr SUV 172-horsepower 2.4L I4 CVT AWD w/low range	flat	med	light	10	26	36	29	71	19.9
2008	4dr SUV 172-horsepower 2.4L I4 6-speed shiftable CVT FWD	flat	light	light	4	20	24	53	62	24.3
2008	4dr SUV 172-horsepower 2.4L I4 6-speed shiftable CVT AWD	hills	med	light	15	10	40	35	65	23.6
2008	4dr SUV 172-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed manual FWD	flat	light	light	3	30	18	48	64	28.2
2008	4dr SUV 172-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed manual AWD	flat	light	none	7	42	17	34	85	24.3
2008	4dr SUV 158-horsepower 2.0L I4 6-speed shiftable CVT FWD	flat	med	light	12	12	13	65	85	22.4
2007	4dr SUV 172-horsepower 2.4L I4 CVT FWD	flat	med	hvy	2	49	0	49	70	25.2
2007	4dr SUV 172-horsepower 2.4L I4 CVT AWD w/low range	flat	light	light	15	16	32	37	64	23.5
2007	4dr SUV 172-horsepower 2.4L I4 CVT AWD	flat	light	light	2	18	8	71	64	23.9
2007	4dr SUV 172-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed manual FWD	flat	med	light	5	15	10	70	70	27.2
2007	4dr SUV 172-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed manual AWD	hills	med	light	5	15	55	25	60	25.9

Return to top

This page shows only averages. See all the Jeep Patriot fuel economy data.

See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs

See TrueDelta's information for all Mazda models and Jeep models.

TrueDelta Reviews the Real Gas Mileage of the Mazda CX-5

Mazda CX-5 Real Gas Mileage: Pros
Year	Comment
2014	In a bid to broaden the appeal of its cars, Mazda added a focus on fuel economy to its traditional emphasis on handling. The 2013 CX-5 earned surprising EPA fuel economy ratings of 26 mpg city, 35 highway--but with a manual transmission and front-wheel-drive. Add AWD and a six-speed automatic transmission, and the ratings fell to a less lofty but still competitive 25/31. This, though, was with the wheezy 155-horsepower 2.0-liter engine. Certainly adding a half-liter of displacement (and 29 horsepower) must impact mpg. It does, but not much: fuel economy drops by a single mile per gallon, yielding 24/30. For those who'd like to trade the extra power for one mpg, the 2.0 continues to power the base "Sport" trim. I don't foresee many takers. The larger engine feels much stronger. At least as important, it doesn't sound nearly as weak and buzzy. But you won't find powertrain performance among the reasons to buy a CX-5 because the improvement merely makes the CX-5 competitive in this area. The CR-V and RAV4, among others, are about equally quick. Even with slightly lower EPA ratings the CX-5 still bests the 22/29 RAV4, especially in city/suburban driving. But there's a new segment champ. The 2014 Subaru Forester manages 24/32. see full Mazda CX-5 review

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Mazda CX-5

Mazda CX-5 Real Gas Mileage: Pros
Year	Body/Powertrain	Comment
2015	4dr SUV 184-horsepower 2.5L I4 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD	My Mazda is the AWD model, and, I'm pleasantly surprised that it's bascially hitting its EPA numbesr so far. I've done 3 long trips, mostly interstate, running 70 - 75 Mph, and, average mileage is running 27.5 - 30 Mpg. see full Mazda CX-5 review
2014	4dr SUV 184-horsepower 2.5L I4 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD	Hard to complain about averaging 27 mpg in an all wheel drive vehicle that is mostly surburban driven. see full Mazda CX-5 review
2014	4dr SUV 184-horsepower 2.5L I4 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD	This SUV gets as good mileage as my father's Ford Escape Hybrid! Overall, I love that I am actually getting better MPG than my previous car, which was a 2009 Mazda 6. see full Mazda CX-5 review
2014	4dr SUV 184-horsepower 2.5L I4 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD	The number two reason I chose this vehicle was for the gas mileage, which has so far exceeded my expectations. According to the information screen, I've been averaging between 29 and 30 mpg. see full Mazda CX-5 review
2014	4dr SUV 184-horsepower 2.5L I4 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD	Fuel economy was the best in its class. see full Mazda CX-5 review
2013	4dr SUV 155-horsepower 2.0L I4 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD	True to EPA estimates, 25 city/31 highway for the AWD AT. I've tracked about half of the miles I have driven on fuelly and get ~28mpg (mostly using the car to commute to work on state routes w/ 55 mph speed limits). see full Mazda CX-5 review
2013	4dr SUV 155-horsepower 2.0L I4 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD	see full Mazda CX-5 review
2013	4dr SUV 155-horsepower 2.0L I4 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD	Outstanding, I am still meeting or beating the EPA standards for this vehicle with an automatic transmission. Over a 3500 mile road trip, the total (calculated) MPG was 31.3 for the entire trip, this was 2600 miles of interstate, and about 900 miles of city driving and touring. The speeds on the highway were 70-80 MPH for most of the interstate, so this seems to be above EPA speeds. Of course the mileage drops off above 70 mph, but cruising at 80 MPH in west Texas, the average (tank to tank) on the two tanks was 29.6 MPG. Most of this is because of the fact that the transmission is a help as well, the locking converter and six speeds allow for a good range of flexibility for the engine to run. see full Mazda CX-5 review
2013	4dr SUV 155-horsepower 2.0L I4 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD	Being a "green" thinking person, I liked the fact that the Mazda has the best fuel economy in it's class, by a fair margin! It does deliver on it's claim: I get 30-33 on the highway, depending on average speed, even in the up and down terrain of Seattle highways, and average 20-23 in strictly city driving. Again, we have a lot of hills in Seattle, which have a big affect on fuel economy. The modest sized engine does work and rev a bit more than some of the others I drove, but it does just fine overall. IF you want a very fast 0-60 time get a BMW or Porsche SUV, but be prepared to pay the price at the pump!! see full Mazda CX-5 review

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Jeep Patriot

Jeep Patriot Real Gas Mileage: Pros
Year	Body/Powertrain	Comment
2013	4dr SUV 172-horsepower 2.4L I4 6-speed shiftable CVT AWD	Better fuel economy than my 2009 patriot - noticeable right away. see full Jeep Patriot review
2010	4dr SUV 172-horsepower 2.4L I4 6-speed shiftable CVT AWD	The Patriot gets about the same amount of fuel economy as my older Volvo s40 did despite giving me a lot more cargo room, more front seat room and what I find to be a much better stock sound system. see full Jeep Patriot review
2010	4dr SUV 172-horsepower 2.4L I4 6-speed shiftable CVT FWD	he Pat has a really good fuel milage. 9.5L/100km see full Jeep Patriot review
2009	4dr SUV 172-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed manual FWD	Good mileage i had done severals times 7.5 l/100km. see full Jeep Patriot review
2009	4dr SUV 172-horsepower 2.4L I4 6-speed shiftable CVT AWD	The best in class: my average for summer is about 8 l/100 km, for winter about 11 l/100 km. my previous toyota matrix with smaller and weaker engine and not awd, was worse with fuel economy. see full Jeep Patriot review
2009	4dr SUV 172-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed manual FWD	It get exactly what the stickers say it will. see full Jeep Patriot review
2009	4dr SUV 172-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed manual AWD	Very nice for a 4x4 SUV. see full Jeep Patriot review
2009	4dr SUV 172-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed manual FWD	gets better mileage than my 2006 caravan and 3 mpgs less than a suv hybrid with out the outrages price tag see full Jeep Patriot review
2009	4dr SUV 172-horsepower 2.4L I4 6-speed shiftable CVT AWD	better than the 10 year old sedan traded in see full Jeep Patriot review
2009	4dr SUV 172-horsepower 2.4L I4 6-speed shiftable CVT AWD	very frugal, even when driven 4x4, even when freezing. esp. on the highway. way more fuel efficient than many 2x4 cars. way more frugal than our previous toyota matrix. see full Jeep Patriot review

Jeep Patriot Real Gas Mileage: Cons
Year	Body/Powertrain	Comment
2012	4dr SUV 172-horsepower 2.4L I4 6-speed shiftable CVT FWD	I hoped for better mpgs. It is a little bit under the EPA estimates, especially in the winter time. see full Jeep Patriot review
2009	4dr SUV 172-horsepower 2.4L I4 6-speed shiftable CVT AWD	Even with the CVT set up to maximize economy, EPA numbers are slightly lower than where I think they should be. see full Jeep Patriot review
2008	0	Good fuel economy see full Jeep Patriot review
2008	4dr SUV 172-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed manual AWD	4 cylinder and a 5 speed manual, I still get lousy mileage see full Jeep Patriot review