MENU
1 0 3 4 3 4

We are 103,000+ car owners sharing real-world car information.

Join Us

Nissan Rogue vs. Mitsubishi Lancer MPG

Chart is based on 524 fuel economy reports for the Nissan Rogue and 90 fuel economy reports for the Mitsubishi Lancer.

Nissan Rogue MPG

Nissan Rogue Nissan Rogue 2018 34.5 MPG Highway Percentage 80 percent Nissan Rogue Nissan Rogue 2017 31.9 MPG Highway Percentage 75 percent Nissan Rogue Nissan Rogue 2017 27.2 MPG Highway Percentage 90 percent Nissan Rogue Nissan Rogue 2016 26.5 MPG Highway Percentage 60 percent Nissan Rogue Nissan Rogue 2016 22.0 MPG Highway Percentage 20 percent Nissan Rogue Nissan Rogue 2015 30.1 MPG Highway Percentage 78 percent Nissan Rogue Nissan Rogue 2015 22.5 MPG Highway Percentage 35 percent Nissan Rogue Nissan Rogue 2014 24.5 MPG Highway Percentage 10 percent Nissan Rogue Nissan Rogue 2012 23.2 MPG Highway Percentage 13 percent Nissan Rogue Nissan Rogue 2012 23.5 MPG Highway Percentage 36 percent Nissan Rogue Nissan Rogue 2011 27.0 MPG Highway Percentage 33 percent Nissan Rogue Nissan Rogue 2011 24.8 MPG Highway Percentage 50 percent Nissan Rogue Nissan Rogue 2010 24.4 MPG Highway Percentage 32 percent Nissan Rogue Nissan Rogue 2010 26.1 MPG Highway Percentage 48 percent Nissan Rogue Nissan Rogue 2010 20.2 MPG Highway Percentage 20 percent Nissan Rogue Nissan Rogue 2009 27.3 MPG Highway Percentage 58 percent Nissan Rogue Nissan Rogue 2009 23.0 MPG Highway Percentage 44 percent Nissan Rogue Nissan Rogue 2009 22.6 MPG Highway Percentage 48 percent Nissan Rogue Nissan Rogue 2008 26.4 MPG Highway Percentage 66 percent Nissan Rogue Nissan Rogue 2008 25.8 MPG Highway Percentage 57 percent Nissan Rogue Nissan Rogue 2008 25.5 MPG Highway Percentage 40 percent Nissan Rogue Nissan Rogue 2008 22.1 MPG Highway Percentage 51 percent
Year Body/Powertrain flat, hilly, or mountainousLand driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot A/C use: none to heavyA/C constant stop and goTraf % many stops per mileCity % stop every mile or twoSub % fairly steady speedHwy % Hwy Spd MPG
2018 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4
CVT AWD		 hills light hvy 0 10 10 80 65 34.5  
2017 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4
CVT FWD		 flat light none 2 20 3 75 75 31.9  
2017 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4
CVT AWD		 flat med none 0 0 10 90 110 27.2  
2016 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4
CVT FWD		 flat light hvy 5 15 20 60 60 26.5  
2016 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4
CVT AWD		 flat light hvy 10 30 40 20 60 22.0  
2015 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4
CVT FWD		 flat med none 1 7 14 78 64 30.1  
2015 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4
CVT AWD		 flat light light 5 30 30 35 63 22.5  
Looking for a warranty? Get a quote.
2014 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4
CVT AWD		 flat light none 3 0 87 10 70 24.5  
2012 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4
CVT FWD		 hills light light 0 28 60 13 110 23.2  
2012 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4
CVT AWD		 flat light none 2 3 59 36 69 23.5  
2011 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4
CVT FWD		 hills med light 18 44 6 33 64 27.0  
2011 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4
CVT AWD		 flat light light 14 17 19 50 75 24.8  
2010 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4
CVT FWD		 flat light light 12 12 44 32 90 24.4  
2010 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4
CVT AWD		 flat light light 2 7 44 48 67 26.1  
2010 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT AWD		 flat med hvy 0 35 45 20 100 20.2  
2009 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4
CVT FWD		 hills med light 9 29 5 58 73 27.3  
2009 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4
CVT AWD		 flat light none 3 36 17 44 89 23.0  
2009 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT AWD		 flat med light 4 25 23 48 67 22.6  
2008 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4
CVT FWD		 hills light light 11 13 10 66 89 26.4  
2008 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4
CVT AWD		 flat light none 5 9 29 57 66 25.8  
2008 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD		 flat light light 18 25 18 40 71 25.5  
2008 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT AWD		 flat med none 5 28 15 51 71 22.1  

Return to top

This page shows only averages. See all the Nissan Rogue fuel economy data.

Mitsubishi Lancer MPG

Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2014 21.2 MPG Highway Percentage 40 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2011 19.0 MPG Highway Percentage 75 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2011 20.6 MPG Highway Percentage 60 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2011 29.2 MPG Highway Percentage 65 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2011 26.4 MPG Highway Percentage 30 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2010 20.0 MPG Highway Percentage 40 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2010 21.3 MPG Highway Percentage 16 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2010 25.7 MPG Highway Percentage 33 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2010 31.4 MPG Highway Percentage 80 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2010 25.3 MPG Highway Percentage 59 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2010 27.7 MPG Highway Percentage 41 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2009 23.6 MPG Highway Percentage 55 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2009 25.8 MPG Highway Percentage 43 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2009 29.5 MPG Highway Percentage 45 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2009 27.8 MPG Highway Percentage 0 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2009 30.5 MPG Highway Percentage 75 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2008 21.0 MPG Highway Percentage 40 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2008 29.1 MPG Highway Percentage 56 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2008 25.4 MPG Highway Percentage 59 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2008 32.4 MPG Highway Percentage 80 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2006 21.7 MPG Highway Percentage 50 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2006 23.5 MPG Highway Percentage 63 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2006 25.5 MPG Highway Percentage 57 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2006 33.4 MPG Highway Percentage 80 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2005 21.0 MPG Highway Percentage 40 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2005 22.0 MPG Highway Percentage 95 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2005 22.1 MPG Highway Percentage 75 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2003 23.7 MPG Highway Percentage 88 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2003 27.0 MPG Highway Percentage 75 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2002 26.2 MPG Highway Percentage 37 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2002 28.4 MPG Highway Percentage 45 percent
Year Body/Powertrain flat, hilly, or mountainousLand driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot A/C use: none to heavyA/C constant stop and goTraf % many stops per mileCity % stop every mile or twoSub % fairly steady speedHwy % Hwy Spd MPG
2014 4dr Sedan turbocharged 291hp 2.0L I4
5-speed manual AWD		 flat med none 0 0 60 40 65 21.2  
2011 4dr Sedan turbocharged 291hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual AWD		 flat med hvy 15 0 10 75 70 19.0  
2011 4dr Sedan turbocharged 237hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual AWD		 flat med none 30 5 5 60 75 20.6  
2011 4dr Sedan 148-horsepower 2.0L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD		 flat med light 5 20 10 65 63 29.2  
2011 4dr Hatch 148-horsepower 2.0L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD		 flat med light 25 20 25 30 75 26.4  
2010 4dr Sedan turbocharged 291hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual AWD		 flat med none 5 15 40 40 75 20.0  
2010 4dr Sedan turbocharged 237hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual AWD		 flat med light 19 16 49 16 110 21.3  
Looking for a warranty? Get a quote.
2010 4dr Sedan 168-horsepower 2.4L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD		 flat med none 10 21 36 33 67 25.7  
2010 4dr Sedan 168-horsepower 2.4L I4
5-speed manual FWD		 flat light none 10 10 0 80 100 31.4  
2010 4dr Hatch 168-horsepower 2.4L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD		 flat med light 0 3 38 59 70 25.3  
2010 4dr Hatch 168-horsepower 2.4L I4
5-speed manual FWD		 hills med none 6 12 41 41 120 27.7  
2009 4dr Sedan turbocharged 237hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual AWD		 flat med light 6 6 34 55 70 23.6  
2009 4dr Sedan 168-horsepower 2.4L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD		 flat lead none 14 21 22 43 76 25.8  
2009 4dr Sedan 168-horsepower 2.4L I4
5-speed manual FWD		 flat med light 10 21 23 45 88 29.5  
2009 4dr Sedan 152-horsepower 2.0L I4
CVT FWD		 flat light hvy 20 50 30 0 0 27.8  
2009 4dr Sedan 152-horsepower 2.0L I4
5-speed manual FWD		 flat med light 7 17 1 75 103 30.5  
2008 4dr Sedan turbocharged 291hp 2.0L I4
5-speed manual AWD		 flat med light 7 20 33 40 83 21.0  
2008 4dr Sedan 152-horsepower 2.0L I4
CVT FWD		 hills med none 10 21 14 56 80 29.1  
2008 4dr Sedan 152-horsepower 2.0L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD		 flat light none 7 24 10 59 86 25.4  
2008 4dr Sedan 152-horsepower 2.0L I4
5-speed manual FWD		 flat light none 0 0 20 80 70 32.4  
2006 4dr Sedan turbocharged 286hp 2.0L I4
6-speed manual AWD		 flat med none 19 8 23 50 74 21.7  
2006 4dr Sedan turbocharged 286hp 2.0L I4
5-speed manual AWD		 flat light none 5 28 5 63 60 23.5  
2006 4dr Sedan 162-horsepower 2.4L I4
4-speed automatic FWD		 flat med none 16 16 12 57 79 25.5  
2006 4dr Sedan 120-horsepower 2.0L I4
5-speed manual FWD		 flat light hvy 0 20 0 80 70 33.4  
2005 4dr Sedan turbocharged 276hp 2.0L I4
6-speed manual AWD		 flat light none 15 5 40 40 60 21.0  
2005 4dr Sedan turbocharged 276hp 2.0L I4
5-speed manual AWD		 flat lead none 5 0 0 95 60 22.0  
2005 4dr Sedan 162-horsepower 2.4L I4
5-speed manual FWD		 flat med light 5 10 10 75 100 22.1  
2003 4dr Sedan turbocharged 271hp 2.0L I4
5-speed manual AWD		 flat med light 1 4 8 88 70 23.7  
2003 4dr Sedan 120-horsepower 2.0L I4
5-speed manual FWD		 flat med light 0 25 0 75 65 27.0  
2002 4dr Sedan 120-horsepower 2.0L I4
5-speed manual FWD		 flat light none 7 19 37 37 55 26.2  
2002 4dr Sedan 120-horsepower 2.0L I4
4-speed automatic FWD		 flat light light 18 13 25 45 65 28.4  

Return to top

This page shows only averages. See all the Mitsubishi Lancer fuel economy data.

Nissan Rogue vs. Mitsubishi Lancer MPG

Unlike other fuel economy surveys, TrueDelta's Real-World Gas Mileage Survey includes questions about how and where a car was driven. So you can get an idea of the Nissan Rogue and Mitsubishi Lancer's where a car was driven. So you can get an idea of their real-world MPG based on how and where you drive a car.

See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Nissan models and Mitsubishi models.

TrueDelta Reviews the Real Gas Mileage of the Nissan Rogue

Nissan Rogue Real Gas Mileage: Pros
YearComment
2014 Though more fuel-efficient than heavier, truck-based SUVs, crossovers have remained much less fuel-efficient than lower, lighter, more aerodynamic cars. Especially if they are equipped with all-wheel-drive (AWD), which adds weight and drivetrain friction. Still, their efficiency has been improving. With EPA ratings of 25 mpg city, 32 mpg highway, the all-wheel-drive 2014 Nissan Rogue is the most fuel efficient compact crossover. (Add one mpg for the front-wheel-drive Rogue.) The new Subaru Forester comes close, with 24/32, followed by the Mazda CX-5 (24/30) and Mitsubishi Outlander (24/29). The Ford Escape (22/30), Honda CR-V (22/30) and Toyota RAV4 (22/29) lag behind the others. In the real world, the Rogue had no trouble beating the EPA estimates. In suburban driving the trip computer typically reported averages between 27 and 31. On one 65-mph highway run downtown, the trip computer reported 40.6 on the way there, then 27.9 on the return. Wind? That, and perhaps my foot wasn't as light. Though the latter figure is much less impressive, the two-way average of 34 is quite good for an all-wheel-drive crossover, especially with the outside temperature just above freezing. I tested the Subaru Forester in colder weather with a lot of snow on the roads, so unfortunately I cannot provide comparable real-world figures for it. The averages I did observe plus the EPA estimates suggest it should be not quite as efficient, but close enough that I'm calling this one a tie. Unless you don't need all-wheel-drive. Then the Rogue has an edge. Notably, both vehicles have continuously variable transmissions (CVTs). see full Nissan Rogue review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Nissan Rogue

Nissan Rogue Real Gas Mileage: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2014 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4
CVT AWD		 I drive in an area of constant small hills and was 'forced' into AWD: milage by trip computer is only 27 after 30000 miles, but this is probably pretty good for the terrain and vehicle size. see full Nissan Rogue review
2013 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4
CVT AWD		 My other vehicle is a V6. Good on gas is a plus. see full Nissan Rogue review
2012 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4
CVT AWD		 Good fuel economy, with an average of 24 mpg with mixed driving. see full Nissan Rogue review
2011 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4
CVT FWD		 Great. I average 9 litres/100km. 31.38 MPG Canadian or 26.15 MPG US see full Nissan Rogue review
2011 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4
CVT AWD		 Still waiting to see if the 22/26 mpg pan out.... see full Nissan Rogue review
2010 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4
CVT AWD		 Reasonably good in the small SUV category. see full Nissan Rogue review
2010 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4
CVT AWD		 Had the Rogue for a 6 hour test drive. Highway mileage was 8.1litres/100km on the highway at 120K and in town was 9.3. I feel this is very good for this size of a vehicle with this much room and comfort. see full Nissan Rogue review
2010 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT AWD		 CVT makes mileage consistante between city and highway see full Nissan Rogue review
2010 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4
CVT FWD		 Disappointed! I get around 22 total if I'm lucky. Even in highway driving, I never get near the EPA upper end. I do run the A/C almost all the time, since I live in South Florida, but compared to other vehicles I have, it still is pretty bad. see full Nissan Rogue review
2009 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4
CVT AWD		 Hey - an AWD SUV that gets around 24 mpg? Sweet. see full Nissan Rogue review
Nissan Rogue Real Gas Mileage: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2008 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT AWD		 Got the Rogue instead of a Murano, based on reviews and mileage...maybe something wrong but gettting terrible mileage avg just under 20 combined with lots of hwy driving..will wait till 100K probably then do a full head to toe...dealersaid they found nothing wrong-hmpf! see full Nissan Rogue review
 

TrueDelta Reviews the Real Gas Mileage of the Mitsubishi Lancer

Mitsubishi Lancer Real Gas Mileage: Cons
YearComment
Mitsubishi did improve the powertrain's EPA ratings a few years ago. But they're still only 22 mpg city, 31 highway. Even the portly Dart GT manages 23/33 with a manual transmission. Credit a sixth ratio the Lancer lacks. In my suburban driving, the trip computer regularly reported averages in the high 20s. Other compacts have done better in the same driving, but not by as wide a margin as the EPA numbers would suggest. see full Mitsubishi Lancer review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Mitsubishi Lancer

Mitsubishi Lancer Real Gas Mileage: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2011 4dr Sedan 148-horsepower 2.0L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD		 I am getting consistent 27-29 MPG on mid-west (flat) back county roads during my commute. I am getting 32 MPG on the highway. My driving style is moderately spirited. see full Mitsubishi Lancer review
2010 4dr Sedan 168-horsepower 2.4L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD		 Uses regular gas and gets about 30 mpg. My Civic SI was getting about the same but used premium. see full Mitsubishi Lancer review
2009 4dr Sedan 168-horsepower 2.4L I4
5-speed manual FWD		 Very good millage/power ratio see full Mitsubishi Lancer review
2008 4dr Sedan 152-horsepower 2.0L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD		 The car gets average fuel economy in its class, coming in at about 22 mpg city, 30 mpg highway, but it is well above most cars. see full Mitsubishi Lancer review
Mitsubishi Lancer Real Gas Mileage: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2010 4dr Sedan 168-horsepower 2.4L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD		 It's not as great as you'd expect from an econobox. If this is your biggest concern, this is not the car for you. see full Mitsubishi Lancer review
2009 4dr Sedan 168-horsepower 2.4L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD		 17 mpg in 2.4 litter my altima that is 2.5 litter i get 23 same driving conditions hmm bigger engin better gas if it always worked out this way i would buy a bmw 335 xdrive see full Mitsubishi Lancer review
2008 4dr Sedan turbocharged 291hp 2.0L I4
5-speed manual AWD		 22-24 avarage MPG see full Mitsubishi Lancer review