MENU
1 0 3 4 3 4

We are 103,000+ car owners sharing real-world car information.

Join Us

Acura CL vs. Ford Taurus X Fuel Economy (km/L)

Chart is based on 14 fuel economy reports for the Acura CL and 267 fuel economy reports for the Ford Taurus X.

Acura CL km/L

Acura CL Acura CL 2003 56.9 MPG Highway Percentage 38 percent Acura CL Acura CL 2003 52.9 MPG Highway Percentage 15 percent Acura CL Acura CL 2003 60.7 MPG Highway Percentage 57 percent Acura CL Acura CL 2002 58.6 MPG Highway Percentage 66 percent
Year Body/Powertrain flat, hilly, or mountainousLand driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot A/C use: none to heavyA/C constant stop and goTraf % many stops per mileCity % stop every mile or twoSub % fairly steady speedHwy % Hwy Spd km/L
2003 2dr Coupe 260-horsepower 3.2L V6
6-speed manual FWD		 flat lead none 0 10 53 38 70 56.9  
2003 2dr Coupe 260-horsepower 3.2L V6
5-speed shiftable automatic FWD		 flat med light 20 30 35 15 75 52.9  
2003 2dr Coupe 225-horsepower 3.2L V6
5-speed shiftable automatic FWD		 flat med hvy 7 7 29 57 72 60.7  
2002 2dr Coupe 225-horsepower 3.2L V6
5-speed shiftable automatic FWD		 flat med light 8 15 12 66 79 58.6  

Return to top

This page shows only averages. See all the Acura CL fuel economy data.

Ford Taurus X km/L

Ford Taurus X Ford Taurus X 2009 46.2 MPG Highway Percentage 62 percent Ford Taurus X Ford Taurus X 2009 40.2 MPG Highway Percentage 55 percent Ford Taurus X Ford Taurus X 2008 50.2 MPG Highway Percentage 64 percent Ford Taurus X Ford Taurus X 2008 47.1 MPG Highway Percentage 70 percent
Year Body/Powertrain flat, hilly, or mountainousLand driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot A/C use: none to heavyA/C constant stop and goTraf % many stops per mileCity % stop every mile or twoSub % fairly steady speedHwy % Hwy Spd km/L
2009 4dr Wagon 263-horsepower 3.5L V6
6-speed automatic FWD		 flat med light 0 28 10 62 70 46.2  
2009 4dr Wagon 263-horsepower 3.5L V6
6-speed automatic AWD		 flat lead none 10 25 10 55 65 40.2  
2008 4dr Wagon 263-horsepower 3.5L V6
6-speed automatic FWD		 flat lead light 0 0 36 64 80 50.2  
2008 4dr Wagon 263-horsepower 3.5L V6
6-speed automatic AWD		 flat light light 2 7 21 70 69 47.1  

Return to top

This page shows only averages. See all the Ford Taurus X fuel economy data.

Acura CL vs. Ford Taurus X Fuel Economy (km/L)

Unlike other fuel economy surveys, TrueDelta's Real-World Gas Mileage Survey includes questions about how and where a car was driven. So you can get an idea of the Acura CL and Ford Taurus X's where a car was driven. So you can get an idea of their real-world km/L based on how and where you drive a car.

See TrueDelta's information for all Acura models and Ford models.

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Acura CL

Acura CL Real Gas Mileage: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2002 2dr Coupe 225-horsepower 3.2L V6
5-speed shiftable automatic FWD		 It is nowhere as close to 4 cylinders or hybrids, but given it is a V6 with decent power it puts out very good highway mileage. I took it to Vegas and got 30.2 mpg. Average in the city range from 21 to 26, depending how much city driving you have. see full Acura CL review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Ford Taurus X

Ford Taurus X Real Gas Mileage: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2008 4dr Wagon 263-horsepower 3.5L V6
6-speed automatic AWD		 For an AWD beast, 25.6 miles per US gallon on the highway (6 hr run) into ski country, on snow tires, is pretty darned good at 70 mph. see full Ford Taurus X review
Ford Taurus X Real Gas Mileage: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2008 4dr Wagon 263-horsepower 3.5L V6
6-speed automatic AWD		 In town we regularly got 15-16 mpg, and we rarely cracked 22 mpg on the highway. This was consistent with the 15/22 EPA ratings. see full Ford Taurus X review