Model Year | 2012 | 2017 | |
Model | Acura MDX | Chevrolet Traverse | |
Engine | 3.7L V6 OHC-4v 300 hp@6300 270 lb-ft@4500 |
3.6L V6 DOHC-4v 288 hp@6300 270 lb-ft@3400 |
|
Transmission | 6-speed shiftable automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic | |
Drivetrain | AWD | AWD | |
Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr SUV | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,751 mm | 3,020 mm | -1 mm |
Length | 4,867 mm | 5,174 mm | -1 mm |
Width | 1,994 mm | 1,994 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,732 mm | 1,775 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 2,064 kg | 2,197 kg | 0 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 79 L | 83 L | -4 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 996 mm | 1,026 mm | 995 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,565 mm | 1,562 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,499 mm | 1,473 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,046 mm | 1,049 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 980 mm | 1,001 mm | 979 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,562 mm | 1,549 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,501 mm | 1,468 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 983 mm | 935 mm | 48 mm |
Headroom, Row 3 | 953 mm | 960 mm | -7 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,450 mm | 1,463 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,067 mm | 1,227 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 3 | 739 mm | 843 mm | -104 mm |
Total Legroom | 2,769 mm (over 3 rows) | 2,827 mm (over 3 rows) | 0 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 425 L | 691 L | -266 L |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 1,215 L | 1,991 L | 0 L |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 2,364 L | 3,293 L | -1 L |
2012 Acura MDX Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2012 | 4dr SUV 300-horsepower 3.7L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
The interior prioritizes appearance over actual utility; it's surprisingly cramped for such a large vehicle. For example, my Highlander is roughly the same size externally but seems downright cavernous on the inside in comparison. A rear passenger can fully stretch out in the Toyota. Not so in the Acura. see full Acura MDX review |
2017 Chevrolet Traverse Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2016 | 4dr SUV 281-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
I bought this vehicle to be able to transport my grandchildren back and forth between New Jersey and Ohio. I have the 2LT version with four captains chairs and really enjoy the convienence of not having to move a middle row seat to allow one of them to get into the "way back". Having three kids jammed together in a middle seat for an 8 hour drive is courting disaster--that's why I needed that third seat. Everyone has plenty of space. Normally I find any drive over 4 hours a bit uncomfortable but the seat and driver's position was very relaxing and comfortable. This particular vehicle has the most room for storage behind the third seat than any in its class. It is only beat by minivans and they just aren't my kind of vehicle. see full Chevrolet Traverse review |