| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2009 Acura MDX and 2016 Ford Mustang Specifications
| Model Year | 2009 | 2016 | |
| Model | Acura MDX | Ford Mustang | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 2dr Coupe | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 108.3 in | 107.1 in | 1.2 in |
| Length | 190.7 in | 188.3 in | 2.4 in |
| Width | 78.5 in | 75.4 in | 3.1 in |
| Height | 68.2 in | 54.4 in | 13.8 in |
| Curb Weight | 4535 lb. | 3526 lb. | 1009 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 21.0 gal. | 16.0 gal. | 5 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 39.2 in | 37.6 in | 1.6 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 61.6 in | 56.3 in | 5.3 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 59.0 in | 54.9 in | 4.1 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 41.2 in | 42.0 in | -0.8 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 38.6 in | 34.8 in | 3.8 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 61.5 in | 52.2 in | 9.3 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 59.1 in | 47.4 in | 11.7 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 38.7 in | 30.6 in | 8.1 in |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 35.7 in | 0.0 in | 35.7 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 57.1 in | 0.0 in | 57.1 in |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 42.0 in | 0.0 in | 42 in |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 29.1 in | 0.0 in | 29.1 in |
| Total Legroom | 109 in (over 3 rows) | 72.6 in (over 2 rows) | 36.4 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 15.0 ft3 | 13.5 ft3 | 1.5 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 42.9 ft3 | 13.5 | 29.4 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 83.5 ft3 | 13.5 ft3 | 70 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2009 Acura MDX
| 2009 Acura MDX Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2008 | 4dr SUV 300-horsepower 3.7L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Vehicle is wide, and it feels very room from boht the drivers' and passengers' sides. see full Acura MDX review |
| 2008 | 4dr SUV 300-horsepower 3.7L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
It was the most comfortable of the vehicles we tested, including the Volvo XC90, Toyota Highlander Hybrid Limited, and Mazda CX-9 Grand Touring. Soft leather, supportive seats. see full Acura MDX review |
| 2009 Acura MDX Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2008 | 4dr SUV 300-horsepower 3.7L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Claustrophic, unusable 3rd row, with immovable knee-wall see full Acura MDX review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Ford Mustang
| 2016 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| This "why not" should not come as a surprise. Neither the Mustang nor the Audi has much rear legroom. Plus in the Mustang my head was pressed against the rear window, and I'm only 5-9. The Mustang coupe's rear seat is viable only for people up to 5-6 or so in height. The Audi has a little more rear headroom. As does the Mustang convertible. If you will be putting people into the rear seat of the Mustang, you should turn off the "easy entry" feature. When it's activated, this feature automatically motors the seat backward when the engine is shut off, reducing rear legroom to near zero. I was nearly trapped when I turned the engine off while sitting in the back seat to take photos. If you want a V8-powered coupe with a roomy rear seat, get a Dodge Challenger. Both the Mustang and the RS 5 do a better job of transporting luggage than rear seat passengers. Both trunks have about as much capacity as that of the average compact sedan. see full Ford Mustang review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Ford Mustang
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Ford Mustang.
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Acura models.
