| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2012 Acura MDX and 2013 Ford Mustang Specifications
| Model Year | 2012 | 2013 | |
| Model | Acura MDX | Ford Mustang | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 2dr Coupe | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 108.3 in | 107.1 in | 1.2 in |
| Length | 191.6 in | 188.5 in | 3.1 in |
| Width | 78.5 in | 73.9 in | 4.6 in |
| Height | 68.2 in | 55.8 in | 12.4 in |
| Curb Weight | 4550 lb. | 3501 lb. | 1049 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 21.0 gal. | 16.0 gal. | 5 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 39.2 in | 38.5 in | 0.7 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 61.6 in | 55.3 in | 6.3 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 59.0 in | 53.4 in | 5.6 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 41.2 in | 42.4 in | -1.2 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 38.6 in | 34.7 in | 3.9 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 61.5 in | 47.8 in | 13.7 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 59.1 in | 46.8 in | 12.3 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 38.7 in | 29.8 in | 8.9 in |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 37.5 in | 0.0 in | 37.5 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 57.1 in | 0.0 in | 57.1 in |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 42.0 in | 0.0 in | 42 in |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 29.1 in | 0.0 in | 29.1 in |
| Total Legroom | 109 in (over 3 rows) | 72.2 in (over 2 rows) | 36.8 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 15.0 ft3 | 13.4 ft3 | 1.6 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 42.9 ft3 | 13.4 | 29.5 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 83.5 ft3 | 13.4 ft3 | 70.1 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Acura MDX
| 2012 Acura MDX Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 4dr SUV 300-horsepower 3.7L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
The interior prioritizes appearance over actual utility; it's surprisingly cramped for such a large vehicle. For example, my Highlander is roughly the same size externally but seems downright cavernous on the inside in comparison. A rear passenger can fully stretch out in the Toyota. Not so in the Acura. see full Acura MDX review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Ford Mustang
| 2013 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 2dr Coupe 420-horsepower 5.0L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
Without the sunroof, there is adequate headroom, legroom, and hiproom for taller drivers (6'6"+). The seats are supportive and comfortable for longer drives. This car makes a competent "daily driver" in fair weather. see full Ford Mustang review |
| 2013 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 2dr Coupe 305-horsepower 3.7L V6 6-speed manual RWD |
My dad's 2010 Camaro has much more legroom than my Mustang. 2 more inches would help a lot, though I have to admit even at 6-3, I'm still pretty comfy in the Mustang. The room would be nice to have on trips. see full Ford Mustang review |
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Acura models.
