Model Year | 2015 | 2020 | |
Model | Acura MDX | Toyota RAV4 | |
Engine | 3.5L V6 OHC-4v 290 hp@6200 267 lb-ft@4500 |
2.5L I4 DOHC-4v 203 hp@6600 184 lb-ft@5000 |
|
Transmission | 6-speed shiftable automatic | 8-speed shiftable automatic | |
Drivetrain | AWD | AWD | |
Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr SUV | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,819 mm | 2,690 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 4,917 mm | 4,595 mm | 0 mm |
Width | 1,961 mm | 1,854 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,694 mm | 1,702 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,930 kg | 1,583 kg | 0 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 74 L | 55 L | 19 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 968 mm | 1,003 mm | 967 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,552 mm | 1,468 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,461 mm | 1,379 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,052 mm | 1,041 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 973 mm | 1,003 mm | 972 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,501 mm | 1,433 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,468 mm | 1,212 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 930 mm | 960 mm | -30 mm |
Headroom, Row 3 | 904 mm | 0 mm | 904 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,389 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,031 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
Legroom, Row 3 | 714 mm | 0 mm | 714 mm |
Total Legroom | 2,695 mm (over 3 rows) | 2,002 mm (over 2 rows) | 0 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 419 L | 1,065 L | 418 L |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 1,087 L | 37.6 | -36.6 L |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 1,937 L | 0 L | 1 L |
2015 Acura MDX Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
That's it for the significant advantages of the new Acura MDX. Most things it does well, but not significantly better than the generally good segment averages. It's quick, but not thrillingly so. The front seats are comfortable and supportive, and cushier than those in the Infiniti, but provide less lateral support than those in the smaller Acura RDX and are no match in comfort or support for those in a BMW X5, a Lexus RX, or the big buck Mercedes reviewed a few weeks ago. Ride quality, like the seats, is good but short of luxurious. With additional sound deadening and laminated front door glass, the 2014 MDX is quieter than the 2013, but this only brings it in line with the others. By the same token, there aren't many clear reasons to reject the 2014 MDX. The most obvious follows from its relatively compact size: though (as already mentioned) cargo volume is more than competitive, there's less room in the rearmost row than in the QX60. By sliding the second row up a couple of inches (it has a half-foot of travel), adults of middling size will fit back there. But with their butt low and knees high they won't be comfortable. The QX60 offers far more combined legroom based on the spec sheets, and a couple more inches in the real world. (The Acura's specs seem to under-represent reality for passengers even as they might over-represent it for cargo.) But the Infiniti's seats are flatter and less comfortable. The new Hyundai Santa Fe offers more legroom than the Infiniti, while Ford's large crossovers could be best of all for transporting up to seven adults--if still not as good as the typical minivan. see full Acura MDX review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Acura MDX.
2020 Toyota RAV4 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
I initially noted that the well-bolstered driver seat felt "ok." But after a few hours in it my rear started to feel sore. To be fair, I haven't had enough seat time in competitors to state that they fit me better. And even if they do, this could just be me. People come in many different shapes and sizes, have different postures, and so forth. Pity seat designers! The upshot: no one else can tell you how comfortable a seat will be for you. Make the test drive as long as you can before buying. see full Toyota RAV4 review |
2020 Toyota RAV4 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2020 | 4dr SUV 176-horsepower 2.5L I4 Hybrid 6-speed shiftable CVT AWD |
Seats are comfortable but the cockpit seems designed to enfold you and while there is plenty of dose it doesn't feel roomy. The console is over large. see full Toyota RAV4 review |