| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2012 Acura MDX and 2009 Volvo C30 Specifications
| Model Year | 2012 | 2009 | |
| Model | Acura MDX | Volvo C30 | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 2dr Hatch | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,751 mm | 2,639 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,867 mm | 4,252 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,994 mm | 1,783 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,732 mm | 1,448 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 2,064 kg | 1,452 kg | 1 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 79 L | 60 L | 19 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 996 mm | 970 mm | 26 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,565 mm | 1,361 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,499 mm | 1,349 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,046 mm | 1,074 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 980 mm | 925 mm | 55 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,562 mm | 1,194 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,501 mm | 1,054 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 983 mm | 861 mm | 122 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 953 mm | 0 mm | 953 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,450 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,067 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 739 mm | 0 mm | 739 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,769 mm (over 3 rows) | 1,935 mm (over 2 rows) | 1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 425 L | 365 L | 60 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 1,215 L | 12.9 | -11.9 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 2,364 L | 572 L | -570 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Acura MDX
| 2012 Acura MDX Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 4dr SUV 300-horsepower 3.7L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
The interior prioritizes appearance over actual utility; it's surprisingly cramped for such a large vehicle. For example, my Highlander is roughly the same size externally but seems downright cavernous on the inside in comparison. A rear passenger can fully stretch out in the Toyota. Not so in the Acura. see full Acura MDX review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2009 Volvo C30
| 2009 Volvo C30 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2008 | 2dr Hatch turbocharged 227hp 2.5L I5 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
I tested both the Mini Cooper and Volvo C30. The C30, by far, is the most comfortable and easy to find a great driving position. Driving from Los Angeles to San Francisco without any back or shoulder fatigue! see full Volvo C30 review |
| 2008 | 2dr Hatch turbocharged 227hp 2.5L I5 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
I have sat in the seat for three plus hours with no discomfort. see full Volvo C30 review |
| 2009 Volvo C30 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2008 | 2dr Hatch turbocharged 227hp 2.5L I5 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
The rear seats are a bit short on leg room. see full Volvo C30 review |
| 2008 | 2dr Hatch turbocharged 227hp 2.5L I5 6-speed manual FWD |
Rear seat room is tight, this is a small hatch coupe afterall. see full Volvo C30 review |
| 2008 | 2dr Hatch turbocharged 227hp 2.5L I5 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
The rear seat is really make for children and not adults see full Volvo C30 review |
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Acura models.
