MENU
1 0 3 4 3 4

We are 103,000+ car owners sharing real-world car information.

Join Us

Acura RDX vs. Volkswagen Eos Fuel Economy (g/100m)

Chart is based on 252 fuel economy reports for the Acura RDX and 31 fuel economy reports for the Volkswagen Eos.

Acura RDX g/100m

Acura RDX Acura RDX 2014 10.9 MPG Highway Percentage 83 percent Acura RDX Acura RDX 2013 4.2 MPG Highway Percentage 66 percent Acura RDX Acura RDX 2012 5.0 MPG Highway Percentage 5 percent Acura RDX Acura RDX 2011 5.2 MPG Highway Percentage 30 percent Acura RDX Acura RDX 2010 4.5 MPG Highway Percentage 90 percent Acura RDX Acura RDX 2009 5.6 MPG Highway Percentage 40 percent Acura RDX Acura RDX 2008 6.9 MPG Highway Percentage 49 percent Acura RDX Acura RDX 2007 11.0 MPG Highway Percentage 50 percent
Year Body/Powertrain flat, hilly, or mountainousLand driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot A/C use: none to heavyA/C constant stop and goTraf % many stops per mileCity % stop every mile or twoSub % fairly steady speedHwy % Hwy Spd g/100m
2014 4dr SUV 273-horsepower 3.5L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD		 hills med none 0 6 11 83 93 10.9  
2013 4dr SUV 273-horsepower 3.5L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic FWD		 flat light hvy 0 34 0 66 70 4.2  
2012 4dr SUV turbocharged 240hp 2.3L I4
5-speed shiftable automatic FWD		 flat light hvy 10 76 10 5 45 5.0  
2011 4dr SUV turbocharged 240hp 2.3L I4
5-speed shiftable automatic AWD		 flat light light 9 28 33 30 67 5.2  
2010 4dr SUV turbocharged 240hp 2.3L I4
5-speed shiftable automatic AWD		 mtns med none 5 3 3 90 60 4.5  
2009 4dr SUV turbocharged 240hp 2.3L I4
5-speed shiftable automatic AWD		 flat med none 0 50 10 40 60 5.6  
2008 4dr SUV turbocharged 240hp 2.3L I4
5-speed shiftable automatic AWD		 flat med light 5 26 20 49 69 6.9  
Looking for a warranty? Get a quote.
2007 4dr SUV turbocharged 240hp 2.3L I4
5-speed shiftable automatic AWD		 flat light none 14 21 15 50 75 11.0  

Return to top

This page shows only averages. See all the Acura RDX fuel economy data.

Volkswagen Eos g/100m

Volkswagen Eos Volkswagen Eos 2013 4.8 MPG Highway Percentage 1 percent Volkswagen Eos Volkswagen Eos 2009 3.3 MPG Highway Percentage 50 percent Volkswagen Eos Volkswagen Eos 2009 3.2 MPG Highway Percentage 85 percent Volkswagen Eos Volkswagen Eos 2008 3.6 MPG Highway Percentage 75 percent Volkswagen Eos Volkswagen Eos 2008 3.5 MPG Highway Percentage 43 percent Volkswagen Eos Volkswagen Eos 2007 3.7 MPG Highway Percentage 35 percent Volkswagen Eos Volkswagen Eos 2007 2.0 MPG Highway Percentage 80 percent Volkswagen Eos Volkswagen Eos 2007 4.2 MPG Highway Percentage 78 percent
Year Body/Powertrain flat, hilly, or mountainousLand driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot A/C use: none to heavyA/C constant stop and goTraf % many stops per mileCity % stop every mile or twoSub % fairly steady speedHwy % Hwy Spd g/100m
2013 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual FWD		 flat med light 0 23 76 1 70 4.8  
2009 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4
6-speed manual FWD		 flat light none 0 0 50 50 65 3.3  
2009 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual FWD		 flat light light 0 15 0 85 60 3.2  
2008 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4
6-speed manual FWD		 flat med light 6 19 0 75 65 3.6  
2008 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual FWD		 flat med light 9 15 33 43 63 3.5  
2007 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual FWD		 flat med none 9 15 42 35 68 3.7  
2007 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 140hp 2.0L I4 Diesel
6-speed automated manual FWD		 flat light light 0 5 15 80 75 2.0  
Looking for a warranty? Get a quote.
2007 2dr Hardtop conv. 250-horsepower 3.2L V6
6-speed automated manual FWD		 hills lead light 3 10 10 78 78 4.2  

Return to top

This page shows only averages. See all the Volkswagen Eos fuel economy data.

Acura RDX vs. Volkswagen Eos Fuel Economy (g/100m)

Unlike other fuel economy surveys, TrueDelta's Real-World Gas Mileage Survey includes questions about how and where a car was driven. So you can get an idea of the Acura RDX and Volkswagen Eos's where a car was driven. So you can get an idea of their real-world g/100m based on how and where you drive a car.

See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Acura models and Volkswagen models.

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Acura RDX

Acura RDX Real Gas Mileage: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2009 4dr SUV turbocharged 240hp 2.3L I4
5-speed shiftable automatic AWD		 Turbo eats gas but provides for a fun ride see full Acura RDX review
2008 4dr SUV turbocharged 240hp 2.3L I4
5-speed shiftable automatic AWD		 Low for a 4-cylinder see full Acura RDX review
2007 4dr SUV turbocharged 240hp 2.3L I4
5-speed shiftable automatic AWD		 I average around 20 MPG, but it is not an economy car - well worth it for the performance see full Acura RDX review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Volkswagen Eos

Volkswagen Eos Real Gas Mileage: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2009 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4
6-speed manual FWD		 On the freeway, I get 32 MPG with the cruise set at 65. Around town, I get about 30, driving conservatively. On my commute, I find that I get 27 if I drive like everyone else, zooming and stopping. If I make an effort to minimize braking, and coast on the hills and where ever possible, I’ve gotten as high as 35 MPG on the same route. The car does need 91 octane—it will run on 89 octane, but the mileage goes down, so it is a false economy. see full Volkswagen Eos review
2008 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual FWD		 31 mpg plus on road trips see full Volkswagen Eos review
2008 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual FWD		 For my short commute I average 25 mpg. Driving longer distances with the top up I get better than 32 mpg. see full Volkswagen Eos review
Volkswagen Eos Real Gas Mileage: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2012 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual FWD		 I have averaged 27.3 MPG since new which in itself is not bad but the engine requires a minimum of 91 octane fuel. Based on availability that makes it require 93 octane fuel. If the added fuel cost is considered that effectively makes fuel cost the same as a car averaging 25 MPG using 87 octane fuel. Most of my driving is highway and I do not view this as economical for a 2 liter 4. My other car has a 35% more powerful engine and is both larger and heavier but has lower fuel cost. see full Volkswagen Eos review