We are 103,000+ car owners sharing real-world car information.

Join Us

Cadillac ATS vs. Ford Five Hundred Fuel Economy (km/L)

Chart is based on 7 fuel economy reports for the Cadillac ATS and 73 fuel economy reports for the Ford Five Hundred.

Cadillac ATS km/L

Cadillac ATS Cadillac ATS 2014 57.9 MPG Highway Percentage 49 percent Cadillac ATS Cadillac ATS 2013 66.3 MPG Highway Percentage 85 percent
Year Body/Powertrain flat, hilly, or mountainousLand driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot A/C use: none to heavyA/C constant stop and goTraf % many stops per mileCity % stop every mile or twoSub % fairly steady speedHwy % Hwy Spd km/L
2014 4dr Sedan turbocharged 272hp 2.0L I4
6-speed shiftable automatic RWD
flat med light 0 28 22 49 75 57.9  
2013 4dr Sedan 321-horsepower 3.6L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic RWD
flat med none 0 0 15 85 80 66.3  

Return to top

This page shows only averages. See all the Cadillac ATS fuel economy data.

Ford Five Hundred km/L

Ford Five Hundred Ford Five Hundred 2007 55.4 MPG Highway Percentage 75 percent Ford Five Hundred Ford Five Hundred 2007 57.8 MPG Highway Percentage 39 percent Ford Five Hundred Ford Five Hundred 2006 60.0 MPG Highway Percentage 57 percent Ford Five Hundred Ford Five Hundred 2006 49.2 MPG Highway Percentage 48 percent Ford Five Hundred Ford Five Hundred 2006 56.2 MPG Highway Percentage 28 percent Ford Five Hundred Ford Five Hundred 2005 51.8 MPG Highway Percentage 49 percent Ford Five Hundred Ford Five Hundred 2005 54.7 MPG Highway Percentage 58 percent
Year Body/Powertrain flat, hilly, or mountainousLand driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot A/C use: none to heavyA/C constant stop and goTraf % many stops per mileCity % stop every mile or twoSub % fairly steady speedHwy % Hwy Spd km/L
2007 4dr Sedan 203-horsepower 3.0L V6
CVT AWD
flat light hvy 1 15 9 75 70 55.4  
2007 4dr Sedan 203-horsepower 3.0L V6
6-speed automatic FWD
flat light light 7 19 35 39 65 57.8  
2006 4dr Sedan 203-horsepower 3.0L V6
CVT FWD
flat light light 0 0 43 57 60 60.0  
2006 4dr Sedan 203-horsepower 3.0L V6
CVT AWD
flat light none 12 32 8 48 64 49.2  
2006 4dr Sedan 203-horsepower 3.0L V6
6-speed automatic FWD
flat light light 5 22 45 28 66 56.2  
2005 4dr Sedan 203-horsepower 3.0L V6
CVT AWD
flat med light 12 17 23 49 66 51.8  
2005 4dr Sedan 203-horsepower 3.0L V6
6-speed automatic FWD
hills med light 11 9 22 58 68 54.7  

Return to top

This page shows only averages. See all the Ford Five Hundred fuel economy data.

Cadillac ATS vs. Ford Five Hundred Fuel Economy (km/L)

Unlike other fuel economy surveys, TrueDelta's Real-World Gas Mileage Survey includes questions about how and where a car was driven. So you can get an idea of the Cadillac ATS and Ford Five Hundred's where a car was driven. So you can get an idea of their real-world km/L based on how and where you drive a car.

See TrueDelta's information for all Sedans and Coupes.
See TrueDelta's information for all Cadillac models and Ford models.

TrueDelta Reviews the Real Gas Mileage of the Cadillac ATS

Cadillac ATS Real Gas Mileage: Cons
YearComment
On paper, the ATS's engines meet or exceed competitors. Even the base 2.5-liter four-cylinder engine peaks at over 200 horsepower, while the 2.0-liter turbo kicks out 272 and the 3.6-liter V6 321. I found the base engine more satisfactory than most reviewers have. But the other two don't feel as strong as their power ratings suggest they ought to, and could also sound and feel more sophisticated and thrilling. They're all fairly good engines, but none of them is a great engine. Fuel economy falls short of the BMW. The 2.0T engine is EPA-rated 19 city, 30 highway with a manual transmission, 21/31 with an automatic. Step up to the V6, and the numbers fall to 18/28. Deduct a couple of highway mpg with AWD. The BMW's ratings are much higher. The 328i's 2.0T engine is rated 22/34 with a manual transmission, 23/33 with a six-speed automatic. The 335i's six-cylinder engine when paired with an eight-speed automatic transmission somehow manages the same EPA rating as the 328i's four-cylinder. In the real world it doesn't fare as well, though. The V6 in the Infiniti in conjunction with a seven-speed automatic transmission is about even with that in the Cadillac, 19/27. Pair it with a manual transmission and the numbers fall to 18/25, worst of the bunch. see full Cadillac ATS review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Cadillac ATS

None of our members have yet commented on the real gas mileage of the Cadillac ATS.

Be the first!

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Ford Five Hundred

Ford Five Hundred Real Gas Mileage: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2007 4dr Sedan 203-horsepower 3.0L V6
6-speed automatic FWD
Fuel mpg: daily - 24-27; short trips (100-200 mi.) - 26-28; winter daily - 21-26 (lot of idling); and, long trips - 5000 mi in Mar. 08 was 27-32 depending on the leg. On the open country interstates the mpg eould start to drop if I exceeded 69 mph see full Ford Five Hundred review
2007 4dr Sedan 203-horsepower 3.0L V6
CVT AWD
Trip to Florida from WV 29.4 mpg. On the way back, 28.7mpg. I avg. about 24.5mpg back and forth to work, some in town driving (15%) mostly rural (85%). For an AWD and the size, this is fantastic. see full Ford Five Hundred review
2007 4dr Sedan 203-horsepower 3.0L V6
6-speed automatic FWD
24 MPG for a huge car! see full Ford Five Hundred review
2006 4dr Sedan 203-horsepower 3.0L V6
6-speed automatic FWD
excellent on long trips, 29 mpg see full Ford Five Hundred review
Ford Five Hundred Real Gas Mileage: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2006 4dr Sedan 203-horsepower 3.0L V6
CVT FWD
hwy driving at speed limit (70 mph) gets about 20 mpg (based on 75000 miles driving experience) -- does not match the epa recommendations see full Ford Five Hundred review