| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2010 Chevrolet Malibu and 2012 Honda Fit Specifications
| Model Year | 2010 | 2012 | |
| Model | Chevrolet Malibu | Honda Fit | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr Sedan | 4dr Hatch | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,852 mm | 2,499 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,872 mm | 4,105 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,786 mm | 1,694 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,450 mm | 1,524 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,565 kg | 1,132 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 61 L | 40 L | 21 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,001 mm | 1,026 mm | 0 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,420 mm | 1,339 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,346 mm | 1,308 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,072 mm | 1,049 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 945 mm | 991 mm | -46 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,369 mm | 1,303 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,323 mm | 1,303 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 955 mm | 876 mm | 79 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,027 mm (over 2 rows) | 1,925 mm (over 2 rows) | 1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 428 L | 583 L | -155 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 15.1 | 1,623 L | 14.1 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 Chevrolet Malibu
| 2010 Chevrolet Malibu Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr Sedan 169-horsepower 2.4L I4 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Good legroom. Hip room is alittle tight in this year's Malibu. see full Chevrolet Malibu review |
| 2010 Chevrolet Malibu Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr Sedan 169-horsepower 2.4L I4 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
drivers seat is hard on my back, no matter how much I adjust...seems to be missing some foam on left side bolster...taking into dealer for possible replacement of seat cushion soon see full Chevrolet Malibu review |
| 2009 | 4dr Sedan 169-horsepower 2.4L I4 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
After driving this car for a half hour, my back was in pain. How absolutely useless on a roadtrip. see full Chevrolet Malibu review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Honda Fit
| 2012 Honda Fit Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
The best in this category (when you take into consideration the size of the trunk). see full Honda Fit review |
| 2012 Honda Fit Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Seat bottoms are typical Japanese style short bottomed and not conducive to long duration drives. see full Honda Fit review |
| 2013 | 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
One more thing. Rear seat comfort was obviously not a big selling point, nor a necessary feature. But one piece of it was worse than it had to be: the rear seat headrests. The artful circular shape and limited adjustment made the rear seats even harder to use; the headrest would tend to jab passengers in their spine. A better solution which was more even with the seat back would really have helped here. see full Honda Fit review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Sedans
See TrueDelta's information for all Chevrolet models.
