Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban (2015) vs. Nissan Versa (2014) Specs
How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2015 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban and 2014 Nissan Versa specs.
2015 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban and 2014 Nissan Versa Specifications
| Model Year |
2015 |
2014 |
|
| Model |
Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban |
Nissan Versa |
|
| Engine |
|
|
|
| Transmission |
|
|
|
| Drivetrain |
|
|
|
| Body |
4dr SUV |
4dr Sedan |
|
| |
|
|
Difference |
| Wheelbase |
116.0 in |
102.4 in |
13.6 in |
| Length |
204.0 in |
175.4 in |
28.6 in |
| Width |
80.5 in |
66.7 in |
13.8 in |
| Height |
74.4 in |
59.6 in |
14.8 in |
| Curb Weight |
5466 lb. |
2354 lb. |
3112 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity |
26.0 gal. |
10.8 gal. |
15.2 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 |
42.8 in |
39.8 in |
3 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 |
64.8 in |
51.7 in |
13.1 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 |
60.8 in |
48.1 in |
12.7 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 |
45.3 in |
41.8 in |
3.5 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 |
38.7 in |
37.0 in |
1.7 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 |
65.1 in |
51.9 in |
13.2 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 |
60.3 in |
46.2 in |
14.1 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 |
39.0 in |
37.0 in |
2 in |
| Headroom, Row 3 |
38.1 in |
0.0 in |
38.1 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 |
62.6 in |
0.0 in |
62.6 in |
| Hip Room, Row 3 |
49.3 in |
0.0 in |
49.3 in |
| Legroom, Row 3 |
24.8 in |
0.0 in |
24.8 in |
| Total Legroom |
109.1 in (over 3 rows) |
78.8 in (over 2 rows) |
30.3 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum |
15.3 ft3 |
14.8 ft3 |
0.5 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 |
51.6 ft3 |
14.8 |
36.8 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum |
94.7 ft3 |
14.8 ft3 |
79.9 ft3 |
Return to top
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban
| 2015 |
Some (perhaps more than some) people are drawn to large SUVs because they like to feel like the king of the road when behind the wheel. Others need a lot of space while driving, or at least feel they do. Few vehicles have more front seat room than the new Tahoe. With an inch-and-a-half less shoulder room, the Ford's front-row dimensions aren't quite as generous, and its taller, shifter-festooned console is more intrusive.
The front seats are comfortable in both. The Expedition's are a little wider and softer, and they're upholstered with especially rich hides in the King Ranch and Platinum (vs. the most recently tested and photographed Limited). Whether this is preferable is a matter of taste.
see full Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban review |
| 2015 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban Seat Room and Comfort: Cons |
| Year | Comment |
|
Both the Tahoe and Expedition have roomy, comfortable second-row seats, with a slight edge to the higher cushions in the Chevrolet. Bonus points to the Tahoe for automatic rear climate controls (they're manual in the Expedition).
Move to the third-row seat, and you'll wonder why, despite redesigns for 2007 and 2015, General Motors has stubbornly refused to follow Ford's 2003 switch from a solid rear axle to an independent rear suspension. With a solid axle, the rear floor must be high to permit the rear differential to travel up and down when a wheel hits a bump. Consequently, the Tahoe's third row seat must be very thinly constructed and mounted very close to the floor. Even pre-teen children won't be comfortable in it.
In sharp contrast, the Expedition's third-row seat is higher off the floor than its second-row seat, much less the ridiculously low third row in the Tahoe, and is--surprise--considerably more comfortable as a result.
The Suburban's third-row seat is roomier than the Tahoe's but still far inferior to the Expedition's.
see full Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban.
Be the first!
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Nissan Versa
| 2014 |
0 |
I was expecting zero room in the back, but I sat in the backseat even with the drivers seat adjusted far back (I'm 5'11" but long legs and tend to adjust seats to the back end of their travel), I had reasonable legroom for a very compact car. The seat covering material was pleasant as well.
see full Nissan Versa review |
| 2013 |
4dr Sedan 109-horsepower 1.6L I4
5-speed manual FWD |
Even with the front seats slid all the way back, this car still has more room than almost any other car -- almost as much room as a BMW 780IL.
see full Nissan Versa review |
| 2014 Nissan Versa Seat Room and Comfort: Cons |
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 |
4dr Sedan 109-horsepower 1.6L I4
5-speed manual FWD |
When I bought the car, I laid the seat down all the way to make sure it would be comfortable enough to nap on. It is, but it's slightly more comfortable if the car is parked on an incline because the seat doesn't quite go down completely flat... although come to think of it I haven't tried raising the seat height with the lever then setting the seat back. Anyway, the passenger side doesn't have a seat height adjustment lever and it doesn't quite make a 180% flat angle either.
see full Nissan Versa review |
See TrueDelta's information for all
SUVsSee TrueDelta's information for all
Chevrolet models.
