| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2014 Chevrolet Traverse and 2015 Ford Mustang Specifications
| Model Year | 2014 | 2015 | |
| Model | Chevrolet Traverse | Ford Mustang | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 2dr Coupe | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 3,020 mm | 2,720 mm | 1 mm |
| Length | 5,174 mm | 4,783 mm | 1 mm |
| Width | 1,994 mm | 1,915 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,775 mm | 1,382 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 2,107 kg | 1,599 kg | 1 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 83 L | 61 L | 22 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,026 mm | 955 mm | -954 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,562 mm | 1,430 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,473 mm | 1,394 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,049 mm | 1,067 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 1,001 mm | 884 mm | -883 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,549 mm | 1,326 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,468 mm | 1,204 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 935 mm | 777 mm | 158 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 960 mm | 0 mm | 960 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,463 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,227 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 843 mm | 0 mm | 843 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,827 mm (over 3 rows) | 1,844 mm (over 2 rows) | 1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 691 L | 382 L | 309 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 1,991 L | 13.5 | -12.5 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 3,293 L | 13.5 | -10.5 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Chevrolet Traverse
| 2014 Chevrolet Traverse Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2014 | 4dr SUV 281-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
The second row captain's chairs are roomy and comfortable. The third row bench seat has a surprising amount of space, in particular with the 2nd row seats slid forward some. see full Chevrolet Traverse review |
| 2014 Chevrolet Traverse Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2014 | 4dr SUV 281-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
The seats we have on our LT are fine but the headrest on both cars I've had jut out too far and cannot be adjusted back far enough to be comfortable. This is particularly uncomfortable on longer trips. see full Chevrolet Traverse review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Ford Mustang
| 2015 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| This "why not" should not come as a surprise. Neither the Mustang nor the Audi has much rear legroom. Plus in the Mustang my head was pressed against the rear window, and I'm only 5-9. The Mustang coupe's rear seat is viable only for people up to 5-6 or so in height. The Audi has a little more rear headroom. As does the Mustang convertible. If you will be putting people into the rear seat of the Mustang, you should turn off the "easy entry" feature. When it's activated, this feature automatically motors the seat backward when the engine is shut off, reducing rear legroom to near zero. I was nearly trapped when I turned the engine off while sitting in the back seat to take photos. If you want a V8-powered coupe with a roomy rear seat, get a Dodge Challenger. Both the Mustang and the RS 5 do a better job of transporting luggage than rear seat passengers. Both trunks have about as much capacity as that of the average compact sedan. see full Ford Mustang review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Ford Mustang
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Ford Mustang.
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Chevrolet models.
